Profile of Tiger Baron

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Which infantry models would you change if you could?15 Jun 2016, 04:33 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2016, 15:04 PMKatitof I suppose you do full time charity for living? Considering I'm a modder and that I give back to the community and the game itself without getting anything out of it, technically, I am, still doesn't justify the first game being full modable without the need to fork over extra cash for a simple thing like skins. I mean, yeah, sure, if commanders weren't paid with real money like in TF2 meaning that the loot drops are solely aesthetic, sure, I totally support paid skins and stuff, like in TF2, but they're just milking this cow all the way now. In: Lobby
Thread: Which infantry models would you change if you could?14 Jun 2016, 08:12 AM I'm betting my money on Relic wanting to make money off of em. In: Lobby
Thread: Which infantry models would you change if you could?13 Jun 2016, 21:34 PM Replace Wehr Grenadiers with Weapon crew models, give weapon crew models Ostruppen's back thingy, done. Give OKW and Brits proper crew models, agreed. And yeah as mentioned, stormtroopers/jaegers turned out to be reskinned PGs. The 2nd picture you have of Band of Brothers is that of the 101st AIRBORNE Division, meaning those are AIRBORNE troops, not ordinary infantrymen, just noting. In: Lobby
Thread: Brits OP as F-?13 Jun 2016, 05:08 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2016, 02:13 AMFiresparks no body likes emplacements cancer. don't use it as excuse to nerf the british's entire army. If you nerf the Brits' mortar emplacement is you're effectively destroying their indirect fire support capabilities altho it's possible to do without the Bofors and Mortar pit, it's hard, and you're sometimes forced to either capture a decrewed mortar or go mobile assault for the land matress which is complete and utter bullshit like it was for the OKW Not to have an MG by default. And the emplacements are OP doesn't really go for the 17pounder since nobody even uses that thing, too big, too costly to make and maintain, a bofors in the right position can make a difference which would cost the British player a lot of resources and population to hold the same position. Edit: What I mean to say is, if you nerf their immobile part of the Army, you need to buff their mobile parts and add a mortar. Ideally you could also lock emplacements behind Anvil and their mobile counterparts into Hammer or Idk. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: War Spoils Rating12 Jun 2016, 00:09 AM Needs some price adjustments. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Good rejected things in CoH 211 Jun 2016, 21:40 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 18:42 PMHighfiveeeee I am pretty sure that at least all Ostheer vehicles can be hulled down. IMO Relic created the commander's abilities without even knowing which one will be in which commander in the final game so they probably just made a function that hulls down the area around the targeted object. For example Soviets had a commander with ISU + IS2 + Bombing run in the Alpha (I think it is also posted in this thread). I am actually a bit irritated why Allied vehicles can't be hulled down. I'm gonna test that one later. Agreed, I'd love to have hull down back for the Brits. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New War spoils miscalculation?11 Jun 2016, 12:24 PM So I don't get it, if you lose a game you get just 1500 points and that's fucking you up until you lose 3 more times to even it out, since those 500 points are needed for that one war spoils and it's just so frustrating, I lost a game due to a bad teammate not doing his job by securing the flank, leaves, and we get fucked over, effectively losing the game after 30 mins of time wasting. And the other thing is, the stupid prices on skins, I'm still losing those 50 points to buy stuff. What I mean to say to say is that I think the prices should be further adjusted so it's not so frustrating to lose a game or buy something, if you have 5500 points for a drop you need to play ANOTHER game for the drop, and if you have 14950 loot points you need ANOTHER duplicate made into loot points in order to get a new commander for example, the system is fine, altho I would much rather prefer we actually trade commanders through Steam, but the prices still need further adjusting in order to not be so frustrating. Also, this bullshit: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=701615604 Edit: I bought a skin and didn't really think it would be so frustrating afterwards with the loot points. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Good rejected things in CoH 211 Jun 2016, 12:11 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 10:58 AMQWERTYAndreas Well... technically you could play a multiplayergame as wehr with hulldown, capture another factions vechile and then make it hulldown? But i haven't tested it... Nah I just tested it the other day with the British by giving them the ability to hull down (both to the tanks and the infantry) and nothing, I also tried with the OKW's Jagdtiger, nothing. I'm not even sure if the Tiger can be hulled down since it's not in any doctrine that has hull down. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Do you want COH1 remake?11 Jun 2016, 08:06 AM There's already a limited mod that does this on the Workshop, a total remake would be possible with the expanding of the modding tools. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should be there a 3rd axis faction? If yes who?11 Jun 2016, 08:03 AM A German-Italian Army WOULD BE viable, an Italian only Army, not so much, it would rival and even underperform compared to the Afrika Korps. In: COH2 Gameplay