Profile of JohnSmith

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1273

General Information


Thread: Soviet HMG Bunker - why not?18 Jun 2016, 14:18 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2016, 14:10 PMMissCommissar [..] It would be fair, reasonable [..] There is nothing unfair, nor unreasonable in Relic's attempt to make Axis more enjoyable against UKF, whilst not fixing the disadvantages, that only you perceive, of your favourite Allied faction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet HMG Bunker - why not?18 Jun 2016, 14:06 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2016, 14:03 PMMissCommissar Ha-ha, so, runining "uniqness\| of OKW by givning them non-doc HMGs and howitzers in doctrine is fine, but giving some defensive positions for USSR. Again, if it is acceptable for OKW to get non-doc HMG and howitzers, why it is not accpetable for USSR to get only 1 type of defensive position. This started as an interesting thread, but you do come across as yet another typical low-ranked USSR player who is displeased that OKW is getting a few changes things in the next upcoming patch, whereas USSR hasn't had enough love to fulfill your narrow tunnel perspective of the game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Shadowwada's June 21 Patch Analysis18 Jun 2016, 13:59 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2016, 13:51 PMIA3 - HH yes okw medics and pioneers shouldn't have fuel cost Why? OKW has had enough to be the special snowflake of this game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet HMG Bunker - why not?18 Jun 2016, 13:56 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2016, 13:53 PMMissCommissar Lol, until B-4 won't be fixed, USSR won't be my favorite faction. And I didn't see any reasonable arguments or points here against "soviets getting defensive structures". It was rather clear in my post, as supported by previous posters Kamzil118 and bicho1. No need to be rude because I do not support your cause. The benefits of each faction should stay unique, and there should not be too many overlap. There is no need to incorporate elements of game-play because you keep underlining that it is unfair that Axis get things, but not your USSR, without looking at the greater picture of the gameplay mechanics (e.g. Kamzil118 underlined half trucks and merging). There is no need to argue about a means to cover a lack of your favourite USSR faction. Each faction is unique with their pro and contra. If you wish to get the benefits of Ostheer, go play Ostheer! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet HMG Bunker - why not?18 Jun 2016, 13:51 PM I heartily disagree with MissCommissar's opinion for her favourite faction to have this change. I do believe that her proposed changes are quite outrageous, misleading and would certainly not benefit to the fun of the game. I do recommend her to stop playing and supporting USSR if she wishes to obtain the benefits of Ostheer, which is, in this case, bunkers and other defensive structures. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Shadowwada's June 21 Patch Analysis18 Jun 2016, 12:07 PM I highly respect OP's opinion as he provides rather deep insights of the status of the game from a top ranked player's perspective. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Any opinions on the new USF mortar?17 Jun 2016, 18:46 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2016, 18:45 PMVuther Which is to say, use Snipers. Insert circular response here Use quick M20 then! In: Lobby
Thread: Any opinions on the new USF mortar?17 Jun 2016, 18:10 PM Mortars cost MP and make USF less mobile. I trashed players who opened with 2 mortars and 2 RMs in the preview as they couldn't hold up with the movements and quick decap through kuebelwagen. Scaremongers much? In: Lobby
Thread: Infantry/Team-Weapons Spawning from buildings17 Jun 2016, 12:49 PM I have no strong feelings one way or the other. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Predictions for win rates after JUNE BALANCE UPDATE17 Jun 2016, 12:43 PM Is this another thread about Wehrmacht being the UP faction? Certainly reads like that. In: Lobby