Profile of JohnSmith

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1273

General Information


Thread: T70 way too effective8 Jul 2016, 17:18 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 16:52 PMMissCommissar That calls "irony" and "sarcasm", dude... Don't be so sirius and go get some sense of humor. Glad you put the quotes around the terms irony and sarcasm, as if yourself you agree that it is far away from not being funny to slam the OP about allies nerfs. :/ On Topic: Keep the T70 the way it is. Perhaps slightly increase the MP cost, but that's all that I would somehow accept as a nerf. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim HMG - Unreasonably overnerfed8 Jul 2016, 17:14 PM Jackson and Maxims have nothing in common. Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 16:49 PMMissCommissar And if we talking about PHowie - it has 6 men crew, LeIG 4. Btheir survivability is pretty equial. And same shit goes with all support crews - from HMGs to AT guns. The survive chances of Howie and LeIG are not the same; for instance LeIG provides green cover for the crew, whilst Howie does not. Crew sizes for abandon mechanism are not the same either. Nor even cold protection, for people who still play custom. I could go on, but you do not seem to understand, not even appear to accept the game mechanics. But eh, you just want to hear anything that fulfills your experience whilst ignoring everything else. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Look to the new Chart. Germans were slaughtered.8 Jul 2016, 16:45 PM From what I gather, does it mean that after the initial shock of the patch is that people start to simply adapt to the new gameplay? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T70 way too effective8 Jul 2016, 16:43 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 16:23 PMMissCommissar Allies unit performs good = time to nerf. Is that logic works in that case? Jump back to quoted post6 Jul 2016, 08:27 AMMissCommissar I think, I starting to see logic behind all this: 1. If unit of axis performs good/nice - everything OK. 2. If unit of allies performs good/nice - OP, unbalanced, nerfnerfnerf! It would be great if you didn't just interfere in any thread that discusses Soviet units with this overly aggressive tone because you disagree with the observations. I never have had any problems facing the T70 - actually, I haven't seen it much in 2on2 since the buff of the T34. Do you have any replays you could show us that denote the issue at hand? If the T70 had 400HP it might be a little bit OP, but 320 makes it rather prone to retreats after the first 160dmg were given. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim HMG - Unreasonably overnerfed8 Jul 2016, 16:27 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 16:13 PMMissCommissar In general my idea - more men doesn't equial to more survivable. It may work so for line infantry, but doesn't work with support weapons. [...]And be sure - 4 or 6 men is not such big difference You're just ignoring replies again to spread what you think is true because of your quote experience quote, completely ignoring in-game mechanism. Let me quote the relevant posts again for you: Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 03:46 AMTobis No it doesn't, the mgs all have identical received accuracy at 1.25. Stop spreading lies. Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 07:02 AMJohnSmith ALL MGs have the exact identical recieved accuracy of 1.25. Furthermore, two additional members DO make a difference. Go ask any USF player what they think of the crewsize of the Pack Howitzer. You keep creating solutions for problems that do not even exist. This is just a re-hash of your previous thread on USSR Bunkers and Maxims and Conscripts and Maxims, whilst completely stampeding on any replies that do not fit your views. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim HMG - Unreasonably overnerfed8 Jul 2016, 07:02 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 03:32 AMMissCommissar 6 men squad may be good boost for infantry squads, but not for support weapons. Maxim dying as good (and even better) as all other HMG teams, because artillery wipes 6 men squads same good as 4 men (they all prefer to bunch up nearby and dying easy), and each model itself in squad has bigger than common recived accuracy stat, so - they also dying fast from direct fire. ALL MGs have the exact identical recieved accuracy of 1.25. You are, and always will be completely wrong on the topic that a larger MG support weapon squad size is worse than a smaller one. I lost count on how many times you have been told this this in-game, in the shout-box and in the forum. Get over it, and please do stop repeating that statement to get some traction, it really confuses the passing-by readers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Any reason for it?30 Jun 2016, 00:13 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 22:05 PMStug life ????????icould do a shit post long 2 page would dat make it the best argument ?I gave you the stats told you were p4 is lacking and why is not effective You gave me a url where to find unit stats but not an argument why it is lacking. I gladly accept you writing what you call a two long page shit post.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Any reason for it?29 Jun 2016, 19:56 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 19:45 PMStug life http://www.stat.coh2.hu/squad.php?filename=panzer_iv_squad_mp http://www.stat.coh2.hu/squad.php?filename=cromwell_mk4_75mm_squad_mp Take your time bro(if you want you can look at tech cost too) Kat took his time to explain his points, why don't you? So far, he got the best arguments. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Any reason for it?29 Jun 2016, 19:42 PM Well, I haven't seen anything that uses stats to denote your point. Feel free to do so. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Any reason for it?29 Jun 2016, 19:26 PM Has this thread turned into a katitof hate thread because he's was the only one to actually bother using game stats? In: COH2 Balance