Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
USF nades don't insta-kill mg crew either. And you don't have to move survived mg from burning building. USF had some problems dealing with well placed mgs.
Posts: 1527
Permanently Banned
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
Posts: 515
Posts: 420
I will simply lol at anyone expecting such a change to a 2 year old general use infantry.
Equally possible are pershing for USF, IS-3 for soviets or ober nerf for OKW.
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Guys, don't forget that the USF actually has to purchase the mortar
Posts: 1705
Posts: 1273
1 Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
inb4 people start saying they need a sniper.
Posts: 378
I got a better idea!
BEEP BEEP
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
I got even better idea!
BAAM BAAM
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
As to the mortar... it's still just a mortar. It's not like the Soviet mortar is Ostheer's kryptonite and I don't see how the USF one is any different. If your sole answer to USF was "exploit USF general inability to deal with early MG42 wall without grenades" then its more about adapting than USF being OP with new mortar.
Posts: 1273
Which is to say, use Snipers.
Posts: 794
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Insert circular response here
Use quick M20 then!
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 21
Yes T1 USF Mortars are overpowered, they shouldnt have any counters to buildings or MG's in the early game, definitely not then USF would win every game over and over
I also think the MG42 damage should be buffed by 100% so that it can actually kill infantry instead of just suppressing them, it should also be able to shoot flanking squads instead of being limited to an arc and having to reposition when a unit is flanking it
Posts: 621
This is some kind of joke post, right?
 |
|
|
61 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
254 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
