Profile of JohnSmith

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1273

General Information


Thread: Rifles can win MG42 frontal9 Jun 2020, 11:59 AM Were you the guy who just ragequit as my teammate after his MG42 was flanked by 1+1 Rifleman saying how shit the balance is? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF M20 dead?8 Jun 2020, 12:34 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2020, 12:10 PMaerafield Very good, this matches my suggestions too Yeah, you had good suggestions in your opening thread!!! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF M20 dead?8 Jun 2020, 09:21 AM I profoundly doubt that the solution of fixing the M20 is by introducing further nerfs to the unit. It needs buffs, and reverts to its glorious days, things like reduce the build time, reduce the fuel cost by 5, reintroduce bazooka crews... etc. It's already dead on arrival, no need to kick it in the ribs again with further nerfs. Don't nerf it further. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF M20 dead?4 Jun 2020, 08:45 AM The M20 is dead, it is now on the pile of units that shall never used again. It is better to ignore it and invest into either Tech or AAHT. We got to a point that it is better to pick to SOV/UKF instead of USF (2on2). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment2 Jun 2020, 09:44 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2020, 09:39 AMmiragefla but needing 80 seconds on a paid ability I believe hinders the unit far too much. That is a much valid point; the change of timing & cost was a bit too much of a kneejerk response back then when the unit was nerfed. A change in rotation will also not result in the unit being used as infantry crusher, which is massively exaggerated, and numerous points are ignored which result in invalid arguments or points vacuum/excel sheets treatments (furthermore, the M10 which the changes are compared to, had crews, which helped to quickly repair on the field to aggressively pursue infantry crushing. USF also had other differences, which are ignored or falsified). Also I suspect that people in the thread are residing too much on the usual "why is this allies unit buffed, but not my axis unit" line of thought. Furthermore, the traditional quarrel between a couple of users is overly tiring. I'd support all the changes for the next mod patch [Fall release?] In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 - A Slight Adjustment2 Jun 2020, 08:42 AM I really like the changes proposed in the opening thread. The unit deserves another good modification to make it viable again to adapt to evergoing changes in the game. Don't let yourself be discouraged from the few unorthodox person. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M3A1, can we talk about IT ?27 May 2020, 10:45 AM The unit is generally best avoided, and the 15 fuel are to be invested elsewhere. It is just a resource trap. It has some use in 1on1/2on2 if you opponent goes heavy or double sniper play, but nobody does that anymore. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Campaign Won't Start.27 May 2020, 10:26 AM I played the campaign again out of curiosity in January; it's one of the few things in the game that did not age well at all. Best keep with AA!! In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Conscrits AT Package25 May 2020, 22:55 PM I think the whole community would agree on that was the reason of the change, and not the other way around which is a total wreck of disinformation. Its not relevant to the thread. Nonetheless, the winds of meta has shifted, and some units and commanders have really fallen out of the playstyle. I kinda wish there was a way to give underused units a little more oompf again. I recall some of the soviet AT conscript focused commanders being announced as a gamer changer back then, and they disappeared as quickly as they appeared. In: Lobby
Thread: This patch litteraly ruined the game.5 May 2020, 12:00 PM Oof, there is so much wrong in the opening thread post. Dude, you shouldn't rage post in the forums after losing the game. Edit: I just noticed the other posts in the thread.. big oof In: COH2 Balance