Let's not sugar coat things now, any skill level can have a good idea, and sure low skill levels such as those who play 4v4 randoms and lose are allowed an opinion, they just make an ass of themselves in doing so.
I personally see no constructive points being made in this thread anymore but it is an interesting thread at that.
Iv always suggested this site to have player cards mandatory, you know, to flush out the morons. Guess it would cancel out half the fan base tho. It's one thing to be a fanboy, it's another to be a noob fanboy.. and it's a whole different category when your a 4v4 random noob fanboy.. |
You might want to give usf some early at options do deal with kubel spam. You can easily bully usf off of fuel points with 2 kubels in maps like steppes. This strategy, when successful, has a snowballing effect for okw. If someone is brainlessly spamming one unit and beating you, something is wrong with counter play.
So you want to fix usf's late game? How to you propose you do that?
Kubel spam in 4v4? You mean to tell me you don't have a single ally to build an m3 or infantry carriers from the British? That's on you and your team not having communication, synergy, and strat adjustment.
Let this be an example on problems of 4v4 persons commenting on balance. If you and your team go 4 USF then that's completely on you. So it's safe to assume your playing random, knowing that a skilled AT team can counter kubel spam easy.. smh.. |
Relax, then reread my post.
My reply is the same, if anything now I'm a bit annoyed. |
Using the fact that a lot of stuff that you wanted nerfed did get nerfed loses its credibility when the ending balance is as bad as this patch is. Look at the AT win rates in your favorite mode. Some of the units probably needed a little nerf, but not what they got.
Sim city isn't fun, but it isn't OP really, at least in 4v4. It usually just means a 40 minute game against someone who would normally lose in 15-20. If you disagree, please post a replay where you've lost to sim city.
As bad as this patch is? These last few patches has been the best this game has seen? What planet are you on right now? Sim city is going to receive a nerf or a change at the very least. And your saying I'm losing credibility by being correct on the nerfs I called out for? Wtf I was right yet I'm wrong to your eyes? Balance mods are community/stats feed back bro, from some of the best players in the game. Your making a fool of yourself right now |
You're getting hostility because you're an 90% win rate, Axis-only and all of your suggestions would just turn 90% into 100%.
PS - Saw in the shout box that you were thinking about naming your daughter Eva Braun. Even if joking, that's still kind of creepy.
I'll always repeat myself, look at all my previous comments, most I mean that most of the topics I comment on are clearly op and have been nerfed. So most of what I say is obvious. For example now, I claim sim city not fun/OP. As well as calliope. Am I bias for saying it's op or are you biased for saying it's not. Please and I mean it, I welcome anyone to look at all my previous post. What I say is Op has been nerfed or is widely known is OP. So I'm not some nonsenced biased axis fanboy who is blind to the cause.
P.S. don't know what my kid is yet it's way to early to tell, and I was joking about the name thing glad someone caught on. Part of the axis fanboy bs that goes around. Tho unlike others I admit it. I let my rank do the talking.. |
I am so tired of your posts, you contribute nothing to the discussion, you only put effort into derailing it. You had no knowledgable insight into teamplay balance, you only try to discourage others from making a change. I'm guessing you're scared that the game will become harder for you if they nerf some of the op axis strats. I have one request, stop posting if you dont want to contribute any valuable information on the topic.
I held the number 1 spot for 4v4 AT for a long time, and if I remember correctly we had somewhere in the neighborhood of 128 games won straight, even longer for top 2-3. Just because I stopped playing 4v4 doesn't mean I don't know how it is. And that was the days when it was extreamly competitive still. 2v2 is my main area now and I often flirt with being top 50-75. So yes I do know how team games are As well as some insite on balance. I also know that 95% of the games played in 4v4 was against completely lost noobs. It became so much of a problem I was tired from coming home from work to just waste my time beating morons all day. Maybe 1 game a day was against a good team due to them having communication meaning AT, a well developed and adjustable strat, and awareness to detail. I also know that a lot of those people who my team stomped on in 15 min are the ones who come on the forums and bitch. So yea my post is helpful in pointing that out. |
The people who are saying rank isn't relivant and supporting such claims are he 4v4 randoms who have a phone book long rank. Those who don't adjust strats, as well as the obvious, lack of synergy within the team.
It does matter. In fact it's extreamly important, you think someone who doesn't know the core mechanics of the game such as stopping a tank before it fires, or that cover is directional, for example; should have a balance opinion?
Yes and no, everyone has the right to an opinion, but the weight is very little for some.
I mean take the guy who posted about OKW sim city being worse then British sim city, like yea that's an opinion, but those who know.....know..... |
Oh,yes. OP stuka and Axis simcity are poisoning every game. Especially the lefh is seriously overpowered when compare to the ML120 since there isn't any dirt cheap Stuka diving bomb with munition drop implemented in every commander on ally side.
P.S. Team rank top 10
OP stuka? Lol every month something is different |
shocks, assgren, assengs dont do it. why does SP
SMGs<Assault Rifles |
Personally I see that pretty even and not extream bias, strictly going off own opinion and not numbers, Seems to me he plays both reasonably, but has a favorite as do most people on this game. |