Profile of BeltFedWombat

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID United Kingdom
Posts: 951

General Information
Email: znqrhcrznvy(wgl)farnxlznvy.bet
Register Time: 4 Feb 2013, 18:44 PM
Twitter: @AirfixPanzer
Residence:

United Kingdom
Nationality:

United Kingdom
Timezone: Europe/London
Game Name: AirfixPanzer

Show Latest Posts


Thread: HOLY POTATOES !!! patch 3/2525 Mar 2014, 13:52 PM ^ I think you missed the sarcasm. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to further improve coh213 Mar 2014, 14:53 PM How many purely Ost / Sov players are there? I play both and I suspect most of the rest of us do too. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Penal Battalion anyone?10 Mar 2014, 01:59 AM This thread is full of really great ideas for this unit, which doesn't seem to realise it's potential. A slight armour buff and a slight MP cost reduction might make this a more viable unit for me. In fact, given the usefulness of their rifles it might be balanced by removing the flame upgrade. That would give Sovs a non-doctrinal, viable T1 infantry unit that (at about 320 MP) can form the basis of a solid early game without being OP. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T4 and the Panther4 Mar 2014, 19:38 PM Although it's evened out slightly, it's still noticeably more people who play Germans. They can't be that bad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS2 are you kidding me?3 Mar 2014, 09:51 AM Panthers, with their ludicrous turbo-chargers, can warp around unsupported. Soviet heavy tanks, which lumber about like sclerotic dinosaurs, require a retinue of babysitters. Like I say I play both factions. I happily spam warp-panthers. They are, however, the best tank in the game and cheap at the price. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS2 are you kidding me?2 Mar 2014, 22:33 PM I play both factions. IS-2 is crap. Panthers eat it for breakfast. If you are fielding infantry against it, OTOH, you just brought a knife to a gunfight. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I am a Noob ... a perspective28 Feb 2014, 14:15 PM Gary, I've been playing since 2007 IIRC and I'm still a n00b. Keep on truckin' d00d. In: Lobby
Thread: T4 and the Panther28 Feb 2014, 10:20 AM OK point taken. I shot from the hip there, I apologize. But if Relic is going to offer 3 v 3 and 4 v 4 it isn't on to just say "hell, we ain't balancing that " Of course, if Relic acknowledged that larger games are different (as per loads of posts asking for that) and scaled accordingly then this wouldn't be an issue. As it stands the game is balanced for a small minority. Seems ass backwards. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: T4 and the Panther28 Feb 2014, 07:21 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2014, 08:59 AMGinnungagap P.S. large games / 4v4s go just apeshit, i would't even bother to balance that mess. Should those of us who like larger games and would like to think the developers might consider us in balance decisions just fuck off then? Bit of a problem, really, 1 v 1 WonderBoy. We're the majority. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New battle servers - goodbye to coh2 for bad comps?27 Feb 2014, 10:03 AM No sympathy for laggers and people on dial-up. In: COH2 Gameplay