Profile of easierwithaturret

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 247

General Information


Thread: M42 AT gun, brainstorm and solutions8 Aug 2016, 23:08 PM Just give it better accuracy and aim time so it can work against light vehicles, allowing for a t1 start that doesn't require you choosing the 1 or 2 good doctrines with guards. Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2016, 14:20 PMRiCE The faction already has a reliable AT gun, and TDs in every size and color. Its just overkill.. Soviets are no need of another doctrinal AT gun. Just remove it.. Or just this. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call-in infantry5 Aug 2016, 01:08 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2016, 23:53 PMsinthe Are you top 200 or better? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson5 Aug 2016, 01:06 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2016, 00:31 AMStug life M10 has to say otherwise I guess M10 is something of an exception since its low cost makes it somewhat expendable. Even then it's a niche unit, suitable only to a few maps/builds. In: Lobby
Thread: M36 Jackson5 Aug 2016, 00:29 AM This unit has worked well since Relic finally accepted that the concept of a flanking TD doesn't work in this game. In: Lobby
Thread: Let's Talk: Sd.Kfz. 2224 Aug 2016, 23:32 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2016, 22:32 PMZombiFrancis So like a lone capping tommie squad or penal battalion a 222 can push off, but take damage enough to need repairs from pioneers. I guess you could call that cost effective. It also cant recap or stall the squad either so that pio pretty much has to go along in that situation. I dunno I find that the 222 is still pretty awkward in that it's entire pupose is to currently shut down allies rushing a light vehicle for shock value. I don't think that is its best role or even a good one, but I would not call that gimmicky usage OP. That's the gist of the problem, it got the health buff so it could be pressed into service as an early AT unit to compensate for the trouble OH was having with that. If the AI capabilities are buffed the cost will need to increase, potentially making it too expensive to serve in that makeshift AT role. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketenwerfer is awful4 Aug 2016, 23:29 PM The stats are fine when you consider the tier of the unit and its other capabilities. The problem is the unit's inconsistency, sometimes it doesn't fire when it should and the shots often clip the ground. I'm ok with terrain blocking shots but when it only affects some weapons that's not so good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penalties for abusive /quit .4 Aug 2016, 04:02 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2016, 01:37 AMGrumpy The game client tries to reconnect when it disconnects. Your units stop, the game freezes, and you get a status update on the left. Depending on what is happening, you can end up losing the game anyway even with a reconnect. On a reconnect, your client moves in turbo mode until everything is caught up. Oh yeah of course there's that, you still get permanently disconnected if you don't reestablish connection within a short space of time. If your connection issue requires you to restart your router, you're boned. I thought you were talking about a feature that enables players to rejoin a match in progress after they've been booted from it, that would be useful in team games. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Advanced British Trench Facilities3 Aug 2016, 23:28 PM I don't think they should be capturable. That worked in CoH1, but in CoH2 where grenades are used more it wouldn't. What they should do is make them easier to destroy when not occupied and/or adding the ability to 'decap' like with a forward HQ. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Talk: Sd.Kfz. 2223 Aug 2016, 23:06 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2016, 19:42 PMjoebill Put a 221 in tier 1, and slap the sniper in tier 2. Upgrade to 222 after tier 2 is unlocked. This wouldn't work, what are allies going to do against a t0 turreted vehicle? The kubel is fine because it's not that strong in combat and can be circled at close range, but that wouldn't apply to a 221. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penalties for abusive /quit .3 Aug 2016, 03:30 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2016, 02:57 AMGrumpy Some of us don't have a choice. At my home, I have a choice of Comcast or Comcast. It's craptastic. It isn't likely to change as Comcast regularly gives "dollars of free speech" to our elected officials so that there is very little chance of anything changing. I get to pay about $75/month for a connection that drops me from games completely roughly 5-10% of the time. I sympathise in that I too often have to deal with an unreliable connection. As annoying as it is to get dropouts I don't feel as if a system that made it harder to access ranked team matches during times of instability is infringing my rights. I know every time I drop out it is spoiling the game for the other 3-7 players. Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2016, 02:57 AMGrumpy The game servers do have a reconnect feature that does work. I feel pretty stupid here, what is this reconnect feature you mention? In: COH2 Gameplay