Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Lack of credible defensive option11 Apr 2015, 23:35 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 23:27 PMTobis I like your idea of being able to tow AT guns. You are desperately trying to back your AT gun up from the incoming blob of infantry, but you don't make it and they abandon the AT gun. Que the M20 coming in to save the day and drag the AT gun back to safety. Too bad they will never add this. That actually sounds like a pretty bad idea for now 'cause then an M20 rush which took out an AT gun will be stealing it easily too! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Lack of credible defensive option11 Apr 2015, 22:03 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 21:59 PMKothre I'd like every faction to have sandbags, but beyond that, I'm not so sure. If they were to add Japan, I'd support them having some really nice defensive options, but I wouldn't want heavy emplacements for every faction. I think it would make the game too campy. It'd be nice if sandbags didn't die instantly from tanks to make the time building them not get flushed away nearly instantly. Just one more hit, all I ask. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: is2 and tiger ace11 Apr 2015, 21:46 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 21:44 PMLosttruppen IS2 and Tigers as a unit are fine imo, my gripe is with the call in meta, allowing easy replacement and reinforcement of heavy tanks. I still want flanking their rear armour to work for mediums and not bounce a third of the time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer, the never ending struggle11 Apr 2015, 21:08 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 21:03 PMQueenRatchet123 I dont want to discredit lemon but. double mg's works in usf's favor and strength A good player will know how to use smoke and gain almost all the map. fighting pits will fuck up the mg's, also a flak ht rush or m20 will force the mg;s to retreat. giving usf player enough time to tech and build fighting pits. I saw a top 200 player try double mg's against me. game was 28 minutes and both mg's were mine my advice is to ggren spam into one mg get HT and pressure cuttoff being overly defensive against the most aggresive faction the game might wwork for 20 games. But,, i guarantee it wont vs usf players that know what they are doing Isn't waiting for HT enough time for Wehrmacht to get a Pak out and probably bunker their fuel though? I certainly know M20 rush is going to mess up HMGs. Double HMGs is definitely useless on the WFA-release 1v1 maps though. Waaaaaaayyyyyyyy too many buildings. The design of many of the maps is definitely another sore spot in Wehr early-game woes. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Lack of credible defensive option11 Apr 2015, 21:04 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 21:00 PMelchino7 Give more/better defensive options to the community defensive commanders. That's it. Pleasssssseeeeeeeeeeeeee make them good Which would also probably require making heavies in general not broken, SO WIN-WIN! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer, the never ending struggle11 Apr 2015, 20:52 PM Well, to be fair Lemon, we aren't all Korean gamers. Positive stereotypes aside, I certainly like 2 HMG42s against USF as well - Gren spam feels like suicide against USF, for one...I'm definitely not as good as Lemon but I've been through most of what was just stated and agree with it. Haven't given the new Sniper a go yet, but the Pioneer sight buff certainly makes microing 2 HMG42s a lot more feasible. I've definitely won enough USF games with M20 rushes though to not think Wehrmacht don't need teching costs reductions. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: PTRS is now an anti-infantry and anti tank rifle11 Apr 2015, 19:05 PM Clearly, Relic listened to everyone complain about OKW and USF blobbing and decided to share the love for the Soviets. In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: okw munis cost11 Apr 2015, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 17:34 PMAlexzandvar (Not to mention this is like saying to a Soviet player that Cons shouldn't get PPsH because shocks and guards exist) Well, they more or less kinda shouldn't because it ain't all that great... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?11 Apr 2015, 17:40 PM Could also just make the officers ability-based like the Major. Just, you know...not exactly like the Major whose a walking retreat point while the rest of his traits are largely overpriced garbage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Urban Tactics Forward Hq Issue11 Apr 2015, 17:20 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 16:14 PMJason You can't be serious dude. To constantly have one of the weakest commanders in my line-up to counter a 0CP ability. Not cool. You ain't referring to Spearhead, right? Jump back to quoted post11 Apr 2015, 16:39 PMFaustCostBulletin I'm personally not very happy about how the only way you can use this doctrine is to be very aggressive with it and get it up at your enemy's territory or very close and then spam it, hogging all the resources to delay the many counters to it. I would be okay with friendly territory only if the buildings were repairable and had higher maximum health when used as HQs. I guess they could in turn be limited to one... But a straight nerf is out of the question as there are already many counters. Totally in agreement. When I hear "Urban Defence Tactics" I think of troops stubbornly holding ground, making the enemy pay for every inch of territory. I don't think of cheesing the shit out of a match by immediately running into the enemy's cutoff. In: COH2 Gameplay