Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Ostheer HMG too strong now28 Jun 2015, 08:26 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2015, 07:48 AMMr. Someguy The MG 42 could raised to 280 Manpower. I don't want it to get nerfed again though, it actually stops mindless blobs and Ooralotovs now. I'd rather pay more for a weapon that does its job, than to pay less for one that doesn't. I'd also agree that's probably the way to go about it. Reducing the suppression would probably meet with backlash since 95% of mentions about HMG42s were complaining it didn't suppress well enough...but I'd still doubt it's completely fine as is now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: US need more now.28 Jun 2015, 08:24 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2015, 08:13 AMskemshead Well it depends on what stats a USF mortar would have but in my experience, gens are more prone to getting squadwiped than an mg42. Most people will use a mortar to blindly bombard an mg position, resulting in the mg simply repositioning. And Grens are far more capable of repositioning and keeping away from mortar fire what with the lack of any set-up and tear-down times, are they not? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer HMG too strong now28 Jun 2015, 05:02 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2015, 04:29 AMPuppetmaster Von Ivans new MG42 Meta (Build 7 of them!) So...did he win? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: US need more now.27 Jun 2015, 14:54 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2015, 13:47 PMskemshead If you think a mortar is going to worry a mg42 that is supported by halftrack then your going to be disappointed. A mortar will be more effective vs grens. ...I don't see how Grens with a 251 will die any worse than an HMG42 with a 251. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why No Maxim Buff?27 Jun 2015, 14:49 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2015, 13:41 PMskemshead if you were to flank it with cc units it can just pack up and retreat. Axis would be mainly confined to using indirect fire. That's every HMG crew. None are automatically wiped with support/retreating the moment someone goes into them. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzer IV vs Stug 27 Jun 2015, 14:49 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2015, 11:27 AMTensaiOni It's near accuracy is bugged currently, 0.6 instead of 0.06 (unless that's what Relic wanted to do). It's mid and far accuracy are correct (0.05 and 0.04) though I'm not entirely sure if mid accuracy is used if mid range value is missing. So Stug might be less accurate at longer ranges than my site suggests. Ah, I thought it saw it hit a lot more than I expected running it into Shocks. In: Lobby
Thread: Eastern Front 2.30027 Jun 2015, 03:15 AM Sounds baller, of course. In: COH Central
Thread: m1919 rifles are overperforming 26 Jun 2015, 23:07 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 21:03 PMWhat Doth Life?! Defensive stance outside of combat for all LMG wielding units could be interesting. Conceptually, yes, but they'd all need a ton of changes to make that work (Mostly in at least requiring a damage nerf into the ground). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why No Maxim Buff?26 Jun 2015, 23:05 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 21:52 PMAchtAchter Maxim has not this turn rate anymore, it can be easily flanked. That's pretty much my opinion. Real problem with Maxim spam was they could easily reposition onto flankers and suppress them too - the horizontal traverse nerf fixed that, they cannot shoot at a microed flanker any more. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: m1919 rifles are overperforming 26 Jun 2015, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 17:30 PMTheDesertFox People people, why all the confusion... the best offense is a strong defense. ...You magnificent bastard. In: COH2 Balance