Profile of TensaiOni

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 198

General Information


Thread: Snipers, Enemy Squad Sizes, and Rate of Fire18 Jul 2015, 12:29 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2015, 12:01 PMsherlock Since everyone goes all Stephen Colbert on this problem (going with one's gut feeling), I took the liberty to look at the stats to maybe provide some material for a more informed discussion. Why "magazine size" - 1? If nothing has changed, a squad can take "magazine size" + 1 shots before reloading. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzer IV vs Stug 27 Jun 2015, 13:49 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2015, 11:51 AMTrubbbel Did you report it? It sounds like it should be reported. Yes, but it makes me think if Q&A exists at Relic at all. In: Lobby
Thread: Panzer IV vs Stug 27 Jun 2015, 11:27 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2015, 12:49 PMTrubbbel So spreadsheet is not up to date, and funny thing is, when I look at old stats, stug seems pretty cool (just less armor/health and fixed gun). And now the Stug is stronger so what are the comparative data now? Or isn't it king? Edit: Should maybe have been posted in balance? Stug weapon stats It's near accuracy is bugged currently, 0.6 instead of 0.06 (unless that's what Relic wanted to do). It's mid and far accuracy are correct (0.05 and 0.04) though I'm not entirely sure if mid accuracy is used if mid range value is missing. So Stug might be less accurate at longer ranges than my site suggests. Another thing is that they've changed AoE radius, but kept old AoE far/mid/near distance values. Again, I'm not 100% positive on how it's calculated, but it would suggest that it does 100% damage in 0.5 radius, instead of it dropping much earlier like in other TDs (like for example SU-85) - so it one shots infantry in 0.5 radius vs ~0.17 in case of other TDs. Those bugs are probably making Stug somewhat over performing vs infantry. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch Analysis (Hidden Changes)27 Jun 2015, 11:16 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2015, 17:12 PMCruzz My list, of which some versions I already posted in twitch chats earlier but this should more or less be final. http://pastebin.com/d3ST0xr8 One note about the Stug - it's almost 100% a typo by Relic, but it's near accuracy is 0.6 not 0.06. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: m1919 rifles are overperforming 25 Jun 2015, 11:41 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2015, 11:49 AMKatitof I believe he meant BARs. People need to be more specific as both, M1919 and BARs are brownings. Sorry, I think I cut too much from his quote, since the line started with "This commander sucks overall..." and I though such comment in M1919 thread made it pretty obvious which "browning" he meant. And vet3 rifles with BARs would probably lose against vet3 LMG grens at absolute max range. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: m1919 rifles are overperforming 24 Jun 2015, 11:07 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2015, 02:25 AMJadame! [...] vet3 2 brownings rifles BARELY beat vet3 lmg grens (at least on long range) Well, that's really surprising, considering that LMG42 is ~3% more effective than M1919 at long range, while rifles get two of them. Even considering worse veterancy bonuses for rifles (+30% vs +40% on grens), at long range they have ~33% more DPS in 2 M1919 vs 1 LMG42 situation. But maybe I'm missing something. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch Analysis (Hidden Changes)24 Jun 2015, 08:47 AM ~~For mother russia accuracy bonus was changed from 1.5 to 1.25.~~ Nevermind, I'm blind Some accuracy value was changed from 1.25 to 1.5, but it looks like something that's completely unused. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CoH2 Stats24 Jun 2015, 00:15 AM Page once again updated - there might be some bugs, depending on how Relic (and if they actually did it) modified the data. New site version will be released this month/early next month, with a lot of improvements. In: Lobby
Thread: The OKW conundrum19 Jun 2015, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2015, 08:34 AMBeefSurge And Paratroopers, I think. In terms of DPS, paratrooper is about equal to a grenadier - he'd have more dps up close (~60% more) but less further (~20% less). Upgrades not included. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Basic Infantry Combat15 Jun 2015, 09:45 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2015, 02:34 AMdaspoulos There is also another thing people need to take into consideration with this though. Its a great tool, but flat dps doesn't always mean everything. Take into account overall squad health and received accuracy. For example One squad may have more dps at a certain range but have 2 less men or something like that. The main purpose of this tool, in it's current simplified form, is only to let people check optimal range for their infantry vs infantry fights (since weapon profile don't change, no matter how many effective HP a squad has, it's received accuracy or veterancy bonuses) not to check which squad would win in said fights. In: COH2 Gameplay