Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: 50. Cal and Vickers vs OKW15 Dec 2015, 21:21 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2015, 21:19 PMnodickwilliams The very thought of ww1 garbage being better than the mg42 for 20 mp more is amusing. Then make it 260MP, not complicated. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 50. Cal and Vickers vs OKW15 Dec 2015, 21:12 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2015, 20:55 PMLemonJuice People also make it sound like the Vickers can't suppress for shit but I find it able to suppress on the 2nd burst most of the time. See though, that's what people thought about the HMG42 when it did that too...though I more find the Vickers suppresses slower and takes more of its first burst to do so compared to the HMG42 rather than requiring 2 bursts generally. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank destroyers - Shoot on infantry or not?15 Dec 2015, 02:23 AM I'll only do that if it has MGs. If it doesn't, I will never have them shoot at infantry unless I'm absolutely, completely, entirely certain that nothing AT-capable can head over to it, which isn't going to be very often. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove shell shock14 Dec 2015, 22:46 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2015, 22:39 PMSwitzerland These abilities should all move to a skill shot like the Pershing ability. I personally rather like when TWP targeted a point on the ground rather than changing the weapon to a TWP weapon. Felt like an appropriate drawback to such an potent ability to me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do you prefer the "new" OKW or the "original" OKW?14 Dec 2015, 01:53 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Dec 2015, 01:41 AMMr. Someguy Not sure what you mean by "remove pop out elite infantry, rng to stuka barrage", but putting Battlegroup in HQ would make the forward reinforcement point useless. 30MP for Volks will only work if Volks are actually really good, 30MP is the cost of Grenadiers and Soviet Guards. I believe some one was snidely insinuating to turn OKW into Wehrmacht. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we discuss the PIAT?14 Dec 2015, 00:30 AM Hm, all right, thanks boys. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we discuss the PIAT?14 Dec 2015, 00:11 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2015, 23:57 PMMr. Someguy I think the PIAT should have good accuracy / low scatter, but no ability to track. But I'm pretty sure accuracy is what causes projectiles to track? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Weak Ostwind13 Dec 2015, 23:50 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2015, 23:42 PMcr4wler yep... and the centaur was facing a 6 man squad, something it will NEVER face. Prosttruppen and Panzerfusiliers do, in fact, exist. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What happened to the M8 Scott?13 Dec 2015, 05:25 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2015, 05:05 AMUnited See the Ostwind thread -no window of opportunity -inconsistent damage Well, it's not as bad as the Ostwind to micro though since it doesn't have to out-range handheld AT by 5 meters and snares potentially by 10 meters. It's not as good when it kites infantry from 50 range instead of 40 range, but it'll still probably do something over nothing. ...aside from having half its health when you do fail to kite right. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfüsiliere as OKW T2 stock unit13 Dec 2015, 04:27 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2015, 18:44 PMJespe If that Mg42 owner has a half of a brain placing and microing MG42 not a single chance. It needs a third window switch to get near enough to take out the mg. It can keep those 2 sides down until Grens/pios come to mop that squad away. If you've got half of a brain yourself, you can approach the MG outside of the firing arc but close to another side of the building so when the MG goes to set-up on the flanker's side, the flanker then can go a side the MG won't be able to shoot at while its setting up to where they were before and then nade it. That was harder when Maxims and M2HBs set-up much faster in buildings, but now that is easily feasible against all single HMGs in a building. In: COH2 Balance