Profile of Vuther

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Return Rifle Company vet call in with fuel cost?24 Dec 2015, 04:01 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2015, 03:56 AMThoseDeafMutes I feel like the description was left over from before they decided to make them close range experts. Yeah, it's pretty conspicuous in AA where the description's the same, but their small arms can only automatically be Thompsons. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Return Rifle Company vet call in with fuel cost?24 Dec 2015, 03:39 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Dec 2015, 03:36 AMWhat Doth Life?! Sidenote: I find it funny and painfully lazy that Rangers are described as "marksmanship experts" and they have carbines. If you can be about as accurate at long distances with a round with half the energy, you must be pretty good! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Combined arms versus blobbing: Quo vadis Relic? 24 Dec 2015, 03:36 AM Pretty sure suppressing weapons already cause more suppression against units in negative cover. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: IS 2 problem 24 Dec 2015, 00:37 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 23:34 PMFiresparks that rear mounted mg is useless. Since when do IS2 face their rear toward enemy? When they see a mortar crew and can decide they want to shit all over it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Close the pocket23 Dec 2015, 23:10 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 22:55 PMwhitesky00 Stormtroopers need lasers and white armor. PEW PEW! Game always could use more wilheim scream. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lightning War Doctrine suggestion23 Dec 2015, 20:14 PM Isn't the doctrine already about as good as it gets? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: IS 2 problem 23 Dec 2015, 03:00 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 02:48 AMFiresparks IS2 was fine up to the point where the tiger and king tiger got a massive buff. right now the tiger have superior range and penetration. The is2 could use a buff to keep up with the king tiger and tiger, but this is how power creep happen. They really shouldn't have touched the range of them. They can't give the IS-2 the same range back, since that would massively mess up its use against 50 range units, which Axis has got a fair amount of. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS 2 problem 23 Dec 2015, 02:28 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 02:05 AMferwiner "whatever killer" is more like "Pizdets vsemu" so rather su-100, but yeah, animal killer "zveroboy" was su-152. The "whatever" portion was really just me being silly about how I've seen it translated as both animal and beast. Naturally, it doesn't really matter which of the two one chooses to use. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS 2 problem 23 Dec 2015, 02:06 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 02:05 AMferwiner 4. Ballance is more important that history. In history the tank was also very inaccurate and due to 2 part ammo it took long to reload and best known types of ammunition couldnt be used limiting possible penetration. We had IS-2 as historical as it gets designed with those features in mind but it was so much rng everybody decided it wasnt good. So now it has limited damage but it got better acc and reload while keeping it superior armour, both front and rear. Well, at that point its pen was awful, so it was still like half and half in historical-ness. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS 2 problem 23 Dec 2015, 02:02 AM The IS-2 is a superior at AT compared to AI, actually. Also, you got a fun fact mixed up - it was the ISU-152, and its predecessor the SU-152 that had the nickname "beast/animal/whatever killer/slayer" Zveroboy. In: COH2 Balance