Profile of kitekaze

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 378

General Information


Thread: Tank Destroyer Time to Kill stats18 Sep 2016, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2016, 13:20 PMSiphon X. The list shows time-to-kill in seconds, not DPS. The M10 needs more time, and therefore is worse than the Jackson. Well, I misread. My bad, sorry. But the title should be fixed, I kept reading and assumed that OP try to talk about Tank Destroyer and DPS. Also, I want to ask if OP can add KV-2 to the list. It actually destroy tank quite well. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tank Destroyer Time to Kill stats18 Sep 2016, 13:16 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2016, 00:05 AMMr.Smith Stats at Max range: Code vs IS2: TD NAME (Sight/max range) VET0 (seconds) VET3/VET5(JP4) M10 112.0 - 147.099 80.85 - 105.84 Jackson (40-45/60) 67.125 - 96.625 30.48 - 45.34 vs King Tiger: M10 (35/50) 129.54 - 164.64 95.85 - 120.84 Jackson (40-45/60) 81.875 - 111.37 40.39 - 50.29 Stats at range 50 (Pershing is at 45): Code vs IS2: M10 112.00 - 147.10 80.85 - 105.85 Jackson 59.75 - 89.25 30.48 - 40.39 vs King Tiger: M10 129.55 - 164.65 82.93 - 104.53 Jackson 74.50 - 104.00 22.35 - 25.95 Did I read its wrong?? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tank Destroyer Time to Kill stats18 Sep 2016, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2016, 00:05 AMMr.Smith DPS alone is not the only thing account for being tank destroyer. You should take ability, durability, range and purchase cost factors as well. You know something seriously wrong when you write that M10 is better than Jackson when fighting with King Tiger. And I don't know why no list for ISU, Elefant or Jagdtiger? (Did I misread the title?) Why there is pershing, but not churchill? After I read your post, I feel like what you try to claim is "axis tank is under-power, buff plz". In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Limit rocket artillery to 1x per player?11 Sep 2016, 13:47 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2016, 13:12 PMOmega_Warrior Why do you say that? In my experience the calliope feels more potent Calliope only good against late game infantry blob but USF player who utilize Priest commander can make pressure through the whole game. The phosphor round from MTHT is a pain, its smoke also render mg to the point of useless while its flame prevent axis troop from cover. Late game priest laugh at OST bunker and OKW truck. Not to mention they can use defensive cover AND M1919A6 (Who need scout plane when major can do the same?) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Limit rocket artillery to 1x per player?11 Sep 2016, 12:53 PM I actually feel relief when my opponent carries Calliope commander. My last experience says that any USF player using Priest commander is much, much more dangerous. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: way to separate USF disembark & reinforce ?16 Aug 2016, 12:53 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Aug 2016, 12:41 PMtroyquigley no f = reinforce f = disembark r = retreat r = reverse Gridkey? In: Lobby
Thread: (OKW Recon Pass)23 Jul 2016, 10:28 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2016, 07:52 AMOmega_Warrior Apparently I need to put out a PSA because no one seems to actually realize it exists. USF HAS A DOCTRINAL SINGLE RECON STRAFE FOR 60 MUNITIONS AND 4 CP I know it's in 2 of the worse commanders in the game, but come on guys Different from CAS counterpart, Recon strafe target a single spot instead of a lane. So unless you are dumb enough you can avoid it easily simply by left click when red smoke is seen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Improve abandon mechanic10 Jul 2016, 05:23 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2016, 22:37 PMGenObi Honestly man just play Men AT War Assualt squad I've already played it. No such system exists. The crew damage in that game is more like current CoH2 critical mechanic. Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2016, 01:29 AMZombiFrancis I wish MoW had suppression, cover mechanics, and squads with veterancy. Ehm... you don't blob in MoW because it punishes you harshly. Cover in MoW is extremely essential for keeping unit alive. And MoW has individual veterancy (and squad vet when you group them). The only things they don't have are ability, tech tree and upgrade. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Pak 439 Jul 2016, 07:04 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2016, 05:44 AMmiragefla If the Pak 43 can't fire through buildings, then it better have brace, 4 times the amount of HP and be non-decrewable with +10 range given that thing costs an arm and a leg worth of manpower, doctrinal, immobile, dedicated to one role, and will be fired on by every source of indirect fire or simply outflanked. Yes I'm being sarcastic, but the piercing is the only way that thing is even semi decent. And 20 pop + 70 fuel. What you pay is what you get. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Improve abandon mechanic8 Jul 2016, 14:02 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 13:26 PMnee The two health bar is not that complex if the current UI is changed. It just like protoss in starcraft, you have barrier bar and health bar. The idea of resting them at base would only work for at least three run, which is rarely. Moreover, if we change healing from number to percentage, KT crew would restore as fast as a Sherman crew. In: COH2 Gameplay