Profile of TheSleep3r

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 670

General Information


Thread: USF Captain and Lieutenant Unit Behavior19 Oct 2015, 06:20 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 20:59 PMRedT3rror So, units which do something else, for the order they actually received is fine? Do you know any other RTS games which contain that logic? Every RTS ever with bad pathfinding? no but seriously, AI entities have no problems of weapons not firing until found cover (at least from my experience) and it takes very little time, and can actually help so in this case it could stay. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OH recent buffs. Justification?18 Oct 2015, 20:57 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 20:44 PMZyllen WTF tier 1 was always countered by the 221/222 . so that argument is stupid. and t-34? who gives a fuck. a fine tank for its cost but allied fanboys want to spam it. second part the su76 makes ostheer mediums even less relevant. All his arguments are simply shit all the while the okw and ost are doing very poorly because of the recent buffs to the allies. Pardon me once more, I didn't say Tier 1 wasn't countered by these vehicles, but I wanted to point out that it is quite useless at this point, if it weren't for snipers and 0-4 minute clown cars it wouldn't be seen at all. T-34 would be fine indeed if its consistency would be increased. Axis infantry has its own problems, but this is another story. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Captain and Lieutenant Unit Behavior18 Oct 2015, 20:36 PM Today I played a game where Rifles auto-seeking cover won me an engagement. I came to conclusion that it can be useful, especially when unit is going to be suppressed and the cover isn't trustworthy (Opel trucks, which are usually angled, make squads suppressed after several seconds). My suggestion: leave auto-seeking on AI units, remove it from AT units (including Guards) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OH recent buffs. Justification?18 Oct 2015, 20:30 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 20:11 PMZyllen But still invalid because the soviets and USF got some major buffs themselves. Pardon me, but nearly complete refusal of Soviet tier 1 and T-34/76 isn't really valid. I am aware that these are implications of his points and not exactly those. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is War Effort comfirmed?18 Oct 2015, 19:46 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 19:36 PMVIPUKS I wonder what will we get. War Effort, obviously In: Lobby
Thread: Is War Effort comfirmed?18 Oct 2015, 18:26 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 18:06 PMJaedrik Nigo just wants War Effort really bad and predicted the wrong reveal. Me too. Metamaps are always fun, esp. if they give us specific rewards for participation. Don't forget we'll have more reveals on 21st and 28th. In: Lobby
Thread: OH recent buffs. Justification?18 Oct 2015, 18:24 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 18:11 PMAchtAchter Coh2chart.com says different. Some of his points are correct though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British Churchill CAP?18 Oct 2015, 13:28 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2015, 11:51 AMSibirietis churchills..they are equally strong as king tiger and tiger ok then In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Allies > Axis17 Oct 2015, 18:52 PM but muh king tigers In: Lobby
Thread: Emote Request - hansWIPE17 Oct 2015, 17:47 PM I've updated the emotes. Personally I like the version with cut helmet more, but I understand it could look on Twitch rather oddly. In: Lobby