Profile of general_gawain

A molotov cost to use 20 mu a flame grenades 30 mu.

Since you are doing it again directly after I pointed out that the upfront side tech cost of soviet grenades have to be considered it seems to be pointless to discuss anything with you. Either you are not reading what I write or you are deliberately ignoring it to provoke. I don't know, but that is not the way I want to discuss. I'm out.

Bunker and emplacement are not really comparable, they have very little in common

...except that they are both immobile and have the same units that counter them? Oh yes, they have so little in common.

Flame grenades are more expensive the molotovs.

Seems you deliberately forgot about the side tech cost of Soviet grenades. That is the upfront part of the grenade cost. Somebody like you really should know that, so stop posting misleading arguments.

Emplacements have brace and thus can avoid damage.

The myth about brace. Every half decent player knows how to force brace and destroy emplacement after it wears off. The emplacement can't do anything while brace is active and since repair speed got cut down it is just a delay of the inevitable.

Flame grenades are meant to also counter structures and thus they come with bonus damage modifiers.

The reason OKW got incendiary grenades was their problem to get rid of garrisoned MGs in the early stages of the game. There was no problem for OKW to deal with emplacements. In fact they do much better than Ostheer even without incendiary grenades.

Now I am not sure what it the point of this post.
That soviet have trouble dealing with bunkers?
That OKW can deal with emplacement too easily using grenades?
Or that allies got the sort end of the stick once more?

While OP claimed Bofors beeing too strong it quickly turned out that it is a l2p problem and that emplacement are up if anything. Proof is their practically nonexistence in high level play. I just added that in addition to the counters that exist already flame weapons do an absurd amount of damage to UKF emplacements. Destroying a 780HP emplacement with only two nades that you get automatically at your mainline with your main tech is a little bit idiotic.

Maybe the Bofors should work more like a heavy ATG with a rotating gun that requires setup. Defenseless from the sides, but useful to the front.

That would be an interesting idea. Give it higher range in this fire arc so that it can't be countered that easily by a single ATG. Then give it a setup time that is high enough to flank it easily with handheld AT or circle it with LVs/light tanks. In AA mode it shouldn't attack ground units but rotate freely and automatically shoot at incoming planes.

And the fire vulnarability is ridiculous. I always wondered why brit emplacements get so high burning damage even by OKW flame nades while molotovs don't really scratch the german light bunkers (don't speaking about the concrete ones which shouldn't get much damage by fire). Do brits soak their emplacements with fuel while germans don't?

I respect your right to your opinion but your opinion needs some consistency, unfortunately I have to point that you are contradicting your previews post.

According to your own posts, a 76mm with HE/HAVP at current price the 76mm would be too cost efficient and thus OP.

I have point out my point of view on this matter and now it is time to move on.

I do say in both posts that 76mm would be op without a price adjustment. So why I'am contradicting myself? I'm literally saying the same thing in both posts...

So you do agree that Easy ♠'s suggestion to simply to replace AP round with HE round would make the unit OP as I have pointed out it my original post.

Now I can not commend about your suggestion unless you actually specify a price.
I have to point out it that the higher the price the less attractive it would be for 640 HP tank.

Again without specifics I simply can not comment.

There would be very little difference in the importance of switch shell, the unit would simply be stronger in the hand of good players.

The need for a price adjustment does mean that it would be op without. Pretty obvious if you ask me.

I'm not sure about the exact numbers. But I would have faith in the delevoper team if they would implement it. I do think a higher priced but more capable 76mm wouldn't be anyhow more attractive in 1vs1. Obviously it would come out later. But I do think it would be a plus for teamgames where timing and price is of less importance and sheer late game power comes in handy. Having good dps at AI and AT would somehow compensate for low armor and health.