You say you aren't a fan of historical accuracy but complain that falls lose to standard infantry with like 120 muni in weapon upgrades. That doesn't add up. What do you mean by "the power level is too similar" though? Are you referring to the above about falls and obers?
It's not really "derailing", because I'm responding to your comments pertaining to balance, unless your views of historical accuracy shouldn't have any bearings on balance.
dude omg did anyone asked for cost really its bullshit thing to mask unit's nerfs and buffs first of all cost only delays the unit from attaining its maximum power level for examle rifle cost only 280 mp and 120 munition but people you can see in matches always go for it why..?? because it quickly pays for itself the thing that matters is perfomance per popcap which you are getting....i dont want obers and falls to get cheaper make them more expenisve if they want but they should be given the advanatge of their role and the popcap perfomance.
and for mr.smith comment he should test stuff himself vs making any acquisition vet 5 falls do lose to rifles 3 vet double bar at medium range.. and tommies vet 3 double bren 5 man ahiliate them while lose vet 5 ober(thins yo u will rarely see) but obers only 1 have model elf with a sliver of health left...............in both cases they lose to stantadry infy wiht lesser popcaps while being more expenisve,more popcap and are dedicated anti infy