Profile of TAKTCOM

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 275 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward15 Jan 2016, 09:02 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 08:47 AMWaegukin So you saw that I liked the idea of a more diverse Soviets... Yep. It will be good. I do not believe that it happened, but it would be good. Also I do not understand what in Ostrupen&Pz.III bad. Just imagine, every game Germans have two squads for each allies squad, and two or three tanks for each allies tank. German harass everywhere. MASSACRE. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Operation Barbarossa15 Jan 2016, 08:42 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 08:06 AMArray The spy was called Richard Sorge and I have read several sources that describe this intelligence as the most significant on the entire war. I heard about it. Yet, every third Soviet soldier guard border with Japan. Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 07:29 AMrobertmikael That was utterly stupid, because for example more Ukrainians could have fight on the German side against Stalin. Stalin once wrote an article "Dizziness with success". It looks like it's just it was in the Reich. Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 07:41 AMrobertmikael The siege of Leningrad was in a way very effective, because during that time a lot of Russians died and Germans could hold their losses at a minimum... Most of them were civilians. The Nazis were good at it. Still, I do not understand why they could not just turn the town into ruins. In: The Library
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward15 Jan 2016, 08:09 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 07:20 AMWaegukin Lol, fucking read the whole thing next time LOL i read all. And i agree with Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 05:35 AMWaegukin Overall though, Soviets aren't bad and the game is getting close to acceptable balance. The only things Soviets really need are effective penals and something with T4 to make the Soviets less doctrine reliant. A complete overhaul at this point though just isn't really an option. Soviets is OK now, even if T-34-76 and penals is full trash and SU-85, snipers, M3, ML-20, B-4, KV-1 is very questionable. They spammers and they have nothing to do with historical prototypes. But who cares? Your T0, T2, T3 and call in spam works quite well and you don't feel that you troops UP un every game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Revitalizing the Soviets and giving more Risk v. Reward15 Jan 2016, 07:11 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Jan 2016, 05:35 AMWaegukin Overall though, Soviets aren't bad and the game is getting close to acceptable balance. Yeah, they just spammers. Imagine for a moment, thet Ostroopen is main-line german infantry and grens/pz.grens available only in doc, and you main stock tank is T4 cheap Pz.III from 1942. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Operation Barbarossa15 Jan 2016, 06:58 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2016, 22:31 PMArray ...A spy in Tokyo reported that the Japanese had no intention of attacking Russia in the East and so the Soviet command were able to shift a large number of fresh veteran units... In 1941 USSR keep the border with Japan more solders then UK, USA, French, Italy, and Reich taken together have in North Africa. In 1942-1943 USSR keep the border with Japan as much or more solders then UK, USA and Reich taken together have in Normandy 1944. So that "A spy in Tokyo report" sounds pretty funny. Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2016, 05:00 AMjugglerman Like the earlier poster stated- Moscow probably had to be encircled to be conquered.. The Germans just destroyed it as they did with Stalingrad and Warsaw. In: The Library
Thread: OKW Jager13 Jan 2016, 14:33 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2016, 09:26 AMBlackKorp I am talking about OKW In game where the Germans have the best of everything that only could it be? In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: OKW Jager13 Jan 2016, 09:26 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Jan 2016, 09:10 AMBlackKorp I have best solution, just remove this damn faction from the game, problem solved! Remove USF from game? Nice In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: T70 or Quad-mount?11 Jan 2016, 07:10 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2016, 06:36 AMpoop In what situations would I choose the quad mount over a T-70? T-70 against HMG or bunkers. And maybe against Pz.IIL In all other situations quad is preferable. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet Tanks10 Jan 2016, 12:30 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2016, 12:01 PMCROknight hmm soo if this happend then the t34 will die cuz no one will usit How often do you see t34-76 now? Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2016, 12:01 PMCROknight why spend 160 fuel for 2 crap tanks( i guess thy will be call in tanks ) when u can get a t85 Why people take M10 if they can get M36? Why people take some Pumas if they can get PzV? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: General tactics against blobbers players9 Jan 2016, 07:30 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2016, 20:12 PMTroyd Soviet - Maxim - Quad Also mines, demo, katy and ZiS&SU-76 вarrage. Mortars are a nuisance for infantry mass too. In: Strategy Desk