The T34/76 keeps enemy tanks occupied, provides quick pressure on flanks, deals with harrassing units without dying quickly in ambushes like a T70. It's an all-round unit. It also has a turret which makes it much easier to use in urban environments...
Is not it the role of all medium tanks in the game?
How about an Axis armors rush with Panthers, Panzer IVs etc?
What about them? Mines, AT-guns and AT-nade take care of panzers.
As Soviet, you have plenty of other tools to deal with Shreks and Paks.
What does not include use T-34-76.
The T34/76 is not there to protect your katy from schrecks or PAKs. The Katy is there to protect your T34/76 from schreks and PAKs.
Ok. Katy is there to protect my T34/76 from schreks and PAKs. That will do T-34-76?
And against a heavy tank destroyer the T34/76 can flank while the SU85 engages from the front.
Perhaps it would work against alone Ferdinand. Though for alone Ferdinand i make use 2 ZiS with great effect.
Support the tank with a tank-destroyer (either SU76 or SU85) and the Katy and you will find they perform much better than when just getting 4 T34/76.
T34/76 will no protect my SU and the Katy form shreks or PAKs or heavy nazi TD.
I do not like reworking of conscripts. They are sort balanced.
Penal battalions weren't just "cannon fodder". They were often well equipped, much better than your run of the line strelki.
Where did you get this ?
Ppsh would be ok at 2cp, too early at 1cp.
Why GW43 is OK on 1 CP and Ppsh on 1 CP is too early?
The m5 guards calling could maybe be 4cp but lower then that wouldbe too much- the m5 isn't comparable to the 251 call in as it can reinforce and be upgraded allowing it to scale better
Dev have another opinion
Show Spoiler
I do not know, OP Panzerfussiliers or not but they best 6 men squad in game in point of price/quality.
What I do not understand is why all OKW ammo abilities will not increased by 20% cost.
Finish on this. I think I too react to all this.
Adjust is2 accuracy / scatter. Pen is fine. Adjust its base range and vet range to tiger I
It seems that the community is shown unity in this matter
I said it could bounce off with the AP ammunition "at times".Show Spoiler
I don't see words "bounce" or "at times"
The King Tiger could penetrate the IS-2 on all combat ranges .The IS-2 could somewhat fight back, but definitely not by "penetrating" the King Tigers or often even Panthers armor with AP ammunition for that matter .
I specifically mentioned that the HE shell was able to cause spalling damage.
I did so multiple times in this thread and still you think I´m portraying German tanks as invincible
You write strange things. The only known example of the use of HE shells is SU/ISU-152 with their six-inch howitzers. No sence use HE when you have effective AP-rounds. And IS-2 have them.
Again an anecdote. I told you anecdotes
So you're telling me an anecdote. I brought the real facts. I do not know what to say. Perhaps it is good that you have not posted a picture with Mohammed or whatever you have in Europe now in vogue. Thanks for this.
You asked for a source. I guess they are all spreading lies there.
Do you have an anecdote, I have the facts. Everyone lies. Your logic is clear.
I´m under the impression you are an ultra nationalistic Russian fanboy.
I am truth fanboy. I hate the distortion of the facts and information. And this is, what you're doing.
You probably think the IS-2 was the best tank of the war
There is no such thing as the best tank. The Germans could not produce Sherman, the Yankees could not produce the T-34, and soviets could not produce Pz.4. Each did what he could. There was no such as "the best tank." As one yankees said, they were death traps. And Soviet veterans were of the same opinion. No matter IS, T-34 and T-70. All of them burned the same way.
Stop blaming others of not knowing shit while obviously being deluded by Soviet propaganda.
I can only hope that one day you stop littering the propaganda of the Cold War, which was to ensure that the Communists fear is not necessary, they are stupid, weak and primitive. And the fact that they defeated the best army of the world is by accidentally came and it was all fault general Moroz. But really ... I do not care. Your brainwashed exclusively your problem.
1) Vet 1 IS-2 absolutly useless for heavy tank.
2) Tiger have they range buff. IS-2 his direct opponent of count this game, got nothing. Why?
If you quote me, quote the entire text. Anything else is equal to a lie. Show Spoiler
Lie that IS-2 AP ammunition not "penetrating" the King Tigers or Panthers.
Report polygon number 314 of November 21, the fire was already shot and on the burning hull of the tank "Panther", and said that the 122-mm thick-headed projectile from a distance of 1200 m punched frontal armor thickness of 85 mm.
No problem with Tiger I, his forehead free struggled armor-piercing projectile with 1200-1800 m, depending on the type used projectile.
About HE shells. There was only one option when IS-2 shooting HE shell on German tanks: in the barrel was already a HE shell.
How invincible King Tigers showed battles on Sandomir beachhead. How many they have? About thirty tanks?
And how many of them there for three days of fighting? Oops, not at all.
What an absolutely fun, so that's what the Germans themselves lost all King Tigers but could not even destroy a one soviet tank.
Edit: Someone else posted this already on this forum some time ago. There you have it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oza2jqTyn4o#t=26m40s
Nice anime. One of the coolest stories that have occurred is not clear where it is not clear to anyone, but it was cool, so who cares.
You don´t even make sense. I specifically mentioned that the HE shells could damage the armor of Tigers etc.
That is not you write?
The IS-2 could somewhat fight back, but definitely not by "penetrating" the King Tigers or often even Panthers armor with AP ammunition for that matter.
Well, if it was your cat or whoever else, I should probably apologize.