The Tiger SU-85 analogy is simply misleading. SU-84 is cheaper than Panther and with Range 60.
How is that misleading? It's the only vehicle in soviet arsenal capable of at least trying to fight a Tiger.
SU-85s require way more micro to defeat a Tiger, and even then you will need support. Panther on the other hand can tank a lot of damage, but due to it's versitility and mobility it just shouldn't own a tank that costs 50 fuel more, requires 12 CP and has a number limit!
Yes you can make more than one Panther but above is not really advisable.
Oh maybe it's not advisable when you oppose some crap T-34s and Shermans, but when IS-2 appeears - a tank that is only present in 2 commanders, you should adapt to the situation and make a second one? How can that not be obvious to you? Why do you think that your one universal strategy should always defeat the enemy despite their joice to waste a lot of resources on a damn super heavy?
Come on man, I know you have a long history of complaining about allies being OP, but the game is about adapting to situation, not whining that "IS-2 combined with SU-85 kills my tanks" because you must fight them from the front and you can't think of a better strategy than overpowering your opponent.
Oh and actually I've just tested that. Face to face 2 panthers will still kill the IS-2 before the first one of them is dead, and it will leave a 1v1 situation when SU-85 fights a full HP panther.
lol