A minute later... i'm still silently laughing about your signature
Hi there!
Profile of kamk
Avatar Area
1
Posts: 764
General Information
Residence: Antarctica
Nationality: Antarctica
Residence: Antarctica
Nationality: Antarctica
Signature
Post History of kamk
Thread: Hello, my (nick)name is Scifiroel, I'm new here21 May 2015, 10:20 AM
In: New Members |
Thread: Allies (Mainly USF) TD spam.18 May 2015, 12:20 PM
2xPAK40s with royal usage of Target Weak Point easily takes care of Jacksons and SU85s. Or any other allied medium tank for that matter; just stun-lock and kill. Yep. Pak40 wall > Allied TDs Have some Grens nearby to faust, and you can shut them down completely. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates16 May 2015, 22:39 PM
I hate going OT, but... i wish the forums would be more heavily moderated in some sub-forums. It's a shame that plenty of decent topics go to shit due some one line flame war replies. just my 2 sad cents... :/ In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates16 May 2015, 22:19 PM
Is this guy for real? You're telling me in less than one and a half month this guy watched a thousand games? That's what, 25 games per day, every day? Well, he was only interested in the outcome. So you tab in, 8x speed, tab out, tab in later. It's not that much. I basically played half the amount of games in 4v4 in a similar way (lot's of tabbing out). In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates16 May 2015, 19:37 PM
Absolutely, but as i said multiple times: there's actual balance, and there's perceived balance. OPs statistics show the latter (i still doubt the gap is that huge). Keep in mind: there's no point in balancing for the 1%, or in this case the <0.5%. Also another thing we don't know: how many players are there per faction? SOV & OST probably a lot, followed, maybe even matched, by OKW, but USF? As an example: i've never encountered a 5 digit rank for a USF player - so this could also mean a rank #200 USF player might be as good as some #500 OST player, or even way worse. Well, hope you got my point. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates16 May 2015, 13:47 PM
Not necessarily, they're just different. And why do you mention some random OKW units now is beyond my comprehension. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates16 May 2015, 12:44 PM
Hi! Well, OPs data includes random ranks, and also ATs, which are very common in 2v2s, from ALL skill ranges. Would be interesting to see how the win ratios change if you do include arranged teams. And especially how great the disparity is between the top 0.5% that you currently gather and the majority of players, the other 99.5%. I think most of us can agree that higher ranked players have an easier time adjusting to certain balance changes, but in the end the game has to be playable for the majority, not some top 1%, and this is where OPs data is quite fascinating - even though i doubt such a huge difference in win ratios. just my 2 cents In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 19:45 PM
How did he watched 1000 games, made sure there are no AT teams so his "RT only" is valid, ... RANDOM 2v2s, as in he randomly picked them. Including ATs and actual random lineups. Imbalances due MM shouldn't cause any issues with such a sample size, IF the data is proper (which is still doubt). In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: 2vs2 Winrates15 May 2015, 18:21 PM
I watched until the game ended and I included games that surrendered at any point. This is a random sample of 1000 2v2 games recording the winners. Suuuuuuuuuuuuure. But what if this would be actually true... In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: [sarcasm]tags[/sarcasm]15 May 2015, 07:48 AM
Sarcasm? Y U NO ? In: Site Feedback |
332309331158330823330820330729330641330627330424330388330267
Latest replays uploaded by kamk
-
neat comeback AchtAchter / kamk vs. Legendary / Nosliwby: kamk map: Crossing in the Woods1-1,269
-
VS?rf2$? ?