This error?
You can still buy from the market without any issues, but no ingame store works anymore?
There's a nice guide in the Steam DB:
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=4453-WGHZ-7934
If none of the described things are an issue for you, ever were, nor fix it - then you should contact Steam support. Make sure you use the categories as described at the bottom of the page, then they'll usually answer and fix it in less than 24 hours.
Profile of kamk
Avatar Area
1
Posts: 764
General Information
Residence: Antarctica
Nationality: Antarctica
Residence: Antarctica
Nationality: Antarctica
Signature
Post History of kamk
Thread: COH 2 : Can't buy anything from In-Game store2 Jul 2015, 11:04 AM
|
Thread: Steam Advertisment Problems1 Jul 2015, 14:38 PM
Steam support won't help you with tech issues. Your PC is infected by malware. I assume you tried the usual candidates? Like... https://www.malwarebytes.org/, http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security-essentials-download https://www.avast.com/index If that doesn't help, you can always go deeper and do some research on the malware itself. |
Thread: Steam Advertisment Problems1 Jul 2015, 13:31 PM
Could you make a screenshot please? |
Thread: Why No Maxim Buff?1 Jul 2015, 11:07 AM
... You have to pack up and re-direct a lot more often with the maxim than you do with an HMG42. 1 is easier to flank but can set up faster. 1 is harder to flank but sets up slower. Keep in mind that the fast setup time also allows you to a-move the Maxim, and use it in a more agressive manner. At the same time flanking an HMG42 is more deadly, same goes for nading it, a Maxim will still mostly get out... except it's crew decides to bunch up again So yeah, i kinda have to agree with VonIvan here. If the crew wouldn't bunch up all the time, it could certainly make more use of it's better durability. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: A few words from our community manager30 Jun 2015, 20:18 PM
Your stay was short but worthwhile. I hope you'll find more happiness at your next job. Thanks for trying to be more open with us, and all the fun streams. In: Lobby |
Thread: CoH 2 Loading Issue29 Jun 2015, 19:20 PM
Well, was worth a try, but besides the usual stuff i can't recommend you anything specific. Hope someone else has an idea. Mission saves / checkpoints are stored online. If you got personal savegames, you may want to backup this: C:\Users\user\Documents\my games\company of heroes 2\Savegames |
Thread: Black Mesa- HL remake29 Jun 2015, 13:51 PM
In my opinion that's the fun part about Half-Life. The whole story evolves around you, in first person. No artificial intro, no tutorial, no cut scenes, no constant babbling by the character you play, just you and the enviroment. In: Other Games |
Thread: CoH 2 Loading Issue29 Jun 2015, 10:45 AM
https://support.steampowered.com/kb_article.php?ref=2037-QEUH-3335&l=english Nvm. Can you maybe try the following start paremeters and see if it works: -nomovies -window -lockmouse |
Thread: Why No Maxim Buff?27 Jun 2015, 19:11 PM
Stop this nonsense. Both kubel and hmg42 suppress in first burst. Where maxim advantage in suppression? It have both disadvantages in suppressing single squad, AoE suppression, and arc of fire. In 1v1 maxim vs hmg42 duel it all comes down to who start firing first and have better cover. Maxim also supresses with first burst. And both Maxim and HMG42 supress with two bursts vs. yellow cover. Green cover is a bit weird for every MG atm, mainly due stray entities that aren't really covered. Maxims advantage isn't in crowd control. It has a way faster setup time with a more durable 6 man crew, so it can be used more easily as a surgical supression platform in an offensive, while being less prone to being flanked by faster de-setup and re-positioning. Keep in mind: the grass isn't always greener on the other side. In: COH2 Gameplay |
Thread: building a non gaming computer.27 Jun 2015, 09:57 AM
... Well, let me elaborate with a tiny wall of text: Well, as i told you: it isn't exactly "cheaper", it's just a less bloated mainboard. Btw.: if you like durable mobos in the 75-200 range, you should check out Gigabyte. ASRock certainly isn't as bad it's reputation anymore. CPU wise i never argued for or against a dual CPU build. 5 heavy duty users will certainly make sure a dual E5 isn't bored, but you still haven't provided an actual workload scenario, and therefore it's rather tough to recommend anything. Keep in mind your first build had a 630$ mobo + CPU combo, a dual E5 build would be around 900 - with certainly way better bandwith, cache, and performance overall - IF that's even required though, otherwise it doesn't make any sense of course. But let's go for a single CPU setup. It depends now on the actual workload, again, and of course if you OC or not. If you won't OC, then the 4790k is a complete waste of money. You also have to add the cooling tax - no OC comes for free. Small price / performance comparison with an alternative: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=2275&cmp[]=2341&cmp[]=2226 Don't get fooled by the "server" designation, the E3 Xeons are basically rebranded i7 with optional (!) ECC support. They do not require any "specific setup", and any decent mainboard manufacturer has them in their list of supported CPUs. Or just go for the non-k i7. Nothing against the Seasonic models. They're good PSUs in general, certainly no firecrackers, and 80+ is decent. But decent isn't good. Efficiency is more important than you might think, besides the implied assumption of higher quality components, a not so efficient PSU will easily turn 30-50W into nothing but heat. For grandpa John Doe who uses his PC one hour a week it won't make a difference, but if you use it more regularly, your few bucks worth of "saving" will vanish in a couple of months. Personally i would recommend some Enermax Platimax in that price range, sadly though they're twice as expensive in the US. So, maybe take a look at the Enermax Revolution xt - pretty much same price as your Seasonic, but Gold standard. And there's of course alternatives, like the Enermax DigiFanless, Seasonic Platinum series, BeQuiet Straight / Dark Power, and so on... You're not "losing" onboard graphics. Any cheap 50$ mobo has a passthrough for integrated CPU graphics. Modern Intel HD are also capable of 2x 1080P. But let's assume you want a dedicated GPU, why don't you just go for some cheaper GT 720/30, which comes at half the price, has at least twice the video memory, way better performance, and comes passive cooled. The Quadro NVS doesn't make any sense if you're not going for professional graphics work, or plain bragging rights. SSDs are way more relieable than HDDs, in every regard. M2 cards can be faster due the interface, doesn't mean they always are, or it's necessarily noticeable outside of benchmarks. Matter of slot availability and usage. If you want to go for benchmark bragging rights, or actually need that bandwith, then have a look at PCIe flash memory. One can also go nuts with software / hardware ramdisks. If you got a lot of random reads / writes, and don't need several TB of space, then SSDs are the way to go. The mentioned CPU coolers are still on the market, and should be decided on if you OC or not. Example: the Noctua D15 can easily keep up with more pricy water cooling solutions, easily surpasses them in a noise to cooling ratio, but would be complete overkill if you never OC heavily. Sidenote: keep in mind that coolers have different memory height clearance. And as i told you from the start: it all depends on the usage. (and a small edit: i'm not sure why you think about any OC stuff in the first place) |
348793348403348374348340348000347434347182347092346463346256
Latest replays uploaded by kamk
-
neat comeback AchtAchter / kamk vs. Legendary / Nosliwby: kamk map: Crossing in the Woods1-1,258
-
VS?rf2$? ?