Profile of BeefSurge

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1891

General Information


Thread: 2020 CoH 3 is becoming more real by every day15 Jun 2017, 00:12 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2017, 22:33 PMferwiner Sounds a lot like coh1 with all the game modes and direct control. The gameplay should still be similar to coh2 though. If factions are designed to be fun and flavorful (like USF for instance) coh2 gameplay reigns supreme over coh1 imo because the strategy is still there, just less with teching and resource control and more with upgrades, muni expenditure, and army comp. Also by direct control I meant in 1st person with unit production/etc being handled via hot key. In: Lobby
Thread: Playing as USF is unfun anymore15 Jun 2017, 00:08 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2017, 22:36 PMLoopDloop Might try this actually. M20 doesn't drain away all your muni though? Because you need that for at in the case of luchs/222 or a p4 that comes faster than your Jackson (m20 mines are great, but can't be the only defense against a luchs or else you're screwed). you can use rifle smoke to play around vehicles and zooks to deter, besides mines and at nades. stug 3s would definitely be a source of problems but I'm not sure how they've been nerfed if at all. M10s plus Scott's with .50 cal play sounds effective too. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Eastern Front Armies Revamp 14 Jun 2017, 22:28 PM give pzgrens smoke instead of bundle nade + limited repair ability id also swap stug 4 and doctrinal stug 3 then lock behind side tech so ost gets a non doctrinal option for cheap armor and midgame aggression while MA gets a beefy TD to support its tiger. played a comp stomp with the mod and ost doesnt seem any more flexible, its still form a wall and hold out kind of gameplay. just throwing out ideas. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 2020 CoH 3 is becoming more real by every day14 Jun 2017, 22:23 PM coh2 kind of gameplay is the way to go just with more options and flavor for factions. coh3 with 1943 theme and launching with UK vs Germany with US and USSR expansions would be fun. customizable commanders would be fun. buildable air units would be fun, and being able to directly control certain units outside of competitive matches would draw people in. (make it its own gamemode.) In: Lobby
Thread: Playing as USF is unfun anymore14 Jun 2017, 22:19 PM back from a 3 month hiatus and on a +9 game streak as USF and ranked 110 currently. 3 rifle>LT>MG/M20>racks and grenades>scott is really good. the scott buffs make it retardedly good at killing infantry and the delayed 222 means i have the flank advantage for an extra minute or two. rifle smoke/at nade/zooks/and M20 mines are enough to stall light vehicles although i havent played against mechanized assault stugs yet. been back teching captain lategame for the enhanced production and stuarts to stun lock tanks for jackson. pack howie is still redundant as fuck unfortunately. only real issue i have with the faction is shermans just arent worth it with the scott buffs. scotts plus jacksons are cheaper and more efficient than shermans plus jacksons. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: different firing ranges of inf units?4 Mar 2017, 22:16 PM Stg44 range is lower than rifle In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Non-Rifle DPS army comp4 Mar 2017, 21:43 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2017, 21:31 PM__deleted__ Then try USF/OST, my favorites For sure. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Steel Division: Normandy 44 (RTS ww2 published by Paradox)4 Mar 2017, 21:24 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2017, 16:57 PM5trategos I have very low expectations for this game and Eugen's track record on strategy games is weak. Wargame is nice if you have a fetish for miniature models but you'd be sorely disappointed at its lack of tactical depth. Thousands of units don't mean shit if they all fall in a handful of indistinguishable roles. RUSE is barely worth mentioning and I'd be genuinely ashamed to have Act of Aggression on my resume. We'll see how Steel Division turns out, but judging by the way they deride other games as being "contrived rock-paper-scissors" suggests that they don't really understand strategy games to begin with and that they're mostly in the business of producing pretty dioramas. Yeah you just suck at Wargame. Every unit subclass (line infantry, shock troops, medium armor, heavy, cavalry tank, IR AA, etc) is tailored to a specific job and units within the subclass still are different, meaning you have ultimate control of what you want to accomplish tactically. T72B is great against troops and maintains RoF at close range, but the K1 can take more damage and has superior accuracy and stabilizers. Autocannon IFV provide fire support but inflate the cost of troop deployment, and so on. Wargame is a tactical tabletop game you command in real time, with a plethora of units. If your expecting total war or something gtfo. In: Other Games
Thread: Non-Rifle DPS army comp4 Mar 2017, 20:54 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2017, 19:03 PM__deleted__ Lol, NO. OKW right now is all about great early game with kubel, allowing agression into mid game luchs and puma and then you can do what you want. They are no longer infntry spam. If you just brainlessly spam infantry you gonna die They spam infantry and rush vehicles my bad. I use the term spam with them, and not USF or Sov penal/guard armies, because OKW infantry excluding Obers is retardedly cost efficient and don't really have synergies with each other or special utility, and the ability to screen infantry forces with predator camo puppchens encourages A-move kind of play imho. The faction is honestly kind of UP but they are just too linear and specialized in T0/tech rush for me. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: Should all factions converge to same late-game strength?4 Mar 2017, 17:52 PM In different ways. For instance Sov has better lategame than Ost but this is based on doctrine, and Ost can compensate with veterancy abilities. Really the only armies with out of wack late games are USF and OKW, with the former being weak and the later being strong. In: COH2 Gameplay