Profile of Bananenheld

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198000494642


Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?16 Oct 2015, 10:27 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 10:22 AMOmega_Warrior I suppose I overlooked that, but still that's only 160 for healing wherever you need it. Soviet healing is 250 for only in the base. Not to mention molotovs and AT grenades which are 150 each, of which whermacht gets for free. The soviet player will still be paying much more to accomplish what ostheer can do for less. And again forgot something.60mun is alot of resource(would weight it with 200mp, i mean u got a 220+manpower per minute income and mosly only 30 muni per Minute ) to spend. Especially as Ost when u need lmg on every gern and maybe a mine. And yea grens dont need tech t2 to use Riffe Nades or Faust. Its a linear Tech i get it but to say it's free is just Not correct. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?16 Oct 2015, 10:15 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 09:44 AMOmega_Warrior Then don't fucking do that then! You don't see USF players building 3-4 stuarts or UKF building 3-4 AECs. I don't understand why so many soviet players think it's okay and that they should be able to pull out a medium in a decent amount of time after spamming light vehicles. This Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 09:38 AMOmega_Warrior BTW Manpower teching costs are thus: USSR: 640 Wher: 620 UKF: 460 USF: 440 OKW: 400 Now these can be a bit misleading. USF usually will spend 150-250 on the upgrades or ambulance they need to not bleed out which can even their costs a bit to 600 levels. UKF is similar in this aspect as well and will end up spending comparable manpower too with just 1 or 2 side teching and infantry upgrades. Meanwhile whermacht won't have to spend anything on upgrades and will never spend more then 620 on teching. And in fact can actually lower the needed manpower cost by 80 - 200 if skipping tech. And OKW need never spend more then the base 400 manpower cost to reach T4 as they have no upgrades as well. The thing is 640 is the best case scenario for soviets. It only gets higher from there with upgrades and healing. They are the only faction that will routinely be spending 700+ manpower on teching. With that kind of cost it's no wonder they try to steer away from teching all the way. Especially when the T-34 needs numbers and momentum to stay relevant. TLDR: Soviet manpower teching costs are too high and need to go down Ost doesnt Need to spend 160mp 60 muni for heal too? From my subjective Experience Ost pays the most manpower and fuel wise for tech. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brit Mid to Late Game Healing16 Oct 2015, 10:05 AM I dont have ukf but all other factions u actually keep ur sniper close to your infantry o.O In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Does the T-34/76 need love?16 Oct 2015, 00:27 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 22:03 PMaaa +1. Can be cp requrment for T3 t3476 to prevent rush. After watching several top games I say that ostheer smoke is uncounterable 90% of the time. Its an abuse. I really like ram to be powerful. Just like smoke make RAM a vet 1 ability. Good snare for risking a vet1+ unit Seems Balancable (lower mp cost so they reach vet1 a bit faster for example ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuka Dive Bomb AoE... Has it been buffed indirectly?16 Oct 2015, 00:23 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 23:55 PMDullahan It's a gamble. It only works if you can force a mass retreat with an inferior army. If your opponent spends the same amount of munitions on his own abilities and weapons you're especially going to be behind. (Most players float like crazy though.) He'll have brens, bars or ppsh. He'll have medium tanks, artillery and likely more map control. I could see it being more of a problem in scrub vs scrub (4v4) but in a real game mode I just don't think it's a big deal because you're trading army value for the opportunity to nuke him in the late game if he retreats everything together. Dont forget that you Need good Timing and knowledge of how long the retreat path on each map is In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Info about game updates15 Oct 2015, 23:01 PM I dont think thats fair to say without mentioning the greatly improved commuication with the community from lelic ! In: Lobby
Thread: grenadier/panzergrenadier lack of survivability 15 Oct 2015, 20:34 PM What about letting grens as fragile as they are and add a Med bunker In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Next patch sneak peak by Relic15 Oct 2015, 16:08 PM Coh2 cant beat coh 1 just because coh1 had years of fixing and balancing.coh2 will be There too, just needs some time to find the Sweet Spot In: Lobby
Thread: LeIG AND Packhowitzer are useless without auto facing15 Oct 2015, 15:49 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 14:49 PMQbix Whatever floats your boat then. Was just pointing out that I think many people are using them for free firing. Until next patch that is. So it's a change many will feel and some of them will even come to the forum and whine about it. Didnt want to Sound rude,sorry. I just thought it's normal to Micro his units (includng mortars and Light artillery) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: grenadier/panzergrenadier lack of survivability 15 Oct 2015, 14:37 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Oct 2015, 14:31 PMEsxile It is already compensate by better later game tanks. So True especially factions didnt get homoginizated at all. In: COH2 Balance