Profile of malecite

Speed doesn't matter when you have 80 range, neither does health with that armor. Stun on a 320 dmg 80 range beast is not super veterancy?

But hey atleast they have more range. And armor. And AT. And face worse AT.

But you just said Immortal tanks don't need to cost more, they need to simply stop being immortal hyper cost efficient beings.

To date, and I've been keeping count. I build JT every game as OKW and have yet to lose even 1 JT since the british release. When using it I feel bad for my enemies, as it honestly requires pure retardation to ever lose a JT. Build 1 then deny half of the map for enemy armor. Works without fail

Do you see how stupid this argument is?

I've yet to see a jt or elefant die to anything else without a fatal user error but m10 spam.

Your arguments just contradicts what you previously said about "immortal tanks", and is purely anecdotal

I fail to see how 1 unit shutting down any armor play on certain maps, and heavily limiting on others is somehow more ''healthy'' than a churchill that has to drive up to be effective. Mind you I never said the current churchill is fine, but when it comes to gameplay is way less obnoxious than having your only decent AT tanks be in need of repair after 1 shot in my opinion

If you are playing OKW vs British lately and have been using Jadgs I have a really hard time believing you have "never lost one".

The British vanguard Typhoon call in or the British Artillery cover call in are instant death sentences for Jagdtigers. In the case of the typhoons the planes hit instantly and will begin chain stunning it preventing it from backing up and usually taking its health down to half, in the case of the artillery cover the 1000 pen 100% accurate artillery will constantly fall on it, blow up its engine, and basically guarantee its death. You can also watch one of the replays floating around of the Air Supremacy insta killing one before it can back away.

I have actually stopped building jadgtigers and elephants now because in larger team matches a single British call in will basically kill the unit instantly. Better, but more riskier, to go with mass Stugs although Churchills are surprisingly nimble and can actually circle strafe the fucking things. If you can keep them at range stugs work very well, but the new strategy appears to be comets or a cromwell for the smoke shot to blind your stugs/paks, then drive up with the churchills grenade the paks and obliterate the stugs. Again the issue is the MASSIVE healthpool so if you can keep them at range the stugs can dps them pretty fast, but if they can close then the Stugs will die with virtually no meaningful damage to the churchills.

I would be all in favor of keeping it at its current level of effectiveness but limiting it to 1 along with the KT. But as of right now teamplay is such a mess that I am on permanent vacation from this shitty game until Relic patches it.

axis heavy need buff
getting a kt and jagtiger in a game is a acheivment in its own
and they should be quite formedable once you get them but nope
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seb_tA8ezNA

All that video showed is how fucking broken air supremacy is. The axis heavies were performing just fine, in fact the jadgtiger had what? 6 vehicle kills before it died to that bombing run which wiped all their paks, brought the tiger down to one hit, and nearly killed the jadgtiger.

So no I think the heavies are fine, the problem is the hilariously unbalanced British call ins.

I believe axis players are just not used to dealing with very durable tanks, and they'll get used to it in time, just like they got used to the Quad (which Relic handled perfectly). It's probably too early to call for massive nerfs, but personally I think the fuel cost should be raised slightly, considering how the Churchill has bad AT and a cruel manpower cost.

There is a difference between "durable tanks" and the churchill. The panther is a "durable tank" with 800HP, the tiger is a durable tank with 1080 Hp.

The churchill is ridiculous with 1600Hp because it is basically unkillable and a crutch for shitty players with poor micro to be rewarded with vet anyways. Again one is fine, its when you start to see a bunch of them that you simply cannot do enough damage to them before everything you have is toast.

There is no "learning how to deal" with a tank that can take 10 hits from your tank destroyers and AT guns all the while grenading your AT gun and simply outlasting/focusing down your TD's.

After playing probably 8 matches with the British yesterday I have to say I have revised my opinion about the Firefly. I tried using it without the Tulips and well... its pretty lackluster.

-The turret rotation is indeed way too slow when combined with the sluggish nature of the tank.
-The ROF is fine when you have it sitting nicely behind another tank, but on its own it fails to actually scare anything away. Instead people just drive at the tank and its basically helpless.
-Way too expensive for what it does, better off just investing in another Churchhill.

So I would agree about ditching the tulips, making them cheaper, or just buffing the tank and making the Tulips a doctrinal thing.

Nothing should be fucking limited except perhaps elite super units like the Tiger Ace.

It's such a shitty way to balance things.

Well the only issue with the churchill is massed churchhills at the moment which can destroy things designed to hardcounter them.

So honestly limiting them to one would be one way of doing it without nerfing the unit, plus you always have the croco or AVRE call in so you could still get 2.

I am all for limiting the KT to 1 to get its stupid pop cap down from 25 as you never even see multiple KT's.