Profile of ElSlayer

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198020912674


Thread: M5 Quadrush24 Jul 2015, 11:59 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2015, 11:51 AMIron Emperor @Elslayer I know that you do something wrong, but at some points your units get pushed back and your pak isn't back in the front lines quick enough. But then it is not a problem with M5 exclusively. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Abilities that need tweaking24 Jul 2015, 11:14 AM Tripwire flares, anyone? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M5 Quadrush24 Jul 2015, 10:56 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2015, 10:40 AMIron Emperor Luckely you've seen the problems now for yourself. So what we told wasn't utterly bullcrap. Point is that the early pak is just not flexible enough to take out a M5 since it can just flank you and take out your pak in only 2 seconds. Therefor a Puma does a way better job since it's armour is more resilliant against M5 Quad power Puma comes out a little bit late (if M5 was rushed) and is a reliable doctinal solution only if Soviet player chose doctrine without PTRS (non-Guard, not Tank Hunter). Early Pak isn't flexible enough against M5 at same level as Maxim isn't flexible enough to deal with Kubel. Both can't finish it unless you've damaged its engine, but both can push that thing off. Actually Pak have more chances to kill M5 than Maxim against Kubel. IMO if you let M5 to #justflank your Pak, you did something wrong, just like with any other light vehicle, be it T-70, double flamer M5 or just M3A1 flamecar. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M5 Quadrush24 Jul 2015, 08:35 AM I have played a few 4v4 games as Soviet and I've changed my mind. That thing is so fucking good. Especially with snipers, which help to take out PSchrekked PGrens and Paks. Lowering damage won't help much, because 360 noscope long range AoE suppression will counter any infantry play anyway. I think that locking upgrade behind T4 is the only option. Though I fear that it will repeat fate of Wehrmach Flamer Halftrack, despite it have no need to get into grenade range to shoot. Personally, I'd better plant 4 mines in late game. EDIT: I have to add that I never faced EARLY Pak. Opponents always tried to rush Puma/Panther or Ostwind/Pz.IV. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to deal with Double OKW in 2v2.24 Jul 2015, 07:21 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2015, 06:39 AM__deleted__ I have, same 2 guyst constantly. Work togheter flawlessly. Ml 20 is kind of harsh because some maps let the stuka hit it without any effort, such as crossing in the woods. Thank you for your tips It won't destroy it right away, only decrew and heavily damage it at best. Repair and recrew. ML-20 is OK even without vet. Also it is good that Wurfrahmen didn't barraged your AT-guns instead. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: T-34/85 & Sherman M4E8 after patch changes23 Jul 2015, 12:46 PM Yeah, M4C suffered in comparsion to T-34-85. It didn't deserved that. Previously Lend-Lease was the only realistic option to have at one time: - Medium tank - TD - Rocket artillery - Forward reinforcement - AA Now you can get all the same, but a better medium tank EARLIER if you pick T-34-85 commander. There is no point in M5+AssGuards call-in anymore. DSHka is crap compared to Maxim and could be somewhat usefull only if you go T1, but that manpower better be saved to rush M5. The only unique and usefull part of commander left is fuel drop. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Quentin defeated by DevM23 Jul 2015, 11:13 AM rush cares too much about Quentin's e-peen... In: Replays
Thread: Make Falls and Obers 5 man squads23 Jul 2015, 10:44 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2015, 10:12 AMJohnnyB No, just no. Bad idea. Let's not screw up balance. Squads suffer wipes all the time in this game, is just that the elite squads are more expensive. Chosing to play with an elite squads it's a risk that you know and accept from verry beginning. The risk increases exponentialy for every extra elite squad you build so you definetly should have a diverse army and not rely mainly on elite infantry. That high reward - high risk shit, ya know? Shocks are not unbeatable and now falls and obers neither. Squad wiping is in the "shit happens" category and we cannot change that. This. It's not like they were totally clumped in your video, but that shot went down right in the middle of your squad. RNG. Shit happens. Before tweaking balance they should fix squad spacing for all units. Then we'll see. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the OKW P4--a specialist generalist23 Jul 2015, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2015, 10:21 AMKatitof Have you considered... I don't know.... NOT using tanks to counter tank destroyers and instead using... I don't know.... puppchens and shrecks? And good luck believing 230 armor tank should cost the same as 180 armor tank with all other stats being same. I can't even tell anymore if you're so naive or so biased to even suggest that laughable change. Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2015, 10:27 AM__deleted__ If we take your logic into consideration, basing cost upon armor value, the Is2 should be more expensive than the KingTiger 0/10 L2Read In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF Underpowered. I HATE axis. 23 Jul 2015, 08:06 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jul 2015, 07:47 AMsteel You may request a change to the thread title if you wish so. Keep it. It is very funny to watch when people reply not reading OP In: COH2 Gameplay