Profile of ElSlayer

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198020912674


Thread: Ostheer infantry scaling4 Mar 2017, 22:49 PM PGrens are quite good if you ask me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why do you like Coh2? 2 Mar 2017, 18:14 PM pls delete In: Lobby
Thread: Why do you like Coh2? 2 Mar 2017, 18:13 PM 1) Cover system 2) Team weapons with limited arc of fire 3) Suppression mechanic 4) Squad-based unit command 5) Low amount of units to control 6) Resources are scattered around map, so you have actually leave base 7) WWII setting (I thought to add "that includes Eastern Front" at first, but then remembered Soviet campaign) 8) Generally good design of vanilla factions with great combined arms approach in mind In: Lobby
Thread: What if the OKW and Wehrmacht tech systems were switched?2 Mar 2017, 18:07 PM How about just switch their names instead? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Arguments against possible upcoming OKW/UKF nerfs2 Mar 2017, 18:03 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2017, 04:15 AMStorm Elite ...who in blue blazes is complaining about Volksgrenadier veterancy?! WHO?! Volksgrenadiers DO NOT DO DAMAGE. They are effectively an Ostheer Pioneer squad with more health. No damage at max range. No damage at mid range. No damage at close range. Volksgrenadiers are not a unit in the game Company of Heroes 2. They're a terrain decoration. [...] Cons disagree with you. Dirt cheap (60 muni) non-doc upgrade with no unlock cost that improves mid and close range damage, while not hampering it on long range fixes that easily. As well as no-unlock-cost faust, flame nade and doctrinal dirt cheap infil nade which are left in such state from times when OKW had muni penalty and resource conversion. OKW have its problems, but IMO damage (and generally scaling) of volks squad is not one of them. In: Lobby
Thread: Arguments against possible upcoming OKW/UKF nerfs1 Mar 2017, 17:42 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Mar 2017, 13:35 PMluvnest [...] My reasonable suggestion is to remove OKW, USF and UKF alltogether, but I can't find that in the poll for some reason. In: Lobby
Thread: Remove "Main Gun destroyed" 1 Mar 2017, 12:45 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2017, 12:53 PMaaa [...] As I remember even for IS2 main gun destroed means nothing and easily avoidable while for t3476 its a death sentence. Most axis tanks are is2 like or bigger so they dont suffer from it. I think removing "gun destroyed" perfectly make sense and was said by several sane 1v1 players. Not this just an RNG but it is a serious balance issue, that gives solid unintended advantage for axis. Actually, T-34 is the only tank that can do at least something with its main gun destroyed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sovs vs leigs.21 Feb 2017, 01:24 AM Well, this is an easy one: 1) Remove autofire from all indirect. 2) Rework barrage so it would fire like 6 shells at fire rate 1 shell per second. The Result: 1) You have to actually control the unit. 2) You have to plan where and when to use it. 3) Indirect fire team weapons will actually counter static weapons (forcing them to move or killing several crew members). Probably one leig/mortar would be enough to consistently deal with couple of MGs (if there are more MGs you should probably invest more into indirect). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is the Pershing so cheap?19 Feb 2017, 18:49 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2017, 18:28 PMferwiner The main problem of ballance forums is in the people who never play the faction in question but argue about it. In my experience, in 99% of cases, if someone says that the faction he doesn't play is OP, its a hardcore l2p issue. I'd add that in many cases the issue is in the map balance, not the faction balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why is the Pershing so cheap?19 Feb 2017, 18:16 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2017, 17:56 PMDonnieChan Is there any Unit there isn't an "OP"- thread about in the balance forum? M-42 In: COH2 Balance