Profile of ElSlayer

Nah, but GrW42 isnt over engineered expensive enough ._.

And was produced in numbers more than 2.

Basically, it's this.

If we tune Jackson to miss vs target-size 2 P4's, it's going to also miss vs target size 26 KTs. And, oh boy, it's also going to miss a lot vs target-size 13 Blitzking KTs.

You don't need target tables to settle this. You just need target sizes that make sense.

Then the problem is in bullshit abilities and the fact that the difference between light tanks and super heavies is negligible.

How stupid are players to build tanks when only infantry and artillery are enough...

Actually his point is quite valid, at least from my experience. I've had quite many games where I managed to wipe several enemy squads with Katyushas and then have double ZiS and Guards to fend off whatever vehicles they had.

I had some games where whole late game I've tried to find a moment when I can take this thing down. When I finally commit to it and get the job done... opponent just calls in another one.

I think it would be better if heavy armor call-ins that are restricted to single unit on the field would go on cooldown after that unit is lost instead of after it was called in.

Allow FRP points to work only in sectors adjacent to base sector or around a radius from base sector.

The benefit will be there but it will less significant.

In addition allow all faction to place a retreat banner with in their base sector.

Hey, I'd love to have some benefit too when I tech to T4 with Soviets.

Care to elaborate on that point? What you've said contradicts itself when stated like that.

Ok, I'll exaggerate it more so you could understand what I mean:
don't play the game because you can lose it.

Investing in armor when the enemy has plenty of AT options is generally a risky move, yes. Just like investing in a FRP when the enemy has plenty of indirect and suppression options. Generally when something "has counterplay" and it is out in the field in abundance then yes, it is quite risky to go with the option you know is going to be countered.

If you can't push his infantry away and get to his indirect fire units while having FRP then you're doing it wrong.

Each mortar is 1 less penal or guard or whatever faction you're facing. You should be able force them off with FRP in 2 attacks max. Then you can cap everything around and repair your FRP safely.

And by indirect I mean mortars because the REAL counters to FRPs like rocket artillery come very late, when the damage is already done.

Try to build your FRP conservatively next time.

Shitty OKW players always pretend like FRP is a penalty, while it is a bonus.

There are NO risks in FRP, unless you're got so used to FRP faceroll on big maps in teamgames that you're building it in the middle of map.


P.S.: I hope they will have guts to remove FRPs compeletely just to see how folks like you will cry on the forums. Oooooh, the Sweet Tears of Unfathomable Sadeness! The game would be so much better in big modes.