Profile of Antilles950

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 168

General Information


Thread: Flame nades and regular nades7 Dec 2015, 16:51 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 16:10 PMMagpie842 A>) Spios have too many abilities already. Remember they already unlock concussive grenades via veterancy too. B>) Spios with flame nades?? Really?? Their point blank DPS is already insane, I think that this would be too much. I mentioned earlier that the concussive grenade they have can just be replaced with a incendiary nade. I also think it's preferable to have one unit with that kind of high dps than to have a ton of scalable volks that can also run around clearing team weapons and garrisons in 1 shot In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Flame nades and regular nades7 Dec 2015, 01:55 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Dec 2015, 01:45 AMBeefSurge Anyone else remember the grenade Volks had a year ago that detonated in literally half a second? Bring those back...and increase their popcap/MP cost. Nah. Those were the same as airborne cooked grenades. They were too much In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Flame nades and regular nades7 Dec 2015, 01:38 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2015, 09:08 AMWhat Doth Life?! I'm gonna have to contradict you here ...Sturms have too many abilities already. I think you could replace the sturms useless concussion grenade with flame nades In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should the Stuart have a dedicated role?6 Dec 2015, 22:36 PM This is such a ridiculously leading question In: Lobby
Thread: Human waves6 Dec 2015, 06:48 AM Very fun game vs Strategos. In: Replays
Thread: Flame nades and regular nades5 Dec 2015, 09:05 AM Anyone that's played this patch knows that OKW can spam much more nades now. This is especially potent because they never internalize the cost in terms of tech costs. I was thinking it might make sense to move flame nades to sturmpioneers, and give volks their regular grenades back. I think this does 3 things: 1. It helps the sturm pioneer excel at a niche role of being an assault/flanking/garrison-clearing unit. 2. It limits the amount of flame nade spam, and makes garrisons more useful vs OKW. OKW has to dedicate specific expensive units to do it now, instead of just having all mainline infantry being able to clear garrisons. This lines up with other factions that need things like mortars or flamethrower engis to do it. 3. Grens still have a good amount of utility with regular nades, just not the ability to completely push out garrisons and push back weapon teams. Thoughts? Edit: Someone below suggested a great idea of replacing the concussive grenade with the incendiary nade for sturms. Placing this behind vet might be an interesting idea. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Countering pak howitzer as wehrmacht?1 Dec 2015, 04:57 AM If someone is going for a Stuart, try not to spend munitions on anything that isn't lmgs. Getting 2 lmgs should give your grens the ability to hold off rifles and the impact of a pak howitzer on mg42s shouldn't be so effective on your defense as a whole. Try and fight around a key structure, which will mitigate the pak howitzers ability to suppress and actually still reduces it's damage. You should also switch the position (even if it's just slightly) every single time your opponent see's your mg42. This can prevent future flanks and will help to mitigate the impact of a pak howitzer. If your micro is really good, you might not even want to set up your mg until you see your opponent, so that you're always in the right position. You might also want to try and play with a siper. In: Lobby
Thread: October Pyramid Of Stronkness28 Nov 2015, 23:46 PM \|\/\/\/\| Does anyone want a blue partyhat? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ugh26 Nov 2015, 04:26 AM ugh In: Replays
Thread: USF at-gun AP rounds26 Nov 2015, 01:10 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Nov 2015, 01:07 AMferwiner Why is this thread in gameplay forums? It is obviously ballance thread and the word "ballance" is even in opening post. Twice. Mmmm I misclicked In: COH2 Gameplay