Profile of donofsandiego

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 1379

General Information
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJT-oswDRyOrhrVghT-6ZRw
Steam: 76561198157193379
Nationality:

United States
Game Name: Snaek

Signature

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?..The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and... the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough...We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

― Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Royal engineer Recovery Squad26 Apr 2022, 14:38 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2022, 14:19 PMHannibal Maybe someone else can chip in. I cannot recall seeing the Jeep being abused in 3v3. The reason why it lost its crew is also a different one. My point still stands: The WC51 can transport units, it even comes with close range cav rifles. Outside of 1v1 streams and tourneys, I have not seen this being used/abused. I still very vividly remember Chav drivebys. You'd decrew the WC51 so the UKF player with his CP0 ass tommies could tear enemy players a new asshole without ever having to leave the vehicle. Something USF can't do for another CP. EDIT: I don't play 3v3 so idk but 4v4 this was a very popular (and incredibly f*cking effective) tactic. Many tasty MGs were stolen.. In: Lobby
Thread: Royal engineer Recovery Squad26 Apr 2022, 11:37 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2022, 09:50 AMVipper I have 2.594 games as UKF. Well that explains it. That's nearly three whole games /j In: Lobby
Thread: Royal engineer Recovery Squad26 Apr 2022, 11:33 AM I don't really see what the issue is, Vipper. After all Royal Engineer recovery squad is more expensive than grenadiers. Why shouldn't they win? In: Lobby
Thread: Why was thompson riflemen never a thing?24 Apr 2022, 22:09 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Apr 2022, 18:04 PMrumartinez89 How would it be shit at close range? It would be worse than Cavalry Rifleman but that wouldn't be the correct comparison since I said I want Thompsons instead of Bars on Regular Rifleman. They would be quite a bit better until about range 20. So I am giving up the long range of the bar for better short range which is where Rifleman should be fighting anyways while still maintaining the ability to snare. EDIT: Just to clear up my thought process, the Thompson upgrade I am talking about would be unique to Rifle company(remove halftrack). Since the commander comes with mines, sandbags, flares and fire-up for Rifleman I am proposing 2 Thompson since any more would probably make the commander OP, however 3 might be ok. Fire up would allow you to close the distance so the long distance damage of BAR would be irrelevant and Flares for attack/flank planning. +1 On a side note, reading this makes my heart ache remembering how WFA factions got barely any commanders at all compared to Ost and Sov. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why was thompson riflemen never a thing?24 Apr 2022, 02:04 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2022, 21:41 PMLoopDloop If you want a cqc squad it should have all cqc weapons in order to maximize its dps at the only range you should be using it at. Which is cqc. Three garands would not beat any squad at long range except assgrens or pioneers and if you have thompsons you should be closing to use them. Pretty self-explanatory. If you want a squad that does passably well at medium-long while still being very good close-medium then get BARs. No thanks. I want a squad with one scoped garand, a grease gun, a PTRS, one thompson, and a luger. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why was thompson riflemen never a thing?23 Apr 2022, 20:33 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2022, 20:20 PMLoopDloop Or you could just put BARs and ave functionally the same thing except better in every way. I don't see why anyone would want thompsons and garands on the same squad. Because grease guns are ass at long range. Pretty self-explanatory. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What really grinds your gears in CoH2?19 Apr 2022, 20:11 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Apr 2022, 08:25 AMTheGentlemenTroll When I vetoed Shittard Summer and then waited 10 minutes to play a 1 hr shittard summer match. Lmfao I think there are 2 entries for that map in the Vs. AI map pool. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Has anyone noticed Grenadiers are really good?17 Apr 2022, 20:01 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2022, 19:14 PMKoRneY What the fuck? Maybe learn the game instead of snickering over bullshit. Cry about it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Has anyone noticed Grenadiers are really good?17 Apr 2022, 18:40 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2022, 18:30 PMEsxile Hum... Are you aware Ostheer start with 80 manpower more than other factions? It's called we do a little trolling. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For coh3, why not be a bit esporty17 Apr 2022, 18:24 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2022, 18:20 PMCrecer13 I think this is due to a misunderstanding. It's not esports that attracts people to the game, but the game that attracts people to esports. If the game sucks but is focused on "e-sports" (DoW3), then nothing good will come of it. A good quality game attracts a diverse audience, including people who organize tournaments. So the main recipe for "e-sports" is a good, interesting game. Thank you. Agree 100% In: COH3 Central