Profile of 12ocky

I think you're underestimating what the fear of 100% CS will do to the prevalence of Snipers. They'll be firing less > less need to get a Sniper to counter-snipe. But we'll see.

I think you underestimate the power of the fog of war. Sneak up a sniper get that 100 percent shot and turn the game around. That certain 340mp trade I was talking about. Sure you could have some gamesense your opponent invested in something. But that could have been a teching up just aswell.
You paralyze him into fear on a possibility? That's a joke, that's even a bigger gamble the player needs to take than 50% chance insurance policy.
Recon Run spam new meta?

If you make a 100% countersnipe you need to make a 100% penetration, assured criticals, Mo more M8's dodging pak shots, Less arty scatter ... etc etc
And don't you start talking about dice rolls, because one is enough to decide the game. It's not only about sniper you know: that one bundled grenade whiping out that vet 3 rifle, that near instant arty without a warning immediately whiping out a squad. Dat howitzer shells bouncing off the low health KT ....

Anyways i'm really bored and tired with sniper discussions. Terribly bored.

Changes to mortars would also change the mortar vs mortar gameplay, which is quite good right now (when it occurs).

It doesn't occur often because they are have more downsides than snipers and thus aren't build as often, which brings us to increase importance of snipers instead of buffing counternsipe dilemma again.
+ It's not that good tbh, one lucky shot when you are moving your mortar can means it's gone.

About new contorsnaaaipeeeh; You took a non perfect system and replaced it with a non perfect system. It's not worse, but it's certainly not better either. I'm opposed I vote on democrats (conservative) for this one. And for importance of snipers in games dominating high level games: Congratulations you just increased it by let's say ... a 100%. The reason why they are so dominant is because they are a non risky unit. It does exactly what you expect from it AND now even more.

Imo if you do wanna stick to gayass 100% u'd really have to remove that unit sniped button. It makes it so easy to countersnipe. In return u could increase detection range for infantry slightly.

But I'm tired of these discussions about snipers vs snipers, it's a street with no end. I will not persuade you, No other person will persuade me, imo: the current system is the best. Some guys are waaaaay too focused on sniper vs sniper.
It's like buying a new pair of pink shoes and being obessed these shoes must fit your feet perfectly when they don't. But you really want to wear these shoes so you'd even pay for surgery to change your feet so the shoes would fit.(what did you exactly do to target tables of small arms?)
You even forgot the shoes are gay. (pink)

How is For The Fatherland fair? When it's on you still have 20 percent chance to miss. (So your next idea will be to increase accuracy even further to 1.25 or something, but what this also does is; change the close combat behaviour snipers have vs each other. BAM insta death for the one that shoots first. (remember Seb vs Razor?)
SO WHUT WE GONNA DO BOB? We lower accuracy on all ranges and increase on infantry ,heroic and elite in target table, right Bob? Damn Bob what happened to your feet ...

Sniper reload bug up

Isn't this the way how every weapon behaves though(?), and thus reload should just be increased?

Same, hit up this (incredibly rusty) vCoH player if you want a game

did u increase damage vs stug on bombing run?

Some thoughts on Langres in relation to wehr snipers. For me this has always been one of the main reasons why Langres is just extremely hard to play as US (One of the others being the US base is just a leisurely stroll away from your cutoff).

For me it's the green stone wall that needs to be back, that's the one that stopped Mg's being so powerful on Langres.

So essentially you want to raise the accuracy to 100% with a sure chance to kill at every situation?

No I want it to stay exactly the same way it is, because of any proposition or any idea regarding the cs (including my own ideas) I don't think it would create better gameplay. In the past there were tests with snipers not killing each other off completely or 100pct countersnipe, it just doesn't feel right.

RNG is the name of the game, you have it in almost every unit and ability. Howitzer can kill all or hit nothing, same with nebels and stuff. I'm not sure snipers deserve to be any different.
Why does a countersniper HAVE TO succeed? It's basically this: If you spend 340 manpower you are certain to take away his 340 manpower.