Login

russian armor

Fallschirmjäger is very OP!

PAGES (25)down
8 Oct 2019, 05:51 AM
#441
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Oct 2019, 04:45 AMKobal


Indeed, there need to be a counter to the camo camp lol, it feels so obnoxious

The other player sat up an ambush, planned each step of it and waited until the right moment to execute it. Its like a land mine that requires active input and it's obnoxious because it's effective?

People Like low skills plays, it seems
8 Oct 2019, 05:55 AM
#442
avatar of Kasarov
Senior Modmaker Badge

Posts: 422 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Oct 2019, 04:45 AMKobal


OKW: Kubel, Jagdpanzer


If you've ever been in a Jagdpanzer you'd know visibility was shit. (Yeah, I know T-70 visibility was shit too, but at least the recon mode looks convincing). You'd also never "scout" with a tank destroyer.

Why not Luchs or Puma instead? Both were used in recon roles IRL.
8 Oct 2019, 06:12 AM
#443
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351


I wonder if it's possible to perhaps instead of a dps buff (or maybe just a smaller one) it's possible to inflict a debuff on the targeted squad that reduces their own output making ambush units more durable in an ambush vs relying on raw firepower alone.


Well, if a lot of players like it imo the bonus could stay but should be significantly smaller (but across the board for all non paying ambush units). The rule of a thumb imo should be, though, that if the ambush ability (or any ability for that matter) is not reflected in the unit's price it should not be there as the cheese potential is too significant.
8 Oct 2019, 09:27 AM
#444
avatar of Kobal

Posts: 155


The other player sat up an ambush, planned each step of it and waited until the right moment to execute it. Its like a land mine that requires active input and it's obnoxious because it's effective?

People Like low skills plays, it seems


If you mean setting up an ambush as falchis to just move in in yellow cover and then press hold fire then yeah, it's really hard to accomplish.
8 Oct 2019, 09:28 AM
#445
avatar of Kobal

Posts: 155



If you've ever been in a Jagdpanzer you'd know visibility was shit. (Yeah, I know T-70 visibility was shit too, but at least the recon mode looks convincing). You'd also never "scout" with a tank destroyer.

Why not Luchs or Puma instead? Both were used in recon roles IRL.



Im not really wanting that either I was just quoting him since some ideas were great, like detection on light tanks and light vehicules.
8 Oct 2019, 10:01 AM
#446
avatar of ullumulu

Posts: 2243

AT partisans and AT cons are AT specialsits with nades and AT handheld. and cost under 240mp.

Fallies are AI specailsists with a panzerfaust and cost 340mp. I dont see the big difference here.

what do exspect from a cheap squad? AI and AT specialkste with camo? comon.

fallis can only faust...and dthan must retreat. no AT specialist or something.
8 Oct 2019, 10:08 AM
#447
avatar of Serrith

Posts: 783

AT partisans and AT cons are AT specialsits with nades and AT handheld. and cost under 240mp.

Fallies are AI specailsists with a panzerfaust and cost 340mp. I dont see the big difference here.

what do exspect from a cheap squad? AI and AT specialkste with camo? comon.

fallis can only faust...and dthan must retreat. no AT specialist or something.


They can threaten a snare which is a big deal. It functions as a greater form of area denial than a shrek or zook on their own.
8 Oct 2019, 10:21 AM
#448
avatar of Maret

Posts: 711

AT partisans and AT cons are AT specialsits with nades and AT handheld. and cost under 240mp.

Fallies are AI specailsists with a panzerfaust and cost 340mp. I dont see the big difference here.

what do exspect from a cheap squad? AI and AT specialkste with camo? comon.

fallis can only faust...and dthan must retreat. no AT specialist or something.

If AI specialist with camo have access to snare, could AT specialists with camo have access to bundle nade? I don't ask about fisrt strike AI bonus to enemy infantry adn longrange AI. Just bundle nade.
8 Oct 2019, 11:05 AM
#449
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

Once again, if faust is taken from Falls, then combined with the Valiant Assault nerfs there absolutely needs to be a buff to the commander to keep it usable.

Possible candidates would be: Ostwind, JU87 AT strafe, Luftwaffe field officer (command squad that can call in plane smoke, plane strafe like airborne paratroopers and heal squads)

My absolute favourite and what I would do is I would grab the Jaeger Urban assault infantry from game files, rework it a bit to have 4 kar 98s, pioneer vision, stealth but no first strike, smoke nades and set up reinforce beacons for Falls to reinforce with, you’d obviously rename the squad to something like Luftwaffe Reconnaisance Infantry.
8 Oct 2019, 11:26 AM
#450
avatar of JibberJabberJobber

Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3

Once again, if faust is taken from Falls, then combined with the Valiant Assault nerfs there absolutely needs to be a buff to the commander to keep it usable.

Possible candidates would be: Ostwind, JU87 AT strafe, Luftwaffe field officer (command squad that can call in plane smoke, plane strafe like airborne paratroopers and heal squads)


Euhm :rolleyes:
8 Oct 2019, 11:31 AM
#451
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

8 Oct 2019, 11:39 AM
#452
avatar of Raviloli

Posts: 72



?


There already is an AT strafe in it, which simoultaneously allows Falls to reinforce in the middle of it as it's going on.
8 Oct 2019, 15:28 PM
#453
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

Lol lutwaffe already has a better version of the stuka AT loiter. How can you say it's a bad Commander if you don't even know what it's strongest ability is
8 Oct 2019, 15:48 PM
#454
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

Lol lutwaffe already has a better version of the stuka AT loiter. How can you say it's a bad Commander if you don't even know what it's strongest ability is


I never said it’s a bad commander, I said it needs a buff if Falls get nerfed again.

Any other words you wanna put in my mouth?
8 Oct 2019, 15:49 PM
#455
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3



There already is an AT strafe in it, which simoultaneously allows Falls to reinforce in the middle of it as it's going on.


My mistake then, didn’t realize airborne assault had the same AT strafe, I thought it was a lesser version of the Ostheer JU87 AT strafe.

I still think the other suggestions were good.
8 Oct 2019, 15:53 PM
#456
avatar of blancat

Posts: 810



I never said it’s a bad commander, I said it needs a buff if Falls get nerfed again.

Any other words you wanna put in my mouth?



falls - roll back to last version and make them can call in 2cp

add concrete bunkers to heavy fortification (2cp)

done

8 Oct 2019, 15:53 PM
#457
avatar of Maret

Posts: 711

Just replace faust on demo, like paras and CE have. IT's better fit to diversion troops neither antitank weapon.
8 Oct 2019, 15:57 PM
#458
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Fallschirmjager need to lose either snares or camo.

The counter to this sort of cloaking stealth unit is light vehicles. The camo snare combination eliminates this counter.
8 Oct 2019, 15:58 PM
#459
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post8 Oct 2019, 15:53 PMMaret
Just replace faust on demo, like paras and CE have. IT's better fit to diversion troops neither antitank weapon.


Mines are even better. Should also allow okw player to put down mines if the Sturmpioneer dies.
8 Oct 2019, 16:01 PM
#460
avatar of Lago

Posts: 3260

Mines are even better. Should also allow okw player to put down mines if the Sturmpioneer dies.


If they remain cloaking, quick TTK elite anti-infantry units, they should have no anti-tank capabilitity whatsoever.

There's a good reason Paratroopers, Shock Troops, Obersoldaten, Commandos, JLI, Thompson Rangers, et cetera are completely impotent against vehicles.
PAGES (25)down
2 users are browsing this thread: 2 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

488 users are online: 488 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49883
Welcome our newest member, Hovingtrik7
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM