wtf are u talking about, everyone has to tech for high armoured units, and bazookas tend to be VERY good vs anything below the panther, which is majority of axis vehicles. The only faction that has a right to cry is USF because of ther low armour but UKF has high armoured tanks where bazookas wont do sht, and in fact you can use doctrines as a reason for soviets because most of ther doctrines gives them access to very good tanks, soviets doctrines are unique in that regard then to every other faction. (when soviets where originally designed the faction play style was designed to be relied on what doctrine u chose which is why they have some of the best and most useful doctrines).
are you claiming allies don't have good mobile AT inf too? what makes them just as dangerous is the ability to snare. Look, in order to get double shreks for example, they come on an expensive squad 4 man squad or for OKW in 2 doc's, while for e.g. uSF can equip riflemen squad with X2 bazookas WITH snare or put it on a dirt cheap rear echleon squad, no doc;s required. UKF can do them same on engineers with snare. ALL factions can have powerful inf AT, however, which is better is situational but one thing clearly going for allies is the accessibility.
You are misunderstanding. Of the allies only brits have high armored units stock. Soviet and usf have to pick a doctrine for them. They ARE in the highest tiers but are not stock. In contrast Ost has panther and brum who are pretty beefy and the p4 with skirts is tough too, all 3 able to bounce Shreks, piats and zooks if RNG allows. Okw has light vehcles and armour with 230+ no in between. Same story.
UKF have Churchill and comets but that's it for all allied stock armour with over 230 value.