Problem is IS and Penals overperforming compared to Rifleman.
And your argument to support that thesis is.... ?
Because brits have much lower infantry presence then USK and penals are not only most expensive mainline inf at 300mp, they also come latest, are always outnumbered and have worst scaling, yes, they have good vet, but they don't get weapon upgrades and their RA vet is extremely low compared to any other inf in game.
IS might be overperforming out of cover compared to their original intended dynamics, but that's addressed next patch if I understood correctly, penals are pure L2P issue.
I don't get why people want to faceroll axis just like those two ridicilous powerhouses. Rifles are probably the the best matched infantry to axis infantry (Like seriously).
They don't - they simply want units to perform accordingly to their cost. Volks cost 250 and perform as they were 270. Rifles themselves are pretty fine actually.
But when you compare them to other allied infantry they are lackluster. That's why in 2v2's Brit-Soviet composition is being choosen.
Actually, compared to rifles and tommies, its penals who end up as luckluster as while they are excellent out of the gate, they slow down with below average late game scaling(vet alone vs vet+weapons everyone else but cons get).