Login

russian armor

M42 light AT gun canister shot, maybe over nerfed?

6 Jul 2019, 07:17 AM
#1
avatar of flyingpancake

Posts: 186 | Subs: 1

I have been using M42 at gun lately and I remember that in a recent patch the canister shot got a range nerf. The range is so short and the ammo switch time so long that is feels a bit pointless. How do you guys feel about this?
6 Jul 2019, 07:52 AM
#2
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

Classic overnerf you are right.
6 Jul 2019, 08:40 AM
#3
avatar of aerafield

Posts: 3045 | Subs: 3

Say thanks to the people who abused canister rounds hard by getting a M42 blob.

And I dont think it's useless, you just need inf support nearby now
6 Jul 2019, 09:01 AM
#4
avatar of flyingpancake

Posts: 186 | Subs: 1

Say thanks to the people who abused canister rounds hard by getting a M42 blob.

And I dont think it's useless, you just need inf support nearby now


Never said it was useless, its a good medium tank counter for a cheap price. the canister shot does not seem worth it right now. I say increase the range or decrease the ammo swap time.
6 Jul 2019, 09:15 AM
#5
avatar of aerafield

Posts: 3045 | Subs: 3



Never said it was useless, its a good medium tank counter for a cheap price. the canister shot does not seem worth it right now. I say increase the range or decrease the ammo swap time.


Worth it for what? The ability is free
6 Jul 2019, 09:15 AM
#6
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Say thanks to the people who abused canister rounds hard by getting a M42 blob.

And I dont think it's useless, you just need inf support nearby now

There were so many suggestions how to nerf it and make it inefficient when blobbed while keeping it useful without range nerf.

Canister shot with 35 range got soviet demo charge'd.
6 Jul 2019, 09:21 AM
#7
avatar of JibberJabberJobber

Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3

A cheap AT gun countering its counter wasn't a good idea from the start.
6 Jul 2019, 10:05 AM
#8
avatar of Hannibal
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3118 | Subs: 2

I'm probably late with suggestions, but had it been considered to nerf the arch when in canister shot mode?
As far as I could see it, the problem was people spamming 2-3 of these and annihilating charging infantry. A smaller arch makes it easier to just run through it quickly and dodge the damage, while it would reward good micro and a good setup for defensive positions
7 Jul 2019, 12:14 PM
#9
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

The ability should simply me removed or reduced to single shot. The units is still very cheap and cost efficient.
7 Jul 2019, 13:27 PM
#10
avatar of aerafield

Posts: 3045 | Subs: 3

I'm probably late with suggestions, but had it been considered to nerf the arch when in canister shot mode?
As far as I could see it, the problem was people spamming 2-3 of these and annihilating charging infantry. A smaller arch makes it easier to just run through it quickly and dodge the damage, while it would reward good micro and a good setup for defensive positions


and what do I do on chokepoints? :snfPeter:
7 Jul 2019, 13:45 PM
#11
avatar of Hannibal
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3118 | Subs: 2



and what do I do on chokepoints? :snfPeter:

I hope this is sarcasm
7 Jul 2019, 14:21 PM
#12
avatar of KoRneY

Posts: 682

It was broken as fuck. People who abused knew it was. Just like people with spamming JLI when they were ridiculous, it was easy peazey to spot a grade A shitbag if they were using or abusing this.
7 Jul 2019, 15:07 PM
#13
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Jul 2019, 14:21 PMKoRneY
It was broken as fuck. People who abused knew it was. Just like people with spamming JLI when they were ridiculous, it was easy peazey to spot a grade A shitbag if they were using or abusing this.


It was OP but the nerf was a bit too much. Reducing the range wasn´t really that great of an idea. Maybe making the cannister rounds cost muni and be a timed ability would have been better. Something like 20 muni for 10 seconds of cannister rounds. That way it would have been in-line with Zis3 and SU76.
7 Jul 2019, 16:25 PM
#14
avatar of Farlion

Posts: 379 | Subs: 1

A dirt-cheap, early call-in should not be as decisive as it was.

It was correctly nerfed to the ground.
7 Jul 2019, 16:50 PM
#15
avatar of Cresc

Posts: 378

It was a bad design from start, so just remove it and find another way to make the M42 not shit.
7 Jul 2019, 17:05 PM
#16
avatar of Crecer13

Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Jul 2019, 16:50 PMCresc
It was a bad design from start, so just remove it and find another way to make the M42 not shit.


in M-42 there is no point at all in the presence of ZIS-3. M-42 is a relic of a terrible starting design (hello conscripts and penals). ZIS-3 was the commander ability, M-42 was built in the building. But at the same time, in the opposite side, the Elephant could be built in T4 without a commander. M-42 remained until the end of the war because it was light and had frag and canister shoots.
7 Jul 2019, 17:07 PM
#17
avatar of Jae For Jett
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2

I dont actually think having canister rounds cost munitions would have put the game in a better spot (because yes, I would say they were such a problem that they damaged/affected the state of the game).

Soviet players tend to float a lot of munitions anyway, especially with the urban and community defense doctrines. Which would end up meaning the nerf would likely be fairly meaningless. You could toy with other options like limited uptime (as one user said, 10 seconds per use) or a prohibitively high munitions cost, but I dont think that wouldve made them feel any better to face. It would do nothing about the ability being, in blunt shorthand, cancer to use and face. Itll still shotgun stuff from outside range of retaliation, and that was basically the fundamental issue. A cancerous ability that costs munitions/is timed is still a cancerous ability and you dont make players feel any better when its used against them by making it cost resources (that probably wouldnt have been used on anything else anyway, at that).

As for the suggestion of limiting its arc while canister shot is used, it would still counter garrisons and weapon teams from outside retaliation range, and even against infantry, they can pack up, relocate, and reface too quickly for arc nerfs to be meaningful. And then if you nerf the setup time, then you nerf the m42 in its at role, and thats not needed.

My thoughts were really disorganized here, but the main things I want to get across are:

A cancerous ability that costs munitions is still cancerous. The m42 performed fine in its AT role, so nerfs would have ideally left it untouched outside of canister rounds (besides them being a little too cheap too, of course). Canister rounds were intended as a self defense/general defensive tool with limited uses in ambushes/supporting other units in said ambush - that mark was clearly missed. A unit should not be able to perform well against all units in both an offensive and defensive role - that inherently asks for it to be spammed.
7 Jul 2019, 17:23 PM
#18
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

A dirt-cheap, early call-in should not be as decisive as it was.

It was correctly nerfed to the ground.

By that logic, we should further nerf JLI, let them rot in prison of uselessness after that short period of being OP AF, abused and spammed by every OKW player.
7 Jul 2019, 17:26 PM
#19
avatar of RoastinGhost

Posts: 416 | Subs: 1

Why not just remove canister rounds, and give the M42 an accuracy bonus vs light vehicles like the 6lbr just lost? Maybe that would make its role more distinct?
7 Jul 2019, 17:46 PM
#20
avatar of Farlion

Posts: 379 | Subs: 1


By that logic, we should further nerf JLI, let them rot in prison of uselessness after that short period of being OP AF, abused and spammed by every OKW player.


We should, when JLIs can tackle infantry, vehicles and support weapons without a worry in the world.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Yesterday, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Yesterday, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

284 users are online: 284 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
14 posts in the last week
79 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53178
Welcome our newest member, b52clubbapp
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM