Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
The Panzerfusiliers upgrade to 2 Pzshreks is good but I think it would suit better for Sturmpio instead. Since Panzerfuisiliers are doc and especially they have access to snares making them too good.
Posts: 1
Posts: 1002 | Subs: 2
The point stands. If x is an issue and has to get Removed why reintroduce x+ at a later date?
The 5 minute T70 from industry was a disaster, but perhaps if it was to come at 4 minutes....
I guess the feedback is: we don't have frequent eniugh patches to break the game trying amped up versions of things already determined to not work because they are fundamentally flawed by design.
If (when) we relearn that durable units carrying AT that is guaranteed to pen armour frontally on the snap is a bad design how long are we going to sit with it broken? JLI was a few months (the Soviet AT ARTY was patched very rapidly though)
Its frustrating knowing it's a bad idea (knowing because we already dealt with it, just with less durable squad...) and knowing that it's going to smolder and choke out more of the dwindling player base.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
You said “if the role is mainline infantry, then give them sandbags”. Penals were the mainline infantry alternative to conscripts for a while and didn’t have sandbags. Even if they were stock units, that doesn’t mean anything. KT is a stock heavy tank but it still adheres to the 1 heavy tank limit. Being stock or not doesn’t matter much, it’s about how you balance things and giving Fussies sandbags and scavenge would be too powerful. I appreciate the balance team trying to make fussies/volks a choice and not a no brainer.
Posts: 783
Panzerfusiliers lose access to their AT Riflegrenade once they upgrade to Schrecks.
ukf
usf
okw
soviets
ostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. 
Posts: 1351
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
PLS explain why in your opinion giving Fusiliers the scavenger ability "would be too powerful".
Posts: 783
How about make them holster panzershrecks just like they do with sweepers?
ukfusfokwsovietsostheer. Do not judge me, for my opinion is balanced. Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Because they’re trying to balance risk vs reward of usig either Pzfusiliers or Volks. They decided that fusies not getting scavenge or sandbags balances the choice.
Posts: 232
Posts: 184
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Ostwinds penetration against mediums seems way too high
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 220
Posts: 184
Its 25% against frontal armor.
Posts: 1392
Lol thats just nad rng mate. And 2 games dont show a problem.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1351
That would make up for its lackluster AT and cost of 70 ammo. That is a good idea! Who needs cold immunity anyway!
I mean, it think its better for OKW sake to have a proficient infantry AT role like any other faction. To have 2 Pzshreks wouuld make it proficient have finally an AT mobile infantry unit.
Posts: 1351
the balance is terrible, the total dominance of the Germans from the start with the early OP KT and Tiger.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
To me ost is fine but I really have problems with okw. But maybe I have to play them a bit to learn play against them.
Posts: 1351
The Wehrmacht also dominates excellently at the start thanks to the assault grenadiers.
I also received a new meta 12 minute Tiger.
 |
|
|
78 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
|
|
|
|
29 | ||
 |
|
|
126 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
