Login

russian armor

Should all AT rifle have normal rifle accuracy?

Penal and cons PTRS need change?
Option Distribution Votes
69%
13%
13%
6%
Total votes: 16
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
7 Apr 2019, 07:40 AM
#1
avatar of WAAAGH2000

Posts: 731

Yes,I mean PTRS for penal and cons(they are same weapon),I agree upgrade PTRS reduce AI dps,but I disagree “lost” AI ability,so I think it can balance dps at other date
7 Apr 2019, 08:09 AM
#2
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

We've been there, done that and it leads to bad things.
7 Apr 2019, 09:02 AM
#5
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Imo At weapons should not be able to hit infantry.

AI could could come from timed abilities increasing the AI for a limited timed.

The ability could be named "take aim" and work like "hit the ground" but giving AT rifles AI for the duration.

this ability should limited to units like Guards and Tank hunters.
7 Apr 2019, 10:14 AM
#6
avatar of SeductiveCardbordBox

Posts: 591 | Subs: 1

As funny as it was for conscripts to actually be useful - no. It's supposed to be a trade off for AT with good reason.
7 Apr 2019, 13:21 PM
#7
avatar of borobadger

Posts: 184

Penals were broken when the PTRS upgrade destroyed infantry too
7 Apr 2019, 13:53 PM
#8
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279

Hard no. at should be a choice not an easy transition.
7 Apr 2019, 14:03 PM
#9
avatar of Balanced_Gamer

Posts: 783

It is like saying Panzershreks will have AI capabilities. I would say no. It can not be one sided otherwise it has to be all AT to get some AI damage.

I would say no. All AT weaponry should lose their AI damage capabilites. Surprisingly Guard Rifle Infantry is the only unit that seems to break that concept.
7 Apr 2019, 14:30 PM
#10
avatar of borobadger

Posts: 184

It is like saying Panzershreks will have AI capabilities. I would say no. It can not be one sided otherwise it has to be all AT to get some AI damage.

I would say no. All AT weaponry should lose their AI damage capabilites. Surprisingly Guard Rifle Infantry is the only unit that seems to break that concept.


Guards AI is poor until they get the DP28 upgrade though
8 Apr 2019, 13:05 PM
#11
avatar of Balanced_Gamer

Posts: 783



Guards AI is poor until they get the DP28 upgrade though


That is true. Their PTRS hits frequently against infantry dealing 27 damage, which is a lot of damage. They are quite superior in terms of long range. Even without upgrade.

Upgrade just makes them a lot better. This is the SU solution if you do not want to sacrifice Penals with PTRS upgrade. Take Guard Rifle Infantry instead!!!
8 Apr 2019, 13:12 PM
#12
avatar of adamírcz

Posts: 955

Maybe, but unfortunately, PTRSes are too terrible even against LVs, to be specialized AT, so they would need a buff elsewhere if their AI gets removed
8 Apr 2019, 15:30 PM
#13
avatar of EtherealDragon

Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1

You clearly weren't around for the "Dank Hunters" patch where you could just spam PTRS cons and hard counter everything through the early-mid game. Fun times.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

958 users are online: 958 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49107
Welcome our newest member, Falac851
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM