Discuss for the votes

Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2019, 05:05 AMIncendiaryRounds

You know I actually predicted that the initial USF mortar addition would be a complete disaster. I made a post about it well before it was on the live patch. And I was right.

Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2019, 05:33 AMTheGentlemenTroll

From what I understand Relic switched up the stats to be a copy of the AA mortar the day before patch after the balance team was testing a different mortar in the balance preview.

Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2019, 06:06 AMJae For Jett

Show Spoiler

Jump back to quoted post2 Mar 2019, 05:05 AMIncendiaryRounds

You know I actually predicted that the initial USF mortar addition would be a complete disaster. I made a post about it well before it was on the live patch. And I was right.

Jump back to quoted post3 Mar 2019, 20:42 PMAarotron

Now returning on topic i think usf commander focused on urban combat maybe should have rangers. Rangers could use some adjustment imo because they are a bit niche unit. 400 mp for cqc unit at 3cp when you have already enough rifles. I think they could use some additional upgrade choices to allow a bit more creativity in their usage.

Id like to have them either long range package with one m1919 or maybe bolt action rifles with good long range damage and supplementing ability like volley fire or such. Second would be tank hunter kit simular to paratrooper support squad with stonger bazooka and something like camo or mines. I also like idea of white phosphorous bazooka i have seen in spearhead mod, having single bazooka upgrade that can fire wp rocket to wanted location for munition cost (every rocket being wp would likely overperform)

I also think 1-3 cp satchel charge for rifles could work in commander as well.

Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2019, 17:47 PMVipper

I would like to point out that imo certain combination of abilities should be avoided for the new commanders. (and they should gradually be removed by older commanders)

For instance it has been suggested for the OKW Paks and Tiger should be available and for the Soviet CommanderT-34/85 should be available with ML-20.

Imo these combination should be avoid because the OKW will have both superior AT and Superior AI with the Tiger and Soviet will have both superior armor and superior indirect fire support.

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2019, 20:15 PMAarotron

Calliope just is straigth out bbad atm

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2019, 21:23 PM#12345678

I am not very happy with the results of the Soviet commander votes.

Airborne maybe fun to play, but it lacks the proper tools (T34-85/offmap bombing) to win against Axis in late games.

I would like to see if there is a Soviet commander to have T34-85 and il2 precise bombing (may be shock troop as well).

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2019, 22:24 PMOutsider_Sidaroth

I'm sad Special Support lost, but I hope Urban Assault will get the Calliope buffed, it would be good for USF even if the command is basically Armor but with rocket artillery.

Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2019, 21:46 PMTheGentlemenTroll

A thoughtful and interesting doctrine choice is better than making a new commander that cobbles together everything you need than gets picked 100% of the time. Il2, t-3485, and shock troops is not only super bland would probably be the best commander in all modes.

Same reason Grand Operations won for OKW, it has more flavor and Interesting ideas than a doctrine that gives it a bunch of at options that add little to no flavor.