Login

russian armor

Relic Winter Balance Preview v1.3 Update

PAGES (18)down
20 Dec 2016, 23:21 PM
#261
avatar of JackDickolson

Posts: 181


If you want to be taken seriously you will do as they request.

whatever you say, sunshine. Let me know when you have something intelligent to add, instead of simply agreeing with everyone and spamming "+1".



:nahnah:
20 Dec 2016, 23:45 PM
#262
avatar of Mistah_S

Posts: 851 | Subs: 1

whatever you say, sunshine. Let me know when you have something intelligent to add, instead of simply agreeing with everyone and spamming "+1".
:nahnah:


And agreeing with people isn't intelligent?
It gives the idea/comment more weight behind it, and bumps it, with the goal of having Smith and co add it to one of their lists.

Anyway, I'm not going to argue more for the sake of arguing.

@Mr Smith or GG, what are the odds of us getting additional 1k supply (or even 500) per game with the Balance preview mod on?
21 Dec 2016, 02:36 AM
#263
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

You know what would change the game for the better?

Halving the mg42 set-up time while narrowing it's arc of fire by a half as well.

That would tlead to the cool dynamic coh1 "positioning mg's vs flanking mg's" mechanic in early game





but what do i know....


Not much apparently :snfCHVGame:



MG 42 for comparison: vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/companyofheroes/images/9/97/Coh_2_screen_2.png/revision/latest?cb=20130624182142&path-prefix=en (hotlinking and hyperlinking with text won't work on this image so just pretend it's displayed proper)
21 Dec 2016, 03:02 AM
#264
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1



Not much apparently :snfCHVGame:



MG 42 for comparison: vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/companyofheroes/images/9/97/Coh_2_screen_2.png/revision/latest?cb=20130624182142&path-prefix=en (hotlinking and hyperlinking with text won't work on this image so just pretend it's displayed proper)


then reduce it by 30%
21 Dec 2016, 03:50 AM
#265
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

then reduce it by 30%


Why? I thought CoH1 was the golden example of balance, and their MG's had the same arc as the MG 42 does.

Why nerf the MG 42 anyway? It was shitty for a long time already.
21 Dec 2016, 04:01 AM
#266
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1



Why? I thought CoH1 was the golden example of balance, and their MG's had the same arc as the MG 42 does.



no...



Why nerf the MG 42 anyway? It was shitty for a long time already.


you didn't get my point anyway
21 Dec 2016, 05:27 AM
#267
avatar of TickTack

Posts: 578

Everyone's an idiot.

Just shut up now and let the balance team do their bit.
21 Dec 2016, 05:35 AM
#268
avatar of SeismicSquall

Posts: 156

penals have no role and never will. give satchel to engineers, remove penals from game and move on with our lives. waaaaay to much time is being spent on balancing a unit that is a solution in search of a problem. They. Have. No. Role
21 Dec 2016, 08:58 AM
#269
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

I had a dream... A dream where Conscripts were soviets mainline infantry, not Penals.
21 Dec 2016, 09:54 AM
#270
avatar of Von Kluge
Patrion 14

Posts: 3548 | Subs: 2

Balance mod guys reading this thread be like


Seriously, let them get on with it, give it a chance and stop flooding this thread with a myriad of ideas that are either out of scope or just bat shit stupid.
21 Dec 2016, 10:33 AM
#271
avatar of skemshead

Posts: 611

Balance mod guys reading this thread be like


Seriously, let them get on with it, give it a chance and stop flooding this thread with a myriad of ideas that are either out of scope or just bat shit stupid.


You do understand the point of a forum don't you.

If this thread offends you kindly fuck off.
21 Dec 2016, 10:46 AM
#272
avatar of maritn

Posts: 28

In fact all tiers currently have access to some form of light AT except Soviets. Wehr: AC, pak, PGs in T2 and grens in T1, USF: M20 w/ zooks, AA HT as light AT, Brits: 6-pdr.


Well, if grens count as light AT, cons should also. ;)
Add to that: 30 mun all-purpose mines.
21 Dec 2016, 10:55 AM
#273
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Dec 2016, 10:46 AMmaritn


Well, if grens count as light AT, cons should also. ;)
Add to that: 30 mun all-purpose mines.


Difference is that Cons require additional upgrade.
21 Dec 2016, 11:16 AM
#274
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1



Difference is that Cons require additional upgrade.


Difference is that Grenadier require a building so does Faust...
21 Dec 2016, 11:29 AM
#275
avatar of Gluhoman

Posts: 380

Maybe we delet penals and buff cons? Or make penals very specific unit and make cons main infantry as rifles
21 Dec 2016, 11:41 AM
#276
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Maybe we delet penals and buff cons? Or make penals very specific unit and make cons main infantry as rifles

I have suggested Penal as an ostturpen/assault grenadier hybrid squad and cons as a defensive...
Penal are cheap to mitigate the cost of T1 designed to flank with PPsh, ourah, molotov.

Conscript are defensive with sand bugs, and defensive ability something like hit the ground that cost MU and is timed.
21 Dec 2016, 11:48 AM
#277
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Dec 2016, 11:16 AMVipper


Difference is that Grenadier require a building so does Faust...


But you can't make grens without building #logic
21 Dec 2016, 11:58 AM
#278
avatar of vasa1719

Posts: 2635 | Subs: 4

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post21 Dec 2016, 11:16 AMVipper


Difference is that Grenadier require a building so does Faust...


I feel it cost so many MP and fuel in line tiers system.
21 Dec 2016, 12:00 PM
#279
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1



But you can't make grens without building #logic

You can, and faust is available to Ostruppen.

In addition your claim was that Gren have and advantage because their faust has not tech cost. It has it is the T1 building and it is actually a mandatory cost.

If things in your opinion should be equal one should not be able to make conscripts until he researched AT grenades...
21 Dec 2016, 12:13 PM
#280
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Dec 2016, 12:00 PMVipper

You can, and faust is available to Ostruppen.

In addition your claim was that Gren have and advantage because their faust has not tech cost. It has it is the T1 building and it is actually a mandatory cost.

If things in your opinion should be equal one should not be able to make conscripts until he researched AT grenades...


Sorry but your logic is so broken.
PAGES (18)down
5 users are browsing this thread: 5 guests

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

377 users are online: 377 guests
1 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
36 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48976
Welcome our newest member, debetexchange
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM