[2vs2] RIP Axis

Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 19:03 PMHighfiveeeee

I know that the rant of some Axis fanboys here is way too much over the edge but I honestly think that you have to be a fool to say that Axis and Allies are on the absolute same level in terms of winning possibility right now.

If you simply ignore all Katitof + Australian Magic posts, I think this board can develop some very interesting conversations. Sadly there are no many topics where they are not.

Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 22:55 PMAustralian Magic

Like you saying that Vickers is amazing at suppressing, almost as good as HMG42 so Mr. Smith had to wreck you so hard?

Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 14:20 PMMr.Smith

The following things hardcounter a WASP (which make it a terrible investment):
- 2 MGs firing on it at the same time
- 1 MG42 hitting vet1 can take up to 3 WASPs at the same time; solo; and the enemy doesn't even have the time to react
- The obligatory rushed 222 (no escape for WASP, and no snares to save it)

Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2016, 22:37 PMtenid

Quite frankly if you did that this place would become an echochamber. Ignoring opinions that don't agree with your own doesn't help conversation.

Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2016, 20:46 PMAustralian Magic

One could argue that Pershing is the most expensive medium tank (despite description, but who cares about them?)

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 06:35 AMstrafniki

pershing was labled as a heavy tank during ww2. this is a ww2 game. deal with it.

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 04:45 AMCorsin

You must be new here

These are guys who when 2 years ago the ISU-152 was 1 shotting squads at 100 range.... said things were balanced.


there's a difference between an opposed opinion... and community cancer.

If youre wandering why nearly half the community has left the game in the last few years... these "posters" are a prime example since for some reason relic seem to listen to them, which is why they cant get into Esports .

Jump back to quoted post11 May 2014, 10:34 AMAustralian Magic

Reduction of range is pointless. These are not tanks, these are guns so range should be huge. For me solution is to decrease accuracy. For example if target is over 70, chance to hit is around 20%.
As for ISU, reduction of AI is an option. It could be a little better than IS-2.

Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 19:10 PMAustralian Magic

Sure, ISU is strong, I guess it should kill 3-4 models (depends on squad) and lower hp so you can run away with 1-2 models and very low hp but it's ISU and it needs to wipe out some squads. Not every single shot but more often than any other units OR give it ability like Sherman, switching shells.

Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 19:07 PMAustralian Magic

Just remove Jadgtiger ability to shoot through obstacles and remove reduce ISU AoE.

Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2014, 15:11 PMAustralian Magic

ISU:
Firstly lower AoE. Make it more like Brummbar. Still chance to wipe squad but not with every 3 shots.
Secondly, make it only AI unit - but this change would force to change somehting with stock units and their AT power.
Thirdly, make it only AT unit but since it was designed as an assault gun it would be stupid.
Fourth, 40 range, when set up 70.

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 04:45 AMCorsin

You must be new here

These are guys who when 2 years ago the ISU-152 was 1 shotting squads at 100 range.... said things were balanced.

If youre wandering why nearly half the community has left the game in the last few years... these "posters" are a prime example since for some reason relic seem to listen to them, which is why they cant get into Esports .

Jump back to quoted post2 Sep 2016, 11:13 AMAustralian Magic

L2Read.

I'm saying that none side is supopossed to have temporary advantage but it's better if advantage switches from side to side than if it stayed with double OKW forever.

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 10:24 AMRMMLz

You're saying "I had brain cancer, but now I have blood cancer which is good for a change".

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 10:29 AMAustralian Magic

Yup becasue brain cancer is gone. Isn't that good?

If brain cancer stayed longer I would die probably but now I have only early blood cancer

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 11:09 AMullumulu

Yeah..i play USF..its totally easy. spam rifles, one pak...wait till pershing/ galliope...and game is won.

no much strategy need, no adrenalin cause of easy playstyle, u can play brits with a cup of tea..in 2 hands...

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 11:15 AMKatitof

Cool, can't wait to see you in top 10 USF.

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 11:33 AMullumulu

where are my tips? for fighting vs rifle blob? i postet replays....u said instead to cry..i should load up replays...

where are my secret, why i cant face rifleblobbs??

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 12:38 PMAustralian Magic

I did watch this "blob" replay.

1. Your teammate was pure shit, but that's not the case.
2. At 10-11min mark you floated 1100MP ( ). How hard was it to build 2 HMGs to stop zook blob? You had 3 Volks, SP, Luchs and 1100MP in bank while USF player did not float MP, made units and had stronger field presence. He also did not have nades.

So question is, what did you do to match his forces? Nothing.
You could put med truck for healing and 2 ISGs would bleed him very much or
you could make 2 HMGs to stop blob as he did not have Calliope commander as well.

He had Rangers, mortar, RE and I guess 4 Rifles. That's huge amount of infantry which only waits to bleed by ISGs or under suppression. It's not like it was ultimate 1919 blob but zooks blob....

Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2016, 15:21 PMstrafniki

exactly. pershing acts like medium tank. tiger like light tank. indeed.