Login

russian armor

17lbr to 14 Population

9 Jul 2016, 22:02 PM
#1
avatar of Carlos Danger

Posts: 362

Suggestion to reduce the British 17lbr anti-tank emplacement to 14 population from 20 population.

That's all.
9 Jul 2016, 22:11 PM
#2
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

Seems like Relic does not care since the Brits release...

:foreveralone:
9 Jul 2016, 23:40 PM
#3
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

4 post about 17 pound 99% of the forum said yes to cost and pop reduction in all 4
Lelic still no changes well idk
10 Jul 2016, 00:39 AM
#4
avatar of Tiger Baron

Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2

Apart from that and the eventual nerfs to British tanks which they will receive probably because of all of the complaints about them being cheap, I also strongly believe that the mortar emplacement needs to be replaced by a mobile mortar team and the mortar emplacement itself become a garrisonable (by mortars, and yes, it's possible) defensive position.

Other than that the complaints about the emplacements seems to have stopped, for now.
10 Jul 2016, 02:15 AM
#5
avatar of Arclyte

Posts: 692



14 is still too high. 12 pop at the most IMO.

Even with the lower pop I don't think I'd ever make it. It's way too fragile, and gets wrecked by pretty much everything except small arms fire.
10 Jul 2016, 02:30 AM
#6
avatar of Dangerous-Cloth

Posts: 2066

jump backJump back to quoted post10 Jul 2016, 02:15 AMArclyte


14 is still too high. 12 pop at the most IMO.

Even with the lower pop I don't think I'd ever make it. It's way too fragile, and gets wrecked by pretty much everything except small arms fire.


It also can't shoot through buildings, but has brace, but is never used because useless.
10 Jul 2016, 02:38 AM
#7
avatar of United

Posts: 253

Buff an emplacement? that sounds dangerous.
10 Jul 2016, 02:41 AM
#8
avatar of miragefla
Developer Relic Badge

Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13

It's pretty much the only emplacement that's not ridiculous simply because it can't nuke infantry or counter its counter aka Bofors Barrage. You can walk up nearly anything to it and kill it with its best counter probably being other ATGs. Furthermore, it can actually be flanked, unlike the 360 Bofors murder machine.

It deserves less population and maybe a slight fuel decrease.
10 Jul 2016, 02:48 AM
#9
avatar of Firesparks

Posts: 1930

17 pounder get outrange by the jagdtiger. even with lower pop cost, the 17 pounder is still screwed if the okw decided to bring a JT out.
10 Jul 2016, 02:52 AM
#10
avatar of someonewithideas

Posts: 27

17 pounder get outrange by the jagdtiger. even with lower pop cost, the 17 pounder is still screwed if the okw decided to bring a JT out.


Definitely find that interesting that Tanks outrange the stationary emplacement. I wish this could be looked at in some way.
10 Jul 2016, 06:07 AM
#12
avatar of Oversloth

Posts: 48

It's non-doctrinal.

There is absolutely no reason to decrease its population or cost relative to the PaK43, when the PaK43 is far easier to destroy, and requires a doctrine.

There is no comparison.
10 Jul 2016, 06:24 AM
#14
avatar of Ferdinand

Posts: 9

Its an emplacement which is rarely used already. A pop reduction and maybe a slight reduction in fuel would be helpful. The pak 43 no doubt needs some love as well. These two units do not have to be carbon copies of each other but need to be balanced and useful to the game... which they arent as of now.
10 Jul 2016, 06:46 AM
#15
avatar of MissCommissar

Posts: 673

see like I said you bring Soviet in post they are not even counted


I knew, that you will mention it, so I did it for fun :D

And really - B-4 for 20 popcap is normal? I just didn't want to make new thread for that.
10 Jul 2016, 06:48 AM
#16
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474



I knew, that you will mention it, so I did it for fun :D

And really - B-4 for 20 popcap is normal? I just didn't want to make new thread for that.
no you should make a thread for dat
10 Jul 2016, 07:13 AM
#17
avatar of JohnSmith

Posts: 1273

Do you guys mind not twisting this thread for Soviet propaganda purposes?
10 Jul 2016, 07:38 AM
#18
avatar of NEVEC

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1

20 pop is too much.
10 Jul 2016, 09:32 AM
#19
avatar of Carlos Danger

Posts: 362

17 pounder get outrange by the jagdtiger. even with lower pop cost, the 17 pounder is still screwed if the okw decided to bring a JT out.
That's a completely different can of worms lol.
10 Jul 2016, 09:47 AM
#20
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Rosbone: I would like to join in celebration with the 9% of Coh3 MP players who are getting ALL of the new maps. Woohoo! #3Tards
Last Friday, 19:22 PM
OKSpitfire: I hope that at least one of heavies is a like-for-like reskin of the coh 2 ISU-152. I miss that thing.
Last Friday, 10:23 AM
Rosbone: Buy our cool new large tanks that will never get played on the 4 new 1v1 maps added. Perfect synergy! :facepalm:
Last Thursday, 19:23 PM
Rosbone: Everyone ready for some deep penetration :snfPeter:
Last Thursday, 17:13 PM
Lady Xenarra: I'm sure the ppl who defended it as balanced for Allies will be screaming like they got scaled with boiling water, in COH3. How the tables turn.
Last Thursday, 11:33 AM
Willy Pete: I think it was nuts with any engine damage. Especially on superheavies
Last Thursday, 07:03 AM
aerafield: Personally I think without the ram ability, it's worse than loiters for example
Last Thursday, 00:09 AM
Willy Pete: It combined well with most slowing abilities, not just ram stuns
Last Wednesday, 23:36 PM
Willy Pete: Only??? I think not being able to shoot it down and the ramp up effect also had something to do with it
Last Wednesday, 23:34 PM
Willy Pete: Really
Last Wednesday, 23:30 PM
aerafield: AT overwatch was broken only because it came with the faction of T34 ramming
Last Wednesday, 22:29 PM
Willy Pete: Love to see Relic really learning from their past mistakes. Let's bring back the dumbest ability in coh2, and charge money for it
Last Wednesday, 20:34 PM
Willy Pete: New DAK commander will have AT overwatch as alternate choice to elefant
Last Wednesday, 20:33 PM
aaa: Funy thing new players dont know that. And are trying to compete vs hacks
Last Wednesday, 10:33 AM
aaa: Online gaming is trash in general, not just coh. On high level there are all cheats in most games
Last Wednesday, 10:24 AM
aaa: 2 cheaters in 3 days. MH and DH
Last Wednesday, 09:57 AM
aerafield: I am a simple man, I build Humvees with Pathfinders and Missile Launchers inside, I am happy
Last Tuesday, 20:57 PM
Lady Xenarra: aerafield lamevee spammer confirmed :nahnah:
Last Tuesday, 20:42 PM
aerafield: those who know, know: https://www.reddit.com/r/CompanyOfHeroes/s/fPk4yLIgmK
Last Tuesday, 15:40 PM
adamírcz: Might be onto somethin here, combine side armour existing, maps where flanking is a viable option, and hopefully also heavies actually being less manouverable than mediums (lookin at you coh2), and it might be fun gameplay
17 Feb 2025, 13:39 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

391 users are online: 391 guests
1 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
42 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51937
Welcome our newest member, sckoolorg
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM