And the brace ability but it got nerf few patches ago
![^_^ ^_^](/images/Smileys/happy.gif)
Atm the Bofors is far more balanced compared to how it was at the release of the British.
![:thumb: :thumb:](/images/Smileys/thumb.gif)
Posts: 97
Posts: 4474
i think that it would make brit support their emplacement and brace can still be used vs arty but not against ground attack and people would actually need to put unit inside emplacement to give them their bonus right now is ok they flanked my simcity better use brace while i kill their tank with at
You never stop to amaze me with your insanity.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
i think that it would make brit support their emplacement and brace can still be used vs arty but not against ground attack and people would actually need to put unit inside emplacement to give them their bonus right now is ok they flanked my simcity better use brace while i kill their tank with at
btw:I'm still waiting you in the Churchill post for your opinion kat but as always you have none only on the forum to troll
Posts: 1248
And in the larger sense, it's a slap in the face to the tradition of COH, which was originally about maneuvering, flanking, and cunning micro and tactics. All you can do is bomb it, or waste a lot of manpower assaulting it.
It lowers the skill cap of the game by its very existence.
It makes skilled players mad because their skill means nothing since any noob can throw up a Bofors and it will take only slightly less time for a top 10 player to get rid of it then another noob.
Posts: 4474
I said capture/destroy hell even decrew but only the Brit can recrew if you don't like it but it would offer some counter play vs brace
If you don't support your emplacements, then you easily lose them anyway, unless its mortar pit sitting in your base.
Do you think we should be able to capture wehr bunkers or OKW trucks?
If not, why do you think its fair to capture opponents combat unit, just because you refuse to bring proper firepower to destroy it?
A pair of StuGs will rip emplacements apart, unless the emplacement in question is 17 pounder.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
I said capture/destroy hell even decrew but only the Brit can recrew if you don't like it but it would offer some counter play vs brace
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 1124
Posts: 4474
Thats still retarded and unfair.like a 70% damage reduction free ability
Posts: 368
And in the larger sense, it's a slap in the face to the tradition of COH, which was originally about maneuvering, flanking, and cunning micro and tactics. All you can do is bomb it, or waste a lot of manpower assaulting it.
It lowers the skill cap of the game by its very existence.
It makes skilled players mad because their skill means nothing since any noob can throw up a Bofors and it will take only slightly less time for a top 10 player to get rid of it then another noob.
Posts: 4474
Alien like technology aka braceweren't you constricted to go ostruppen every game as ost how can you play 2 doc at the same time
A jack of all trades unit, and virtually uncounterable to OH unless commander calls out for a MHT
Able to counter it's counters
Takes down a stuG or p4 health and that's in a vaccume situation. Most brits dont leave emplacements unsupported
On 2v2s it's a problem for most maPs. As if there is any push. Brace holds off enough time for both players to respond.
Katitof suggest 2 stugs to counter.. lol yea 2 stugs counter anything. But consider the fuel cost, and timing till that happens... moron....
I'm taking a dump while I write this at work.
Oh not to mention once a bofers there is a motor pit that usually insta wipes OH infantry. Sorry that I refuse to go spearhead every game...
Posts: 1124
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
like a 70% damage reduction free ability
Posts: 4474
give the emplacement to ost see how the game get balanced and I play Brit more than ost try to kill the emplacement with 2 stug when there is at to support it brace make it inv
I guess you have exactly the same problem with retreat then?
After all, it unfairly makes opponent troops faster and hard to shoot at and therefore hard to kill.
You have no comprehension of why brace is there at all. I bet you never even played brits yourself to actually get a clue on what you're talking about.
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4474
SOmetimes Im amazed why people without a single replay post so much in balance section.I made my suggestion I'm not imposing it to anyone but I get called insane and retard without getting no real reply from the others kat is always there to troll you even on the Churchill post I just buffed the Churchill he is still not happy or giving any opinion
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
I made my suggestion I'm not imposing it to anyone but I get called insane and retard without getting no real reply from the others kat is always there to troll you even on the Churchill post I just buffed the Churchill he is still not happy or giving any opinion
Posts: 1072
Posts: 4474
i said that the Churchill gun is not at t 34-76 lvl and if we buff it we need to cont that in the equation and did I said nerf the gun ?
You'd like to be taken seriously while you are posting video of tiger vs churchill at point blank from 09.2015 and using this as a argument...
Posts: 1072
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
199 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
102 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
25 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
18 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
16 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
43 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
4 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 |