Posts: 673
"Normalized pop-cap on 120 mortar team."
"Fixed an issue with the comet tank projectiles."
Thank god for that, very under rated changes.
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
Posts: 194
so that's this huge patch that relic was talking about? well, good to see cancer emplacement nerf and maxim nerf but that's not much, soviet were underperforming for long time while others were getting buffed, and now they are loosing their last good stuff
Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17
Shock Troop's RG-42 Grenade now damages buildings and does full damage to units inside buildings.
Fixed an issue with the comet tank projectiles.
Posts: 935
Posts: 213
Posts: 1355
Good patch, but sadly not much content. This new war spoils system better be worth the wait. It's taken way too long to get implemented. Also still no word on optimisation? I thought that was on the road map.
Posts: 1124
Posts: 334
Your approach basically assumes that they make arbitrary nerfs or buffs in the first place as if they were in a vacuum. Everything has to be done relative to other units, you don't make something more powerful just for the sake of making it more powerful.
You could, however, argue that the changes to, for example, the 222, were too significant or not warranted at all, but you would need evidence for that, which I assume relic had in order to convince them the changes were needed in the first place. (I'm not saying that I always agree with relic or anything) I don't think anyone would argue that the 222 wasn't underperforming before the changes. Maybe they went a bit overboard and it could use some further adjustment, I'm not sure.
The entire idea of "balancing" is based on making slight changes to that very delicate ratio of cost/performance until the unit fits well relative to other units. There's a reason skilled players will consider spamming maxims but not mg42s.
Posts: 1122
Posts: 721
Posts: 1122
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
Lol, no weapon drop fixes for british inf.
Absolutely murdered maxims (triple nerf relic style, whats next thing would be to make soviets viable, triple penal buff to make them beat stg obers on the move? Maybe commander, which makes them to do so?).
Volks (only infantry OKW needs tbh) untouched.
Fixes seem to be like 1 day of work out of 2 months of waiting.
I give up.
Posts: 181
Maxim Spam? Feels like band-aid.
- There's simply no other alternative for Soviets. Thus, it will be slightly-less efficient Maxim spam.
Posts: 304
*Sexton crews keep crying, smoking and drinking dirty ale from Southampton. QF25 teams already shooting at empty bottles of shitty scotch - can't hit any.*.
Posts: 578
Tigers are still in half of the docs while it should be in a 1 or 2
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Lol wut? Why do you create 'issues' where there are none?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1593 | Subs: 1
As much as I hate to admit it, he actually got half of a point right.
The disparity of IS-2 vs Tiger docs gives ost over twice as much doctrinal freedom in the choice, increasing possible BOs, while not being as doc reliant in the first place.
You could argue for 34/85, but its still a med and you need to pick it if you want to use med that works.
Posts: 232
 |
|
|
47 | ||
|
|
|
|
45 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
861 | ||
 |
|
|
42 | ||
 |
|
|
28 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
