Hotchkiss

Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2016, 15:42 PMHitman5

Yes but Hummel for OKW first please

Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2016, 17:37 PMofield

I would like to see wespe Arty and p3 for ostheer.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2016, 03:29 AMClick

I would rather have Panzer IV infantry tank from vcoh with lock down ability to fuk allies blob.

Jump back to quoted post27 Apr 2016, 03:29 AMClick

I would rather have Panzer IV infantry tank from vcoh with lock down ability to fuk allies blob.

Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2016, 12:25 PMTobis

HotchBUMP

Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2016, 03:19 AMMr. Someguy

A Panzer III would be more thematically appropriate for Ostheer. CoH2 has been sorely lacking a Panzer III since it came out. How did they try to portray the early Wehrmacht without their workhorse of a tank? It's not too late: Vote Panzer III for Wehrmacht Light Armour!

Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2016, 15:56 PMJadek

Panzer III is a medium tank.

Jump back to quoted post2 May 2016, 22:41 PMCrumbum

Why put in a French light tank that didn't much use past the early years of the war in place of the panzer 3 which was widely used by the Wehrmacht on all fronts during the war and upgraded even until late?

Panzer 3 is just the more logical choice I reckon, and Hotchkiss was already in vcoh for the PE which suited the tank much better than OKW would since luchs, puma, flak ht can fill the roles of a Hotchkiss already.

Ostheer on the other hand could benefit more from having a earlier medium tank which can be used as mobile AT, since their only other options are expensive shreck pgrens or call ins such as the puma or stug E. Putting it in t2 with a t3 upgrade requirement would give an earlier AT option rather than immobile paks which sacrifice map control.

Jump back to quoted post3 May 2016, 00:02 AMKamzil118

It's the nostalgia back in the first Company of Heroes. It was a tank which could have the option of having a good anti-vehicle role or it could be a tank that could be a Walking Stuka while it is strong enough to not die at close range.

Jump back to quoted post3 May 2016, 02:57 AMCrumbum

But the AI role is filled by the luchs, the AT by the puma, and the mobile arty by the stuka. Having those combined those combined into one tank would make them obsolete, so what's the point. As a Ost doctrinal call in it might work, but not really otherwise.

Jump back to quoted post3 May 2016, 13:48 PMBasilone

Poll is missing the "no fuck microtransactions/p2w inside a $60 game" option

Jump back to quoted post3 May 2016, 14:13 PMBulgakov

One-off payment for games is going the way of 2D platformers. Used to be a good/the only option but now microtransactions can open up a whole new realm of possibilities for funding and game development.

The less you spend, the less you'll get.

P2W sucks but I'm sure with the right approach, microtransactions can be beneficial to the game. New content = new interest and more $ = more programmer time.

Jump back to quoted post3 May 2016, 15:05 PMBasilone

Agreed microtransactions work fine in War Thunder, MOBAs, and fairly decent in Battlefield (and even old COD/Halo before the "supply drop" bs they have today). COH2 microtransactions are probably the worst in the industry. Overpriced af plus break the game.