Login

russian armor

Enough is enough, fix the volks

PAGES (14)down
23 Dec 2015, 02:40 AM
#201
avatar of Madness

Posts: 33

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Dec 2015, 20:21 PMGenObi


Reason why I used the word "reasonable" and not "out right beat". But that exactly the problem, for me to gain a "advantage"I would need to spend 150 m and 15 fuel + 60 mun at the rate 280mp per rifle, at the cost of 28 to reinforce.

If I "won" a engagement with rifle+bar engagement I will not doubtfuly lose a single model in BEST case scenario, not accounting the lucky instant Rng K.O of a model by shrecks shot and the destruction of cover usually needed by allue squads to remain vaible.

Typically since the only unit that can at engage at long range as allie is the IS, rifle need to close the gap in "mid" range which often results in a lost of a model to get in position. Not only the mp bleed of rifles and IS high, even a "victory" engagement is costly.

NOW all that is FINE since we are going with the whole "Nazi Germany super army" theme that we are fanscinated now a days (which of course comes at the cost of reality).

The problem is to counter infantry play is the usage of vehicles and it becomes a huge problem with you equip a rather cheap squad, tier 1 and most importantly (problem is not the weapon, it's how many available) the spambility of the the weapon with no real downside.

Unlike a popular counter-argument (barely qualifies but it's there) the zook has clear disadvantages, mainly lack of damage (80dmg vs 120 dmg) lack of range and most importantly lack of penetration, which is key.

As it stands there is no real reason to build any other type of unit the volks + armor vehicles your choice due to cost per effect meta. Not they are "great" (unless your referring to super volks of days past) But cost effective...

Thus the superman comment, lack of any real down side, cheap, available early and reasonably effect all target types seems super to me...



This!
23 Dec 2015, 02:44 AM
#202
avatar of Madness

Posts: 33

I've given up! It is long time since i last cared about a RTS, but seriously this community. Relic shouldn't look to us for balance. It is clear that CoH got one of the most Biased player groups to either side. It is fucking sickining and i don't think anything can be done about it. As long as people keep deviding themselves up in only axis or allies players and refuse to try playing as the other side there won't be anything to gain. Ost has some problem so does okw so does every fucking faction but the way people often present it. makes it nonconstructive

23 Dec 2015, 04:12 AM
#203
avatar of Storm267

Posts: 128

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 02:44 AMMadness
I've given up! It is long time since i last cared about a RTS, but seriously this community. Relic shouldn't look to us for balance. It is clear that CoH got one of the most Biased player groups to either side. It is fucking sickining and i don't think anything can be done about it. As long as people keep deviding themselves up in only axis or allies players and refuse to try playing as the other side there won't be anything to gain. Ost has some problem so does okw so does every fucking faction but the way people often present it. makes it nonconstructive




:clap: good summary of the issue on here and on the official forums. There is about a 3:1 volk complaint to rifle complaint ratio. Truth be told both have the very similar issues.
23 Dec 2015, 05:53 AM
#204
avatar of GenObi

Posts: 556

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 01:34 AMZeaviS


Well not exactly. Baring the RNG of schreks, riles beat volks without upgrades at all ranges, assuming equals levels of vet and even more so when rifles are vet3. Bars and lmgs just make it even more favorable. I'd be more than happy to test this out with you if you wish.

The counter argument with zooks is fair because you can buy 2 for 100 munition, where a single schrek costs 90. So while the pen is less, you're doing 160 damage vs 120 and they fire faster, and they are on a squad that is more durable.


well your wrong, but i like your attempt to reason it
23 Dec 2015, 06:33 AM
#205
avatar of The_Courier

Posts: 665

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 01:34 AMZeaviS


Well not exactly. Baring the RNG of schreks, riles beat volks without upgrades at all ranges, assuming equals levels of vet and even more so when rifles are vet3. Bars and lmgs just make it even more favorable. I'd be more than happy to test this out with you if you wish.

The counter argument with zooks is fair because you can buy 2 for 100 munition, where a single schrek costs 90. So while the pen is less, you're doing 160 damage vs 120 and they fire faster, and they are on a squad that is more durable.


That's in theory.

In practice, the zook's pen is so shit that even against P4 it has trouble penetrating front armor (that's before vet and stacked bulletins). Anything Panther or bigger can safely ignore all but an entire blobful of zooks. Shrecks easily pen all but the very heaviest ally armor (IS-2, Churchill) on the front quite easily. Higher damage means little if you can't actually penetrate and use it.

2 zooks also sink a squad's DPS more than 1 zook or 1 shreck, so a rifle squad with 2 zooks will have mediocre DPS even at vet 3 against infantry. Wouldn't be surprised if vet 5 Volks with shrecks win vs vet 3 rifles with dual zooks.

And zooks are on one allied faction, behind an unlock. Soviets make do with PTRS which is doctrinal and sucks against anything but 222s, and british has the PIATs which you have to actively micro so they hit the broad side of a King Tiger, and even then it's a coin flip. Ostheer gets shrecks on a 340 MP 4 man tier 2 squad in an upgrade that changes their role dramatically, so that's very fine. OKW gets shrecks on their 250 MP 5 man mainline infantry and it's not even locked behind tech so there's no reason not to have every Volk squad with one as soon as you get the muni. It's not a role change, it is a straigth upgrade that allows Volks to be the most versatile infantry in the game, even more than Guards whose entire thing is to be versatile.

Handheld AT weapons are not balanced except by cost, and not very well at that. Perhaps by design, Shrecks are better than allied options in 90% of situations. There's a very good reason shreck blobs are a thing, while PTRS and PIAT blobs are never seen and zook blobs only work against bad players. The panzershreck is uncontestably the king of handheld AT. As such, it should be a specialized weapon with drawbacks. The Ostheer shreck acts like that. The OKW shreck doesn't.
23 Dec 2015, 06:39 AM
#206
avatar of stalinqtxoxo420mlg

Posts: 54

Volks themselves aren't the real problem, it's the dumb scaling and safe transition massing them gives you.

You can't mass conscripts without seriously crippling your timing on vehicles, and they need upgrades to be researched, chewing away at ~3min worth of manpower income alone away from your other tech.

Volks upgrades are all unlocked for free as part of the standard tech path, so you can freely invest all your MP without worrying about being punished for it. If you build 5+ Cons as Soviets and lose the early engagement, your game is basically done - if you build 5+ Volks and lose the early engagement, it's fine because Allies can't punish you much if you pull back and camp on your gas with schrecks/flak HQ.

OKW tech needs to be delayed substantially - if their early game is going to be buffed to Soviet levels, their mid/late game shouldn't be as easily accessible as it is.
23 Dec 2015, 15:56 PM
#207
avatar of whitesky00

Posts: 468

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 02:00 AMRappy

This!


Axis fanboi alert!

i'll gladly trade 2 zooks for 1 panzershrek.
OKW can build 2 zooks with 100 muni and USF can get 1 shrek with 90 muni.
Trade agreed!

I guarantee that Axis will cry if this is implemented.
23 Dec 2015, 17:39 PM
#208
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070



Axis fanboi alert!

i'll gladly trade 2 zooks for 1 panzershrek.
OKW can build 2 zooks with 100 muni and USF can get 1 shrek with 90 muni.
Trade agreed!

I guarantee that Axis will cry if this is implemented.


of course man. axis players want all the benefits Allied factions have but cry when Allied players want some of the Axis abilities.
23 Dec 2015, 17:49 PM
#209
avatar of Australian Magic

Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

When I see schreck blob running agasint my Sherman, KV or IS, Im a bit scared.
When I see bazooka blob running agasint my Pz4, Panther or Tiger, I laugh.
23 Dec 2015, 21:33 PM
#210
avatar of Glorious_kvasius

Posts: 20

And... What if you see a PIAT blob?

I tried it for a couple of times... and it actually kinda works.
If your inf is somewhat vetted and you have like... 6-8 PIAT's,(2 squads with 2piat's, 2 squads with piat+bren) you will kill the enemy tanks most of the time (as long as they dont try to ram your inf/run from you... as long as they're somewhat static). MP bleed would be a bit harsh (150-200 MP), but #worthit for me.

Maybe I was just lucky enough.

And volks need to be changed. Somehow. Because 5 vet system + schreck + decent AI capabilities make them a bit too strong. Only slight adjustments here will do. (Or cutting them up into 2 individual squads, but I dont see it as a real way either)
23 Dec 2015, 21:40 PM
#211
avatar of whitesky00

Posts: 468

UKF has heavy MP bleed. 26/28 reinforce with 4 model squads? Sure they work great if they hit a static target. I always use attack ground. artillery of any type is pretty devastating against it. and it's not an easy right-click and auto-aim/snipe AT shot. If you spend that much munitions on piat... how will you stop volk, ober, fallschim, fus infantry blob? UKF doesn't have any viable counter blob artillery.
23 Dec 2015, 22:17 PM
#212
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

The main problem I face in 1v1 with USF vs OKW is that OKW just get too many 'bonuses'. By bonuses I mean things like free flame nade unlock with tech. The OKW have many of these.
- Bonus starting manpower
- AT gun and light vehicle in T0
- Free medics, repair station, and cut-off/fuel protector as part of tech
- Free flame nades as part of tech
- Free Panzerschreck upgrade as part of tech
- Extra vet

These were fine when OKW still had a resource penalty, but now they are just too much. On top of this OKW has a very fast light tank rush with very large shock value. USF just can't deal with this.
23 Dec 2015, 22:31 PM
#213
avatar of ruzen
Patrion 15

Posts: 243

oh my people are so focus on other factions that dont see their "favorite" faction stong points. :facepalm:
23 Dec 2015, 23:15 PM
#214
avatar of ZeaviS

Posts: 160

jump backJump back to quoted post23 Dec 2015, 05:53 AMGenObi


well your wrong, but i like your attempt to reason it


Care to elaborate? I'm more than happy to hop on a game with you and test if you wish.
24 Dec 2015, 06:26 AM
#215
avatar of ZeaviS

Posts: 160



That's in theory.

In practice, the zook's pen is so shit that even against P4 it has trouble penetrating front armor (that's before vet and stacked bulletins). Anything Panther or bigger can safely ignore all but an entire blobful of zooks. Shrecks easily pen all but the very heaviest ally armor (IS-2, Churchill) on the front quite easily. Higher damage means little if you can't actually penetrate and use it.

2 zooks also sink a squad's DPS more than 1 zook or 1 shreck, so a rifle squad with 2 zooks will have mediocre DPS even at vet 3 against infantry. Wouldn't be surprised if vet 5 Volks with shrecks win vs vet 3 rifles with dual zooks.

And zooks are on one allied faction, behind an unlock. Soviets make do with PTRS which is doctrinal and sucks against anything but 222s, and british has the PIATs which you have to actively micro so they hit the broad side of a King Tiger, and even then it's a coin flip. Ostheer gets shrecks on a 340 MP 4 man tier 2 squad in an upgrade that changes their role dramatically, so that's very fine. OKW gets shrecks on their 250 MP 5 man mainline infantry and it's not even locked behind tech so there's no reason not to have every Volk squad with one as soon as you get the muni. It's not a role change, it is a straigth upgrade that allows Volks to be the most versatile infantry in the game, even more than Guards whose entire thing is to be versatile.

Handheld AT weapons are not balanced except by cost, and not very well at that. Perhaps by design, Shrecks are better than allied options in 90% of situations. There's a very good reason shreck blobs are a thing, while PTRS and PIAT blobs are never seen and zook blobs only work against bad players. The panzershreck is uncontestably the king of handheld AT. As such, it should be a specialized weapon with drawbacks. The Ostheer shreck acts like that. The OKW shreck doesn't.



In theory and in practice. I can show you videos of 2 double zook riflemen killing an okw p4 just as quickly as 2 schrek volks. It works. Not to mention rifles have a snare.

The point is really that, when volks have schreks, their AI isn't that great, so that's your opportunity to win infantry engagements. I testws double zook riflemen against a schrek volk and they lose at long range but win more often than they lose at mid range, I have video proof. Now imagine double bar vet 3 riflemen against volks, they maybe lose a model in that engagement. Same with IS with double brens, even vet 3 cons, etc.

Like I said, before, more than happy to hop in a game and test this with anyone. I'll admit I'm wrong if you can show me. I even have some video of some of these matchups I tried in the cheatmod.
24 Dec 2015, 06:58 AM
#216
avatar of Iron Emperor

Posts: 1653

The main problem I face in 1v1 with USF vs OKW is that OKW just get too many 'bonuses'. By bonuses I mean things like free flame nade unlock with tech. The OKW have many of these.
- Bonus starting manpower
- AT gun and light vehicle in T0
- Free medics, repair station, and cut-off/fuel protector as part of tech
- Free flame nades as part of tech
- Free Panzerschreck upgrade as part of tech
- Extra vet

These were fine when OKW still had a resource penalty, but now they are just too much. On top of this OKW has a very fast light tank rush with very large shock value. USF just can't deal with this.


A well micro'd AAHT can keep you away from them also, no luch needed.
24 Dec 2015, 07:52 AM
#217
avatar of Hiflex

Posts: 43



That's in theory.

In practice, the zook's pen is so shit that even against P4 it has trouble penetrating front armor (that's before vet and stacked bulletins). Anything Panther or bigger can safely ignore all but an entire blobful of zooks. Shrecks easily pen all but the very heaviest ally armor (IS-2, Churchill) on the front quite easily. Higher damage means little if you can't actually penetrate and use it.

2 zooks also sink a squad's DPS more than 1 zook or 1 shreck, so a rifle squad with 2 zooks will have mediocre DPS even at vet 3 against infantry. Wouldn't be surprised if vet 5 Volks with shrecks win vs vet 3 rifles with dual zooks.

And zooks are on one allied faction, behind an unlock. Soviets make do with PTRS which is doctrinal and sucks against anything but 222s, and british has the PIATs which you have to actively micro so they hit the broad side of a King Tiger, and even then it's a coin flip. Ostheer gets shrecks on a 340 MP 4 man tier 2 squad in an upgrade that changes their role dramatically, so that's very fine. OKW gets shrecks on their 250 MP 5 man mainline infantry and it's not even locked behind tech so there's no reason not to have every Volk squad with one as soon as you get the muni. It's not a role change, it is a straigth upgrade that allows Volks to be the most versatile infantry in the game, even more than Guards whose entire thing is to be versatile.

Handheld AT weapons are not balanced except by cost, and not very well at that. Perhaps by design, Shrecks are better than allied options in 90% of situations. There's a very good reason shreck blobs are a thing, while PTRS and PIAT blobs are never seen and zook blobs only work against bad players. The panzershreck is uncontestably the king of handheld AT. As such, it should be a specialized weapon with drawbacks. The Ostheer shreck acts like that. The OKW shreck doesn't.

Bullshit. There is a Video from Cpt price where a kt drove into a blob of zooks. It didnt survived the second volley
Please dont write you own, twisted, opinion, down and try to fake them as facts. Since the patch okw has a less winrate then the average on the chartsite in 1v1 and 2v2. And 1v1 should be all we looking at in terms of balance (esl).
24 Dec 2015, 09:23 AM
#218
avatar of wongtp

Posts: 647

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Dec 2015, 07:52 AMHiflex

Bullshit. There is a Video from Cpt price where a kt drove into a blob of zooks. It didnt survived the second volley
Please dont write you own, twisted, opinion, down and try to fake them as facts. Since the patch okw has a less winrate then the average on the chartsite in 1v1 and 2v2. And 1v1 should be all we looking at in terms of balance (esl).


so u saying a kt with 1280hp needing 16 penetrating zooka hits to destroy it was killed in 2 volley?

to pen, a zooka has 110 at far and 130 at near of pen value vs a frontal armour of 375. that means a zooka has 29% chance to pen from the front from far and 34.6% up close, so you are saying there were 55/46 zooka shots fired in 2 volleys?

or a more plasusible scenario would be rear armour hits. up close its 130/225, a cool 57% chance to pen. so there was at least 28 shots fired in 2 volleys?

was rng involved? or was the KT already heavily damaged?
24 Dec 2015, 12:51 PM
#219
avatar of ausownage

Posts: 117

I love the fact Blizzard actually supports their games and and make speedy/intelligent balance choices.

You'll never see that in Relic. Then again, they don't have a 200k playerbase / $4billion net worth.
24 Dec 2015, 13:14 PM
#220
avatar of the_onion_man
Patrion 14

Posts: 117

1) Zooks are actually pretty good at least since the December patch (there was a stretch where I didn't play much so I can't say exactly when they started being good). But yes I have lost or nearly lost several PIVs to zooks, thinking they were the same peashooters as before. Not the case. Seriously if you haven't played with zooks in a while, try them. You will be pleasantly surprised.

2) I agree with the general thrust of the complaints about volks. However, allied infantry spam is *AT LEAST* as frustrating, the only reason it isn't a complete disaster is because yes, there is more of a tradeoff between AI and AT. Luchs is decent but won't really shut down blobs as long as there is any AT in the vicinity (or vehicle snares). Stuka zu Fuss is literally hit-and-miss, doesn't suppress, takes a while to cool down, etc. AAHT actually works fairly well, but it costs a decent amount of fuel, is fragile, and requires T1.

3) So what I would say is volks can and should lose schrecks, but *ONLY* if OKW gets a decent nondoctrinal MG to deal with Allied infantry blobs, especially in the early game. Maybe the MG34 is fine, just buff its suppression a bit and raise its cost to, say, 240.

4) I support the creation of a dedicated "Tank Buster" type squad to carry schrecks, but am open to other ideas.
PAGES (14)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
Last Wednesday, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
Last Wednesday, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
Last Wednesday, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
13 Mar 2025, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
13 Mar 2025, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: I am just saddened how Relic keeps hurting themselves by not fixing 5 minute things like menus. Why anger users with stuff that could be fixed in minutes???
13 Mar 2025, 19:50 PM
Rosbone: I was wondering why people think I was raging. I think it was when I said "because coh3 sucks so bad". That was not my opinion. Just a general feel from top players/streamers. I dont play Coh3 and have NO opinion of it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:48 PM
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
12 Mar 2025, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
12 Mar 2025, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
12 Mar 2025, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
12 Mar 2025, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
12 Mar 2025, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
12 Mar 2025, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
12 Mar 2025, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
12 Mar 2025, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
07 Mar 2025, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
06 Mar 2025, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
06 Mar 2025, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
06 Mar 2025, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
06 Mar 2025, 10:49 AM
Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
06 Mar 2025, 03:20 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. :rofl:
05 Mar 2025, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

255 users are online: 255 guests
0 post in the last 24h
3 posts in the last week
54 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53584
Welcome our newest member, Spellsy
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM