Login

russian armor

Rear echelons shouldn't be able to pick up any base upgrades

DeC
14 Sep 2015, 10:55 AM
#1
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

Just watched a live game and witnessed some cheesy comdey (sprice), REs with double bars wiping out falls, obers. Imagine how broken it would become if ostruppen were allowed to upgrade to lmg34/stg44.


Reduce their cost but change their 'pickup-slot' number to 0.
14 Sep 2015, 10:58 AM
#2
14 Sep 2015, 10:59 AM
#3
avatar of Bad_Vader

Posts: 88 | Subs: 1

Ah...NO
That's like complaining that a blob of PG shreks can kill Allied tanks way too fast.
14 Sep 2015, 11:00 AM
#4
avatar of TheMux2

Posts: 139

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 10:55 AMDeC
Just watched a live game and witnessed some cheesy comdey (sprice), REs with double bars wiping out falls, obers. Imagine how broken it would become if ostruppen were allowed to upgrade to lmg34/stg44.


Reduce their cost but change their 'pickup-slot' number to 0.


L2P rear echelon are fine. Dont gimp USF even more
14 Sep 2015, 11:05 AM
#5
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

100 mp res lol
14 Sep 2015, 11:10 AM
#6
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

That's not a good fix because it limits other plays. What could be done instead is increase their upkeep or reinforcement cost so that they can't take 10 casualties every fight and still float 1000 manpower. Alternatively, they could just make it so that BAR / M1919 are less effective on them.
DeC
14 Sep 2015, 11:29 AM
#7
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:00 AMTheMux2


Dont gimp USF even more
The recent "USHF woe is me" attitude does not justify this exploit.
14 Sep 2015, 11:46 AM
#10
avatar of CaptainSPrice

Posts: 182 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
Dec you should know USF is underperforming with manpower income and Rifflemans eating too much manpower to reinforce - i just change tactic to become for me --- better economy and effective Kappa
14 Sep 2015, 11:48 AM
#11
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:29 AMDeC
The recent "USHF woe is me" attitude does not justify this exploit.


"Exploit" is not "someone doing something I don't like"
DeC
14 Sep 2015, 11:53 AM
#12
avatar of DeC

Posts: 102

@SpRice; Yo no offense man. I am not criticizing your play style. But form what I observed it was not alright. In general ,cheap ass units using potent upgrades is not fine.
14 Sep 2015, 12:09 PM
#13
avatar of Trubbbel

Posts: 721

I don't see anything wrong with it at all. It's good echelons have a way to stay in the game. They are still weak although bars are good.
14 Sep 2015, 13:10 PM
#14
avatar of RMMLz

Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

USF is boring as hell, you are gonna limit them even more? RETs are fine, and their vet which gives them accuracy is also fine. USF needs more options not less.

They also don't have any combat utility (Nade, smoke etc) and a single MG will pin them down.
14 Sep 2015, 13:10 PM
#15
avatar of Nabarxos

Posts: 392

nerf Rear echelons.......

HA HA HA

whats next??
14 Sep 2015, 13:33 PM
#16
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

this is almost as obvious as bait can get
14 Sep 2015, 13:48 PM
#17
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:53 AMDeC
@SpRice; Yo no offense man. I am not criticizing your play style. But form what I observed it was not alright. In general ,cheap ass units using potent upgrades is not fine.

How about shreks on volks? Volks are cheap and shreks are potent upgrade, very potent. Or double standards again?
14 Sep 2015, 14:17 PM
#18
avatar of Pedro_Jedi

Posts: 543

Using RE's as mainline infatry is a nice strategy. It allows a lot of manpower that can be used for cashes, FP's, weapon upgrades and other stuff. It's used by many a good player, specially to take the enemy by surprise - it too allows unprecedented capping power. Considering USF's prodigal weakness to late game, I think it's OK. It's better than vehicles crew's exploit, at least. :)
14 Sep 2015, 14:22 PM
#19
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885


jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 11:53 AMDeC
@SpRice; Yo no offense man. I am not criticizing your play style. But form what I observed it was not alright. In general ,cheap ass units using potent upgrades is not fine.



jump backJump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 13:48 PMnewvan

How about shreks on volks? Volks are cheap and shreks are potent upgrade, very potent. Or double standards again?


Grens are also prety cheap, accessible and have such a powerfull upgrade that players build them even one hour into the game Kappa
14 Sep 2015, 14:26 PM
#20
avatar of kamk
Donator 11

Posts: 764

this is almost as obvious as bait can get

^ sums it up.

Nothing good will come from a troll topic.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
Today, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
Today, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
Today, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

458 users are online: 458 guests
0 post in the last 24h
6 posts in the last week
69 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53448
Welcome our newest member, Champ301
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM