Posts: 167
Permanently Banned
I thought I'm the only one. For me, it happened only in 1 game as Ostheer. One of my MGs would not automatically fire and I had to order it to attack enemy units in its arc of fire. Same with the buildings.
I am realistic and thoughtful.
You're the one who is blind to that, ignoring overpowering synergy that would create for ost, imbalancing completely their tiering and tech pace.
4 
Posts: 1006
I thought I'm the only one. For me, it happened only in 1 game as Ostheer. One of my MGs would not automatically fire and I had to order it to attack enemy units in its arc of fire. Same with the buildings.
/ \
/
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Can the USF lmg's be made 60 muni in stead of 70 now that abuse stance is removed?
And since it deals less damage then all other lmg's when using a single one, can you make it so the USF lmg's can shoot on the move like paratrooper ones? It'll encourage flanking/mobility, which is USF design.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 403
You don't know the horror...
Croc is so ridiculous. PaK wall won't do jack shit since it wipes them in 2 seconds. It also gains vet quit fast, and that Vet3...
One Croc and an ATG, and they can push any line. Mediums also are not that effective, because even if you flank them, and even if every single shot penetrates (which they won't) it's gonna take for ever to finish it off, and in the mean time it will wipe your vetted MGs and PAK with its deathray.
In 2s, the only counter is Elefant.
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Pakwall is shit if you are bad and don't spot for your stunning AT guns. Next time try to actually spread your units since I see you still have blob habits.
Posts: 2819
You're sorry for the 45 minute delay? HAH! Oh how times have changed, you guys are awesome. We all love this. Keep it up!
Posts: 83
There basically LMG42's you can give to any of your squads, so no.
Posts: 211
I disagree, this game throws history out the window and with all the goofy, rare vehicles we already have in game, one grenade change shouldn't "ruin" the experience. If it does then your knowledge of WWII is questionable. I won't argue against putting the Incin-nade on Sturms as then they make better assault infantry and getting a second one at the start of the game is more feasible. I will argue against all "Historical Accuracy" arguments.
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
If you played more than one match, you would understand that it's not "basically LMG42's". LMG42 is better than it by far (without the defensive stance). Given to any troops is the counter weight you're basically saying??? THERE IS ONLY ONE TROOP to pick from as allies. Unless you are referring to the RE's lol.
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
I understand that the atmosphere created by the game is rather aiming for a cinematic experience, and not for a total simulation. A simulation would be less interesting, probablly.
However, there is things that are recognized by many. People who do not know such details as the production numbers of certain vehicles will stil recognize iconic items such as the german steel helmet, the typical american 'pineapple' grenades or... the german 'Stielhandgrenade'.
And that is my point. Of course, there is 'goofy, rare' vehicles - but many people wouldn't even recognize them as such, I suppose. It is about generating a cinematic ww2 experience, not a simulation. And there, the Stielhandgrenade actually helps as it is associated with ww2 by many. I would also dislike it if the regular grenade was removed from US Riflemen or UK Infantry Sections. They need such iconic items.
This is only my opinion of course.
Posts: 4928
If you played more than one match, you would understand that it's not "basically LMG42's". LMG42 is better than it by far (without the defensive stance). Given to any troops is the counter weight you're basically saying??? THERE IS ONLY ONE TROOP to pick from as allies. Unless you are referring to the RE's lol.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
8 Posts: 2470
Posts: 254
youre right man. i play coh2 for the cinematic ww2 experience and the stielhandgranaten
8 Posts: 2470
You may be sarcastic here but you are definitely playing CoH2 for the WW2 feel and the complexity provided by the gameplay. If you'd want to play for competition alone, you would choose a game without RNG and with mirrored maps and/or factions.
Posts: 4928
which would all seem to support lowering the cost on the 1919 as no other weapon charges extra so you can equip any squad with it.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 1891
Er, no. 10 Munitions is the price of being able to double up or equip universally.
4 Posts: 444
There basically LMG42's you can give to any of your squads, so no.
 | Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 4928
So let's see, rifleman are more expensive and need to spend 140 muni to beat Grens.
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
4 Posts: 444
Riflemen are getting a huge buff next patch.
| Playercard of Looney | |||||||||||||||||||
|
 |
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
