Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I dont know what to think, LEHF is very viable this patch, and ostheer turbo mortar has always been. If you buff panzerwerfer too much it would make ostheer indirect fire op?
9 
Posts: 102
LEFH is not viable, ML-20 will become as shitty as LEFH. Just because ML got nerfed does not mean that LEFH is fine. They will both suck after this patch.
And who said anything about buffing Pzwerfer "too much"?
Posts: 118
Can't just move the werfer to t3 without changing anything else, you make t3 even stronger and t4 even worse.
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I disagree, the LeFH is solid. It's just overshadowed by a laughably strong ML-20. Anyway, I'd much rather artillery be bad than OP.
Posts: 38
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Posts: 4928
all you filthy hotchkiss lovers need to l2p #TeamPanzerIII
Posts: 1891
Posts: 770
Posts: 80
i never go for tanks so arty party confirmed at 12 min 
8 Posts: 2470
Posts: 509
Posts: 509
Werfee should be buffed but turbomortar should also be nerfed. Giving ost ridiculous nondoc indirect + sniper will really hurt the Brits, and to a lesser extent usf.
Posts: 509
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
How about:
1) Increase rockets fired to 16 like it used to be but keep the dmg profile as is now. Don't touch reload. (used to do 160 dmg, now 80)
AND
2) Move to HQ, unlock at BP3. That way ost won't starve due to having no late game arty if going t3 and keep the werfer at a reasonable fuel gate
Posts: 509
1 Posts: 412
Posts: 509
Posts: 509
You can't move it to T3 without making massive changes, like moving the PIV to T4 or something equally as dumb.
It performs fine. It is an RNG machine like all rocket artillery, unless you move it in close (which is the same for Katyusha. It is obviously meant to be used close since it can take 2 shots and still live, and it it is cheaper.
 |
|
|
42 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
68 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
