Login

russian armor

T-34 needs a buff

PAGES (20)down
12 Jun 2015, 22:16 PM
#321
avatar of Zyllen

Posts: 770



Being 10 fuel cheaper isn't an excuse for being totally inferior in every way.


Actually its a pretty valid excuse. And their is also the issue that the usf has no heavies or 85's or decent AT guns so they need to draw their strength from somewhere else. the t-34 is weaker because it is meant to be weaker. Asymmetrical balance we call that


And if you dont agree then convince me why the soviets need a stronger stock medium tank. And just comparing stats with other medium tanks isnt valid. you need to look at the shole faction.
12 Jun 2015, 22:54 PM
#322
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 22:16 PMZyllen


Actually its a pretty valid excuse. And their is also the issue that the usf has no heavies or 85's or decent AT guns so they need to draw their strength from somewhere else. the t-34 is weaker because it is meant to be weaker. Asymmetrical balance we call that


And if you dont agree then convince me why the soviets need a stronger stock medium tank. And just comparing stats with other medium tanks isnt valid. you need to look at the shole faction.


And what is your excuse for SU-76?
Sorry, but that isn't asymmetrical balance here, thats bullshit argument.

If the price of the tank prevents overcoming your opponents much stronger tanks with numbers, then its not asymmetrical balance, its bad balance, no matter how you try to look at it.
12 Jun 2015, 22:59 PM
#323
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 22:16 PMZyllen


Actually its a pretty valid excuse. And their is also the issue that the usf has no heavies or 85's or decent AT guns so they need to draw their strength from somewhere else. the t-34 is weaker because it is meant to be weaker. Asymmetrical balance we call that


And if you dont agree then convince me why the soviets need a stronger stock medium tank. And just comparing stats with other medium tanks isnt valid. you need to look at the shole faction.


So what units do the US players have that can take damage like Tigers, Panthers, Elefants, JT's, KT's, Mr Asymmetrical Balance?

Moving the T34 to Tier 4 with its present stats will just ensure that nobody builds them.
12 Jun 2015, 23:33 PM
#324
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Jun 2015, 22:16 PMZyllen


Actually its a pretty valid excuse. And their is also the issue that the usf has no heavies or 85's or decent AT guns so they need to draw their strength from somewhere else. the t-34 is weaker because it is meant to be weaker. Asymmetrical balance we call that


And if you dont agree then convince me why the soviets need a stronger stock medium tank. And just comparing stats with other medium tanks isnt valid. you need to look at the shole faction.


I have already explained it to you. Soviets need a stronger stock tank because the t34 is literally the best tank the soviets get for the entire game. Not only that, but it is the entire late game of soviet t3. If soviets are to be expected to survive without callins (which is what everyone wants), the first step will be giving them a late game worth etching for.

Currently, the t34 is the weakest tank, but it cannot gain a numbers advantage due to its cost. For the price of 4 p4s, you can get 5 t34s, and the 4 p4s will be dealing more ai and at damage, while simultaneously also scaling better in future engagements thanks to the significant vet 2 armor buff. On top of that, ostheer has the option to tech to t4, for more powerful, well armored, specialised units, while a soviet must spend more fuel to tech to their t4, which gives acess to the defensive su85 and the defensive katyusha. Soviet t3 +t4 has no breakthrough unit that can tank blows. The t34 needs to be more spammable, or it needs to scale better in some way, or soviets will have no chance without callins.

Also, the 100 fu cost does not justify it's current performance, as outlined above. Its simply not cheap enough. I could make obers cost 600 mp, and they will still be the most powerful long range infantry, but they would still be cost ineffective.
13 Jun 2015, 00:16 AM
#325
avatar of CookiezNcreem
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15



I have already explained it to you. Soviets need a stronger stock tank because the t34 is literally the best tank the soviets get for the entire game. Not only that, but it is the entire late game of soviet t3. If soviets are to be expected to survive without callins (which is what everyone wants), the first step will be giving them a late game worth etching for.

Currently, the t34 is the weakest tank, but it cannot gain a numbers advantage due to its cost. For the price of 4 p4s, you can get 5 t34s, and the 4 p4s will be dealing more ai and at damage, while simultaneously also scaling better in future engagements thanks to the significant vet 2 armor buff. On top of that, ostheer has the option to tech to t4, for more powerful, well armored, specialised units, while a soviet must spend more fuel to tech to their t4, which gives acess to the defensive su85 and the defensive katyusha. Soviet t3 +t4 has no breakthrough unit that can tank blows. The t34 needs to be more spammable, or it needs to scale better in some way, or soviets will have no chance without callins.

Also, the 100 fu cost does not justify it's current performance, as outlined above. Its simply not cheap enough. I could make obers cost 600 mp, and they will still be the most powerful long range infantry, but they would still be cost ineffective.



HMM commash..
im all for a slight t3476 veterancy buff +cost buffso it can actually duke it out with panzer 4s once vetted :foreveralone:
But let's be real :foreveralone:

Callins themselves will never go anywhere, they will always have a late game if you so choose.
The the T3485,KV1,Is2,ISU, ETC will STILL BE IN THE GAME duking it out with German steel in the late game :foreveralone:

EXCEPT HOPEFULLY :foreveralone: You won't be able to simply spam these good tonks and stay at t0>t2. That's what everyone hates :foreveralone:

You'll simply have to tech to the callinz :foreveralone: and make your late game better.
Just like Prosteer will hopefully have to do with their big cats, hopefully :foreveralone:


Now this doesn't solve the issue of doctrines like reserve army not having a call in tank and therefore no late game worth a crap,because like you and others are saying the best tank the soviets have outside of "meta" doctrines is the t3476 :foreveralone: and the only way to allow it to scale is going t3 t4 which is impossible CURRENTLY :foreveralone:
the only real solution outside buffing the t34 to unreal levels :foreveralone:

Is If they made a certain up gunned medium tank stock for all doctrines, and left other callinz to their specific doctrines.... :foreveralone:


13 Jun 2015, 00:23 AM
#326
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958




HMM commash..
im all for a slight t3476 veterancy buff +cost buffso it can actually duke it out with panzer 4s once vetted :foreveralone:
But let's be real :foreveralone:

Callins themselves will never go anywhere, they will always have a late game if you so choose.
The the T3485,KV1,Is2,ISU, ETC will STILL BE IN THE GAME duking it out with German steel in the late game :foreveralone:

EXCEPT HOPEFULLY :foreveralone: You won't be able to simply spam these good tonks and stay at t0>t2. That's what everyone hates :foreveralone:

You'll simply have to tech to the callinz :foreveralone: and make your late game better.
Just like Prosteer will hopefully have to do with their big cats, hopefully :foreveralone:


Now this doesn't solve the issue of doctrines like reserve army not having a call in tank and therefore no late game worth a crap,because like you and others are saying the best tank the soviets have outside of "meta" doctrines is the t3476 :foreveralone: and the only way to allow it to scale is going t3 t4 which is impossible CURRENTLY :foreveralone:
the only real solution outside buffing the t34 to unreal levels :foreveralone:

Is If they made a certain up gunned medium tank stock for all doctrines, and left other callinz to their specific doctrines.... :foreveralone:




Or Relic could just make the T34/85 the standard T4 tank, and make the T34/76 into the call-in, with a low cp value so it still has some shock value. WFA was supposed to be late war and the standard Soviet tank was the T34/85 by then.
13 Jun 2015, 00:27 AM
#327
avatar of Zyllen

Posts: 770



I have already explained it to you. Soviets need a stronger stock tank because the t34 is literally the best tank the soviets get for the entire game. Not only that, but it is the entire late game of soviet t3. If soviets are to be expected to survive without callins (which is what everyone wants), the first step will be giving them a late game worth etching for.


Why do you blatantly ignore the fact that soviets have better call ins compared to the usf?
Yes they have somewhat weaker stock then the usf. They have far better callins and this will not change even with the changes made in the alpha. i see no reason for buffing the t-34



Currently, the t34 is the weakest tank, but it cannot gain a numbers advantage due to its cost. For the price of 4 p4s, you can get 5 t34s, and the 4 p4s will be dealing more ai and at damage, while simultaneously also scaling better in future engagements thanks to the significant vet 2 armor buff. On top of that, ostheer has the option to tech to t4, for more powerful, well armored, specialised units, while a soviet must spend more fuel to tech to their t4, which gives acess to the defensive su85 and the defensive katyusha. Soviet t3 +t4 has no breakthrough unit that can tank blows. The t34 needs to be more spammable, or it needs to scale better in some way, or soviets will have no chance without callins.


Mate this is the argument i do not wish to hear. And you basically invalided your entire argument.The t-34 is not meant to be spammed its meant to be used in conjunction with the TD's or AI tanks. You can spam 5 t-34's all you want its not going to change the fact that 1 p4 with 2 stugs is going to nail 5 t-34's to the wall. same goes for 5 p4's and 1 t-34 and 2 su85's.
But at the moment its difficult to get a t-34 and 2 su85's



Also, the 100 fu cost does not justify it's current performance, as outlined above. Its simply not cheap enough. I could make obers cost 600 mp, and they will still be the most powerful long range infantry, but they would still be cost ineffective.


The stats between the p4 and the t-34 is not as colossal as you make it out to be. 150 vs 180 armour and 20% less dps for the the t-34. that's why pay more for the p4. And while the mg does aid the p4 with AI its not free.
13 Jun 2015, 00:29 AM
#328
avatar of Zyllen

Posts: 770

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2015, 00:23 AMGrumpy


Or Relic could just make the T34/85 the standard T4 tank, and make the T34/76 into the call-in, with a low cp value so it still has some shock value. WFA was supposed to be late war and the standard Soviet tank was the T34/85 by then.


is their a reason why the 85 should be there?
13 Jun 2015, 00:35 AM
#329
avatar of 1[][]

Posts: 172



Yeah, I want to see thousands of T-34s ramming a Panther and destroying it only via ram damage :snfBarton:



Eh, I don't care. Player's fault for getting a panther instead of another PIV or some paks :megusta:
13 Jun 2015, 01:26 AM
#330
avatar of The_rEd_bEar

Posts: 760

Why is everyone arguing with zyllen? Its useless he thinks he's right and refuses to listens to any ones point of view,you're literally talking to a brick wall
13 Jun 2015, 01:33 AM
#331
avatar of comm_ash
Patrion 14

Posts: 1194 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2015, 00:27 AMZyllen


Why do you blatantly ignore the fact that soviets have better call ins compared to the usf?
Yes they have somewhat weaker stock then the usf. They have far better callins and this will not change even with the changes made in the alpha. i see no reason for buffing the t-34



Mate this is the argument i do not wish to hear. And you basically invalided your entire argument.The t-34 is not meant to be spammed its meant to be used in conjunction with the TD's or AI tanks. You can spam 5 t-34's all you want its not going to change the fact that 1 p4 with 2 stugs is going to nail 5 t-34's to the wall. same goes for 5 p4's and 1 t-34 and 2 su85's.
But at the moment its difficult to get a t-34 and 2 su85's



The stats between the p4 and the t-34 is not as colossal as you make it out to be. 150 vs 180 armour and 20% less dps for the the t-34. that's why pay more for the p4. And while the mg does aid the p4 with AI its not free.


Holy shit dude. You can't use callins as an excuse to gimp the main faction. What about the 12 doctrines without IS2/t34/85/m4c? Should they never be used in favor of callins? Has anyone ever said that OKW is op because you can get p4 call in + kt?

The point of this thread is the need for the core soviet faction to have a decent medium tank to support itself. No army should rely on callins to such a crippling extent. Claiming that callins like the is2 are op (and rightly so), yet expecting the core army to remain as weak as it is currently is just hypocritical, when Ostheer has a great medium in the p4, yet isn't op when used to support a tiger.

If you think heavy callins meta late game is perfectly balanced and fun/ not cheesy to use and fight, then I question your sanity.

Now then, please try again.

Edit: in terms of your p4 vs. T34/76 statement. The t34 has a 100/180 chance to pen a stock P4 at mid range while the p4 has a 110/180 chance. This is at vet 0. At vet 2, the p4 gets over 220 effective armor at vet 2, giving the t34 < 50% to pen at mid and long ranges. At far, the t34 has 80 pen whole the p4 has 100. At close, both tanks have 120 pen.

And the t34 in no way is meant to be used in conjunction with other armor. It has 0 advantages that support armor foes (high dps, high survivability), and has NO LATEGAME units in its tier. People stop using t70s late game because t70s have 320hp (1 pak43/jt/ele, 2 pak), not because people suck. Su85's are almost impossible to tech to. T34s are absolutely meant to be spammed.
13 Jun 2015, 02:13 AM
#334
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2015, 00:23 AMGrumpy
Or Relic could just make the T34/85 the standard T4 tank, and make the T34/76 into the call-in, with a low cp value so it still has some shock value. WFA was supposed to be late war and the standard Soviet tank was the T34/85 by then.


If they did that, the T-34/85 would need to see a nerf then. It's a bit strong to be your basic medium tank, and you wouldn't be able to field as many of them either. They should be at least P4 level if they're to be stock.
13 Jun 2015, 02:37 AM
#335
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2015, 00:29 AMZyllen


is their a reason why the 85 should be there?


You still haven't answered the question of what units do the US players have that can take damage like Tigers, Panthers, Elefants, JT's, KT's? That and arguments like using dps for comparing tanks show that you either don't understand the game or are just trolling.
13 Jun 2015, 02:41 AM
#336
avatar of Grumpy

Posts: 1958



If they did that, the T-34/85 would need to see a nerf then. It's a bit strong to be your basic medium tank, and you wouldn't be able to field as many of them either. They should be at least P4 level if they're to be stock.


Sure, and while Relic is at it, they should nerf the Panther down to P4 level also, because they're the other tanks available in Tier 4.
13 Jun 2015, 02:59 AM
#337
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2015, 02:41 AMGrumpy


Sure, and while Relic is at it, they should nerf the Panther down to P4 level also, because they're the other tanks available in Tier 4.

That makes zero sense.
13 Jun 2015, 03:59 AM
#338
avatar of daspoulos

Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1

Permanently Banned

That makes zero sense. You should know as to why.
edit button too hard
13 Jun 2015, 04:22 AM
#339
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

13 Jun 2015, 04:25 AM
#340
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

jump backJump back to quoted post13 Jun 2015, 02:41 AMGrumpy
Sure, and while Relic is at it, they should nerf the Panther down to P4 level also, because they're the other tanks available in Tier 4.


Soviet T4 isn't equivalent to Ostheer T4. The Panther is not a generalist tank, it's a tank hunter.
PAGES (20)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Osinyagov: Suddenly, coh2 is slowly dying, but you can play it, playerbase still big enough
09 Apr 2025, 17:00 PM
Osinyagov: Wow, i remember you from zansi and vali videos, good old memories
09 Apr 2025, 16:58 PM
Beinhard: o7 miss this game and zansi
09 Apr 2025, 14:09 PM
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone do you speak on his behalf? I didn't know. In that case keep us updated please.
18 Mar 2025, 16:47 PM
Rosbone: #RelicModdedEchoChamber
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Rosbone: @Nickbn True except, the only people on the Relic Discord/Reddit/Steam are brain washed monkey zealots. They wont even understand what @adamírcz is talking about. Anyone else is banned.
16 Mar 2025, 17:54 PM
Nickbn: @adamírcz might be a better idea to voice this to relic directly than to voice it here, in a shoutbox of a nearly deade fansite #justsaying...
16 Mar 2025, 16:36 PM
webdesign-muenchen-w: @Rosbone it is sick
14 Mar 2025, 22:09 PM
aerafield: @adamírcz aren't the first two disconnects free every day?
14 Mar 2025, 19:26 PM
Rosbone: It is so unlike Relic to punish its fans and community.
14 Mar 2025, 12:07 PM
adamírcz: So, I just got a leaver penalty without even getting onto the loading screen because of the game disconnecting, bravo Relic
14 Mar 2025, 10:45 AM
Rosbone: It is an indicator of the very short sighted capitalist view that plagues any company where leadership does not understand the product.
13 Mar 2025, 20:00 PM
Rosbone: They dont care about Coh3 or Coh in general. They are just trying to grab cash by ripping off the small user base they have.
13 Mar 2025, 19:58 PM
Rosbone: Just making mistake after mistake after mistake.
13 Mar 2025, 19:57 PM
Rosbone: It is clear they crapped out an unfinished game. And are now barely supporting it as they make new smaller games. Coh3 is stillborn. It will be meh for at least another 2-4 years. Meaning they killed the whole franchise instead of growing it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:56 PM
Rosbone: For a thing they could fix in minutes. Literally minutes.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: If I did play coh3 and was mainly a skirmish player, I would be pissed and probably stop playing. And it has been like this since release. Why? I would not tell my friends to buy a game I am not even playing. Lost sales and angered users.
13 Mar 2025, 19:53 PM
Rosbone: I am just saddened how Relic keeps hurting themselves by not fixing 5 minute things like menus. Why anger users with stuff that could be fixed in minutes???
13 Mar 2025, 19:50 PM
Rosbone: I was wondering why people think I was raging. I think it was when I said "because coh3 sucks so bad". That was not my opinion. Just a general feel from top players/streamers. I dont play Coh3 and have NO opinion of it.
13 Mar 2025, 19:48 PM
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
12 Mar 2025, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
12 Mar 2025, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
12 Mar 2025, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
12 Mar 2025, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
12 Mar 2025, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
12 Mar 2025, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
12 Mar 2025, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
12 Mar 2025, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
12 Mar 2025, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
07 Mar 2025, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
06 Mar 2025, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
06 Mar 2025, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
06 Mar 2025, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
06 Mar 2025, 10:49 AM
Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
06 Mar 2025, 03:20 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. :rofl:
05 Mar 2025, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

352 users are online: 1 member and 351 guests
voytecky
2 posts in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53787
Welcome our newest member, voytecky
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM