Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
If stats were available since launch and included all pplayers ( not just top 200). I guarantee the OKW winrate is probably around 90-95% in 3v3 and 4v4, 80-90 in 2v2, and 70-80 in 1v1. While both allied faction winrate would decrease atleast 20% for every game mode.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
Well I would of course believe everything you guarantee, Queen. For your only target it's the perfect balance. Seen from allied perspective, of course.
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
10 
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Posts: 738
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
Tone it down a notch okay people? This is the 62985298th Thread that is almost solely running on personal arguments.
10 Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
I'm sorry. I will go now and L2P to reach Queen's level.
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
This goes to both of you!
3 
Posts: 545
Posts: 258
10 Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
I know, I was just making a joke. Geez.
Posts: 270
Volksgrenadiers are totally fine.
I'll try again.
The source of my frustrations that should be removed
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Putting Johnny right beside Katitof, over 1000 posts, no player card, responds to most discussions with memes. Derail master, I seriously can say I respect Alex and Queen for posting player cards to show something for thier words, even if they get abit passionate. This derail crap is getting ridiculous, to the topic though I don't really find Volks struggle once they climb above vet 2. as with most units preservation is the key to success.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 33
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Permanently Banned
axis
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
A week. A trickle of sand on a beach. A straw in a haystack. Let's remember it, and give it as example whenever our bias blinds us. For comrade Stalin pays us well ...comrade.
Posts: 728
Those coh2charts actually don't prove anything unless those games were between players who represnt similar level of experience. And as far as i know there's no data about that.
Posts: 1637
I love this idea! This will make battles much more tactical and steady. Again, great idea
Volks are fine as they are.
I can't actually compete with rifle squads if the US player got serious and attacked mid range in a blob duel. Plus the fact USF has a doctrine for a jeep early game...
Shreks on volks are not for offense, just defense. The description on a bulletin implies that when talking about panzershreks somewhere. I can't actually run up and snipe a Sherman tank with 3-4 volk squads, just scare it off.
And it's nice to deal with clown cars. These things deserve a shrek right up the exhaust pipe.
The PTRS's are fine as they are. Whenever i'm up against Guard Infantry, I always have to be careful with my vehicles or the Guards will completely destroy them. Good range, good damage and fairly cheap; if anything, the PTRS should nerfed since it's ridiculously good for the price. Even in the hands of Conscripts, the PTRS's are extremely potent.
Posts: 728
Also its not volks that are problem here, its the shrecks on them, this always was the problem and always will be, OKW muni penalty is irrelevant as all it does it set the time of first shreck, all of them will end up carrying one anyway over the course of the game and best AT weapon on cheapest, easily sustainable and excellently scaling squad was an invitation for balance problem.
Posts: 258
In other words, they suck balls and need to be blobbed (4 units +) in order to be remotely effective.
Posts: 1217
Also its not volks that are problem here, its the shrecks on them, this always was the problem and always will be, OKW muni penalty is irrelevant as all it does it set the time of first shreck, all of them will end up carrying one anyway over the course of the game and best AT weapon on cheapest, easily sustainable and excellently scaling squad was an invitation for balance problem.That´s probably the tradeoff for neither having a 60 range AT gun nor a medium tank.
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
181 | ||
 |
|
|
35 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
